-
Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997)
0.09
0.0881859 = product of:
0.13227884 = sum of:
0.015375986 = weight(_text_:in in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015375986 = score(doc=538,freq=12.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.11690286 = sum of:
0.0753006 = weight(_text_:education in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0753006 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041602265 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The elements that comprise 'style' in creative writing are directly applicable to librarians, in the choice of books and periodicals, and in the process of cataloguing and classification to make them accessible to users. By the selection and arrangement of their stock librarians reveal professional accounts of the culture they have inherited and are endeavouring to pass on to future generations. Illustrates the discussion with particular reference to the life and career of Dr. John Henry Pyle Pafford, Librarian at London University, and in particular to his views on the development of general classification schemes, such as the DDC and BC, and the work of the CRG. Concludes by noting his work in the fields of education, national and international library cooperation, and as Library-Keeper of the University
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Kumar, K.: Historical roots of Ranganathan's Colon Classification (Edition 1) (1992)
0.04
0.03773993 = product of:
0.05660989 = sum of:
0.012684541 = weight(_text_:in in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012684541 = score(doc=50,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.043925352 = product of:
0.087850705 = sum of:
0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087850705 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes S.R. Ranganathan's contribution to library and information science in general, mentioning his library education at London and influence of W.C. Berwick Sayers. Describes the seeds of Colon Classification, ed.1 (CC-1) and discusses the salient features of the scheme. Brings out the indebtedness of Ranganathan to Melvil Dewey and describes the influence of UDC on CC-1. Discusses the growth and development of the concept of 'categories', mentioning the influence of W. Hulme, W.S. Biscoe and others. Concludes that Ranganathan possessed an amazing degree of ingenuity to apply established ideas in such a way in a distinctive and original way
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990)
0.04
0.03610447 = product of:
0.054156706 = sum of:
0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012554439 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.041602265 = product of:
0.08320453 = sum of:
0.08320453 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08320453 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:28:43
- Footnote
- Reprint of article originally published in Library journal 15 Feb 20.
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.03
0.02998784 = product of:
0.04498176 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=632,freq=16.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.02426799 = product of:
0.04853598 = sum of:
0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04853598 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
- Content
- This paper is an adaptation and augmented version of a paper presented at the NASKO 2011 conference: Charles van den Heuvel. 2011. Multidimensional classifications: Past and future conceptualizations and visualizations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 105-21. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_6_e.pdf.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.03
0.026957093 = product of:
0.04043564 = sum of:
0.0090603875 = weight(_text_:in in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0090603875 = score(doc=3849,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.03137525 = product of:
0.0627505 = sum of:
0.0627505 = weight(_text_:education in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0627505 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.260262 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
-
Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985)
0.03
0.026792508 = product of:
0.04018876 = sum of:
0.015088559 = weight(_text_:in in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015088559 = score(doc=571,freq=26.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2167489 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.025100201 = product of:
0.050200403 = sum of:
0.050200403 = weight(_text_:education in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050200403 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2082096 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
- Footnote
- Original in: Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing. London: Pitman 1991. Vol. II, Paragraphs 1-18, 52-58, 295-348.
-
Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014)
0.03
0.02642186 = product of:
0.03963279 = sum of:
0.01883166 = weight(_text_:in in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01883166 = score(doc=1429,freq=18.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.020801133 = product of:
0.041602265 = sum of:
0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041602265 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947)
0.03
0.026380857 = product of:
0.039571285 = sum of:
0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011836439 = score(doc=6607,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
0.027734846 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05546969 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Einer der lesenswertesten Beiträge in der Geschichte der Sacherschließung im deutschen Bibliothekswesen; enthält Situationsbeschreibung der SUB Hamburg im Jahr 1946 und Vorschläge für die Neugestaltung eines systematischen Erschließungssystems. - Vgl. auch spätere Beiträge von E. Zimmermann u. H. Vollmer
- Source
- Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
-
Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997)
0.02
0.024635023 = product of:
0.036952533 = sum of:
0.012684541 = weight(_text_:in in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012684541 = score(doc=75,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.02426799 = product of:
0.04853598 = sum of:
0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04853598 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
-
Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010)
0.02
0.02201822 = product of:
0.03302733 = sum of:
0.015693048 = weight(_text_:in in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015693048 = score(doc=3509,freq=18.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.017334279 = product of:
0.034668557 = sum of:
0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034668557 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In light of ongoing debates about ontological vs. epistemological approaches to knowledge organization (KO), this paper examines E. C. Richardson's treatment of ontology and epistemology in his theory of classification. According to Richardson, there is a natural order of things in the world accessible to human cognition, which may be expressed in two classificatory orders: evolutionary classification, which ranges classes of things from the most simple to the most complex, and logical classification, which ranges classes of things in the inverse order, from the most complex to the most simple. Evolutionary classification reflects ontological order and logical classification reflects epistemological order: both are faces of a single natural order. Such a view requires adherence to a representationalist, or, in Hjorland's (2008) terms, positivist understanding of epistemology, wherein human knowledge faithfully mirrors the structure of the external world. Richardson's harmonization of ontology and epistemology will find little favor among proponents of the currently fashionable pragmatist approach to KO. Nevertheless, it constitutes an early version of what Gnoli (2004) terms a naturalistic epistemology, which, once deepened and clarified, offers the best prospects for an explicit expression of both the ontological and epistemological dimensions of knowledge within a single classification of general scope.
- Pages
- S.15-22
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.02
0.021060942 = product of:
0.03159141 = sum of:
0.0073234225 = weight(_text_:in in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073234225 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.02426799 = product of:
0.04853598 = sum of:
0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04853598 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971)
0.02
0.018489897 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = product of:
0.11093938 = sum of:
0.11093938 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11093938 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
-
Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012)
0.02
0.016488036 = product of:
0.024732053 = sum of:
0.007397774 = weight(_text_:in in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007397774 = score(doc=116,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.017334279 = product of:
0.034668557 = sum of:
0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034668557 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The origin of the abridged edition of the Dewey system goes back to 1894 when an outline of 192 pages based on the full 5th Edition (1894) was issued for small public and school libraries of North America. New editions have appeared regularly following closely the publication of new full editions. An abridged version, which is always in one volume, comprises an introduction, schedules, four tables (namely 1, 2, 3 and 4) only, and the relative index and other minor features of the full edition, and has shorter numbers. Abridged 15 is a logical abridgement of the DDC23 (2011) and is a product of a new approach to development of an abridged edition of the DDC. Its content has been derived from the DDC database applying a set of rules to extract the edition using the new (2010) version of the editorial support system. The revision process has been informed by interaction with an always widening and diversified Dewey community at home and abroad. It aims to improve the currency of the schedules continuing to serve as shelving tool while recognizing its 'other' uses as a spinoff of its simplicity and inexpensiveness.
- Date
- 3. 3.2016 18:59:22
-
Dahlberg, I.: Major developments in classification (1977)
0.01
0.00789096 = product of:
0.023672879 = sum of:
0.023672879 = weight(_text_:in in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023672879 = score(doc=1619,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 7(1977), S.41-103
-
Hansson, J.: Why public libraries in Sweden did not choose Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.0072483094 = product of:
0.021744927 = sum of:
0.021744927 = weight(_text_:in in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021744927 = score(doc=312,freq=24.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The article identifies 2 distinct sections, one within the public library sphere and one in academic libraries, relevant for the development of a unique Swedish classification system (the SAB-system) to be used in public libraries. These are used to analyse the social and discursive influences that led to a rejection of the DDC as the common classification system for the public libraries in Sweden. The author analyses the debate that took place in the 1910s in various publications and idetifies theoretical as well as some practical reasons for rejecting the DDC. Reference is also made to the situation in Norway and Denmark at this time and their attempts to influence Sweden to accept the DDC as had been done in these countries. Conclusions are drawn that the reasons for rejection of the DDC not only is to be sought in theoretical or even practical problems regarding the system itself but in the academic library sector which, through the SAB-system, could create a lasting influence on the knowledge organisation in public libraries in order to uphold the national identity of thre Swedish library system
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification on the march (1961)
0.01
0.00690459 = product of:
0.020713769 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=2001,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Essays in librarianship in memory of William Charles Berwick Sayers: The Sayers memorial volume. Ed.: D.J. Foskett et al
-
Rafferty, P.: ¬The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes (2001)
0.01
0.0066167708 = product of:
0.019850312 = sum of:
0.019850312 = weight(_text_:in in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019850312 = score(doc=640,freq=20.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.28515202 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article explores the representation of knowledge through the discursive practice of 'general' or 'universal' classification schemes. These classification schemes were constructed within a philosophical framework which viewed `man' as the central focus in the universe, which believed in progress through science and research, and which privileged written documentation over other forms. All major classification schemes are built on clearly identifiable systems of knowledge, and all classification schemes, as discursive formations, regulate the ways in which knowledge is made accessible. Of particular interest in determining how knowledge is represented in classification schemes are the following: - Main classes: classification theorists have attempted to 'discipline epistemology' in the sense of imposing main class structures with the view to simplifying access to knowledge in documents for library users. - Notational language: a number of classification theorists were particularly interested in the establishment of symbolic languages through notation. The article considers these aspects of classification theory in relation to: the Dewey Decimal Classification scheme; Otlet and La Fontaine's Universal Bibliographic Classification and the International Institute of Bibliography; Henry Evelyn Bliss's Bibliographic Classification; and S.R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification.
-
Furner, J.: Classification of the sciences in Greco-Roman Antiquity (2021)
0.01
0.0064586527 = product of:
0.019375958 = sum of:
0.019375958 = weight(_text_:in in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019375958 = score(doc=583,freq=14.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A review is undertaken of the contributions of 38 classical authors, from Pythagoras in the 6th century BCE to Isidore in the 6th century CE, to the classification of the sciences. Such classifications include some that are more theoretical in function, some that are more practical (e.g., encyclopedic, bibliographic, or curricular). The emergence of the quadrivium and trivium is charted; the Greek concept of "enkýklios paideía" and the Latin term "artes liberales" are defined; and the ways in which the form, content, and function of science classifications change during this period are assessed.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Special issue on 'Science and knowledge organization' mit längeren Überblicken zu wichtigen Begriffen der Wissensorgansiation.
- Series
- Reviews of concepts in knowledge organziation
-
Rückert, I.: Klassifikatorische Erschließung in der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (2008)
0.01
0.00627722 = product of:
0.01883166 = sum of:
0.01883166 = weight(_text_:in in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01883166 = score(doc=2153,freq=18.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The history of classified order relating to the Bavarian State Library dates back to the library's origins and the theoretical treatise its collections inspired. Many more classifications followed to facilitate practical access to the ever expanding collections, both in the open-access areas and in the closed stacks. The most comprehensive classifications used in the library are introduced in chronological order and as instruments to ensure the continuity of subject access in a kind of logical sequence: the Classified Shelf-Register of 1814, the Old Classified Catalogue 1501 - 1952 dating from the 1870s, the Hirschberger Catalogue 1953 - 1981, the Munich Classification of 1983 and the development of an Online Classification (DDC) based on the Dewey Decimal Classification from a predecessor in 1999 to announce the latest acquisitions in the special collection fields.
- Source
- New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Die Bibliothek als locus communis (1998)
0.01
0.0062383516 = product of:
0.018715054 = sum of:
0.018715054 = weight(_text_:in in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018715054 = score(doc=4025,freq=10.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Mit Leibniz beginnt in den Bibliotheken die lange Geschichte der Verdrängung rhetorischer Wissensordnungen zugunsten eines Kalküls, die die Elemente des Wissens berechenbar machen wollte und in der virtuellen Bibliothek realisiert scheint. Daß aber in den Datenbanken nichts Relevantes mehr gefunden werden kann, ist das Menetekel der seit Leibniz betriebenen Verfahrenstechnik des Wissens, die uns in der Befreiung von Irrelevantem eine technisch verfügbare Präsenz des Wissens versprach. Nach ihrem Scheitern bleibt einzig der Rückgang auf rhetorische Ordnungen des Wissens, wie sie in den Bibliotheken immer schon aufgebaut wurden
