Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978) 0.03
    0.026020419 = product of:
      0.052040838 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
        0.03504768 = product of:
          0.07009536 = sum of:
            0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07009536 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization 43(2016) no.6, S.462-473.
  2. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.01
    0.013661247 = product of:
      0.054644987 = sum of:
        0.054644987 = product of:
          0.109289974 = sum of:
            0.109289974 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109289974 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  3. Coates, E.J.: Classification in information retrieval : the twenty years following Dorking (1978) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    

Languages