Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.022586072 = product of:
  0.045172144 = sum of:
    0.045172144 = product of:
      0.09034429 = sum of:
        0.09034429 = weight(_text_:w in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09034429 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.021862958 = product of:
  0.043725915 = sum of:
    0.043725915 = sum of:
      0.027378455 = weight(_text_:w in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027378455 = score(doc=1786,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.040219255 = queryNorm
          0.17863151 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.01634746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01634746 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.040219255 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

AVJ (W)

Date

22. 3.2008 17:56:19

GHBS

AVJ (W)

0.009536019 = product of:
  0.019072037 = sum of:
    0.019072037 = product of:
      0.038144074 = sum of:
        0.038144074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038144074 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

0.003298259 = product of:
  0.006596518 = sum of:
    0.006596518 = product of:
      0.046175625 = sum of:
        0.046175625 = weight(_text_:authors in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046175625 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1833521 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!