Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.015280788 = product of:
  0.07640394 = sum of:
    0.07640394 = weight(_text_:like in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07640394 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.272926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.067524 = idf(docFreq=756, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053857863 = queryNorm
        0.2799438 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.067524 = idf(docFreq=756, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!

0.010215796 = product of:
  0.05107898 = sum of:
    0.05107898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05107898 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18860106 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053857863 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

0.004378198 = product of:
  0.02189099 = sum of:
    0.02189099 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02189099 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18860106 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053857863 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2008 17:56:19