Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.07887393 = sum of:
  0.054138467 = product of:
    0.1624154 = sum of:
      0.1624154 = weight(_text_:20th in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1624154 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33097145 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.345029 = idf(docFreq=210, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052162323 = queryNorm
          0.49072328 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.345029 = idf(docFreq=210, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.024735462 = product of:
    0.049470924 = sum of:
      0.049470924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049470924 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18266357 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052162323 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

0.019335166 = product of:
  0.03867033 = sum of:
    0.03867033 = product of:
      0.11601099 = sum of:
        0.11601099 = weight(_text_:20th in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11601099 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33097145 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.345029 = idf(docFreq=210, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052162323 = queryNorm
            0.35051662 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.345029 = idf(docFreq=210, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!

0.005300456 = product of:
  0.010600912 = sum of:
    0.010600912 = product of:
      0.021201825 = sum of:
        0.021201825 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021201825 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18266357 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052162323 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 17:56:19