Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997) 0.08
    0.07781324 = product of:
      0.15562648 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
        0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051885046 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The elements that comprise 'style' in creative writing are directly applicable to librarians, in the choice of books and periodicals, and in the process of cataloguing and classification to make them accessible to users. By the selection and arrangement of their stock librarians reveal professional accounts of the culture they have inherited and are endeavouring to pass on to future generations. Illustrates the discussion with particular reference to the life and career of Dr. John Henry Pyle Pafford, Librarian at London University, and in particular to his views on the development of general classification schemes, such as the DDC and BC, and the work of the CRG. Concludes by noting his work in the fields of education, national and international library cooperation, and as Library-Keeper of the University
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  2. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.03
    0.034590032 = product of:
      0.13836013 = sum of:
        0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13836013 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  3. Charaf, I.: Conceptualisation and organization of knowledge between the 10th and 14th centuries in Arabic culture (2004) 0.03
    0.03458048 = product of:
      0.13832192 = sum of:
        0.13832192 = weight(_text_:fields in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13832192 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.43766826 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    I present a detailed philosophical study of three classification systems: Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun. The primary aim of this study is to formulate the underlying philosophical basis of each classification and to relate this basis to certain principles contained in the Islamic revelation. I also give analytical treatment of the following questions: the major distinguishing features of each classification and the attitude of each thinker towards the philosophical and religious sciences and how they envisaged the distinction between the two fields.
  4. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.03
    0.025942523 = product of:
      0.10377009 = sum of:
        0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10377009 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  5. Rückert, I.: Klassifikatorische Erschließung in der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (2008) 0.03
    0.02593536 = product of:
      0.10374144 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=2153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The history of classified order relating to the Bavarian State Library dates back to the library's origins and the theoretical treatise its collections inspired. Many more classifications followed to facilitate practical access to the ever expanding collections, both in the open-access areas and in the closed stacks. The most comprehensive classifications used in the library are introduced in chronological order and as instruments to ensure the continuity of subject access in a kind of logical sequence: the Classified Shelf-Register of 1814, the Old Classified Catalogue 1501 - 1952 dating from the 1870s, the Hirschberger Catalogue 1953 - 1981, the Munich Classification of 1983 and the development of an Online Classification (DDC) based on the Dewey Decimal Classification from a predecessor in 1999 to announce the latest acquisitions in the special collection fields.
  6. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.02
    0.0216128 = product of:
      0.0864512 = sum of:
        0.0864512 = weight(_text_:fields in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0864512 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.27354267 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
  7. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.02
    0.017295016 = product of:
      0.069180064 = sum of:
        0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069180064 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  8. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.02
    0.015133139 = product of:
      0.060532555 = sum of:
        0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060532555 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  9. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.02
    0.015133139 = product of:
      0.060532555 = sum of:
        0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060532555 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  10. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.02
    0.015133139 = product of:
      0.060532555 = sum of:
        0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060532555 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  11. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.01
    0.0129712615 = product of:
      0.051885046 = sum of:
        0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051885046 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010) 0.01
    0.010809385 = product of:
      0.04323754 = sum of:
        0.04323754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04323754 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  13. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.01
    0.010809385 = product of:
      0.04323754 = sum of:
        0.04323754 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04323754 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22
  14. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.01
    0.0064856308 = product of:
      0.025942523 = sum of:
        0.025942523 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025942523 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19

Years

Languages

  • e 10
  • d 4

Types

  • a 13
  • m 1