-
Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997)
0.06
0.0644421 = product of:
0.1288842 = sum of:
0.1288842 = product of:
0.19332628 = sum of:
0.147312 = weight(_text_:universal in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.147312 = score(doc=75,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.576273 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
-
Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014)
0.04
0.042908456 = product of:
0.08581691 = sum of:
0.08581691 = product of:
0.12872536 = sum of:
0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08928455 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039440814 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Kyle, B.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a study of the present position and future developments (1961)
0.03
0.03472177 = product of:
0.06944354 = sum of:
0.06944354 = product of:
0.20833062 = sum of:
0.20833062 = weight(_text_:universal in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20833062 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.8149731 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Arntz, H.: Universality of classification? : Keynote address (1982)
0.03
0.029761516 = product of:
0.05952303 = sum of:
0.05952303 = product of:
0.1785691 = sum of:
0.1785691 = weight(_text_:universal in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1785691 = score(doc=49,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.6985484 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Favier, L.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.: From text to image : the concept of universality in the knowledge organization system designed by Paul Otlet and the International Institute of Bibliography (2012)
0.03
0.029761516 = product of:
0.05952303 = sum of:
0.05952303 = product of:
0.1785691 = sum of:
0.1785691 = weight(_text_:universal in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1785691 = score(doc=851,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.6985484 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper will examine the documentary universalism defended by Paul Otlet, as an aspect of his universalist philosophy. We will particularly be focusing on two elements of his knowledge organization theory: text and image documents. Then we will compare Otlet's universalist approach with the challenges of the "universal search" at the internet age. In order to discuss Paul Otlet's legacy, related to universal search and UDC role, we are currently analyzing the UIR archives, and more broadly, the Mundaneum's archives. The most important part of our research carried in the Mundaneum's archives will concern the Universal Iconographic Repertory (UIR) and what it reveals about the nature of the UDC and its's role in the universal search. This term covers both search engines and online libraries' catalogs tailored for searching on the Web.
-
Hopwood, H.V.: Dewey expanded (1985)
0.02
0.022182927 = product of:
0.044365853 = sum of:
0.044365853 = product of:
0.13309756 = sum of:
0.13309756 = weight(_text_:universal in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13309756 = score(doc=3629,freq=10.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.52066725 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Toward the end of the nineteenth century, Paul Otlet and Henri LaFontaine of Belgium initiated the compilation of an index to all recorded knowledge. Instead of an alphabetical file, they decided to adopt a classified arrangement. For the basis of such an arrangement, they turned to the Dewey Decimal Classification, a system which was gaining wide acceptance in American libraries. With permission secured from Melvil Dewey to expand the system to include details required for an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine began developing what was to become the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). Following the establishment of the Institut International de Bibliographie (IIB), later the Fédération Internationale de Documentation (FID), in 1895, work an the universal index and the classification scheme proceeded under its aegis. In 1905, the classification scheme was published as the Manuel du Répertoire bibliographique universel. While the initial, ambitious project of the universal index was abandoned, the classification scheme itself was widely adopted, particularly in special libraries in Europe. A second edition was published in 1927-1933 under the title Classification décimale universelle. The development and maintanance of the scheme continued with the support of the FID. In the course of its development, the UDC moved further and further away from its prototype, the Dewey Decimal Classification. One of the major differences between the two systems is the use of relators in UDC. The notation adopted by Melvil Dewey for his scheme is a hierarchical one; in other words, the notation reflects the hierarchical relationships among subjects. However, it does not display the relationships among the facets, or aspects, of a particular subject. Furthermore, the use of auxiliaries in the Dewey Decimal Classification, beginning with the form subdivisions and gradually expanding to include geographic subdivisions and finally other auxiliaries in the most recent editions, has been relatively restricted. As an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine felt that their system needed commonly applicable auxiliaries which they called "determinatives."` To this end, a series of special symbols were introduced into the system for the purpose of combining related subjects and indicating different facets or aspects of the main subject. The use of these symbols, called relators, with the auxiliaries has rendered the Universal Decimal Classification a synthetic scheme. In this respect, the UDC has moved much more rapidly than the Dewey Decimal Classification toward becoming a faceted classification. In the following paper, Henry V. Hopwood, a Senior Assistant at the British Patent Office Library during the 1900s, explains the use and rationale of relators, or "marks," as he calls them, in the Universal Decimal Classification.
-
Rafferty, P.: ¬The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes (2001)
0.02
0.021044573 = product of:
0.042089146 = sum of:
0.042089146 = product of:
0.12626743 = sum of:
0.12626743 = weight(_text_:universal in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12626743 = score(doc=640,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.49394834 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article explores the representation of knowledge through the discursive practice of 'general' or 'universal' classification schemes. These classification schemes were constructed within a philosophical framework which viewed `man' as the central focus in the universe, which believed in progress through science and research, and which privileged written documentation over other forms. All major classification schemes are built on clearly identifiable systems of knowledge, and all classification schemes, as discursive formations, regulate the ways in which knowledge is made accessible. Of particular interest in determining how knowledge is represented in classification schemes are the following: - Main classes: classification theorists have attempted to 'discipline epistemology' in the sense of imposing main class structures with the view to simplifying access to knowledge in documents for library users. - Notational language: a number of classification theorists were particularly interested in the establishment of symbolic languages through notation. The article considers these aspects of classification theory in relation to: the Dewey Decimal Classification scheme; Otlet and La Fontaine's Universal Bibliographic Classification and the International Institute of Bibliography; Henry Evelyn Bliss's Bibliographic Classification; and S.R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification.
-
LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007)
0.02
0.019841012 = product of:
0.039682023 = sum of:
0.039682023 = product of:
0.11904607 = sum of:
0.11904607 = weight(_text_:universal in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11904607 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Revisits the heritage of faceted classification (FC) beginning with an examination of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in its early manifestations and the groundwork established by international documentalist groups. Early document retrieval experimentation with FC during the intensive period of system design, testing and evaluation in the 1950s and 1960s is discussed, as well as the rise of an international discourse community that sought to augment and extend the reach of FC through system implementations. A list of acronyms employed in the article is given in an appendix.
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
-
Olson, H.A.: Cultural discourse of classification : indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Durkheim, and Foucault (2001)
0.02
0.017360885 = product of:
0.03472177 = sum of:
0.03472177 = product of:
0.10416531 = sum of:
0.10416531 = weight(_text_:universal in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10416531 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.40748656 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper explores the cultural construction of classification by identifying fundamental characteristics of classification and examining how these fit with other cultures. Foucault's method of discourse analysis is applied to selected texts an classification in two areas. The first area is classification originated in the dominant Western culture. The second area is classifications from indigenous cultures. It is concluded that classification research needs to have an increasing awareness of the cultural construction of classification schemes and to work with alternatives to approaches of fundamental universal principles of classification.
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.01
0.014880758 = product of:
0.029761516 = sum of:
0.029761516 = product of:
0.08928455 = sum of:
0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08928455 = score(doc=2072,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990)
0.01
0.013146939 = product of:
0.026293878 = sum of:
0.026293878 = product of:
0.07888163 = sum of:
0.07888163 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07888163 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:28:43
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997)
0.01
0.012400633 = product of:
0.024801265 = sum of:
0.024801265 = product of:
0.07440379 = sum of:
0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07440379 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985)
0.01
0.008680442 = product of:
0.017360885 = sum of:
0.017360885 = product of:
0.052082654 = sum of:
0.052082654 = weight(_text_:universal in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052082654 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.20374328 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.
-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997)
0.01
0.0065734694 = product of:
0.013146939 = sum of:
0.013146939 = product of:
0.039440814 = sum of:
0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039440814 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010)
0.01
0.0054778913 = product of:
0.010955783 = sum of:
0.010955783 = product of:
0.032867346 = sum of:
0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032867346 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012)
0.01
0.0054778913 = product of:
0.010955783 = sum of:
0.010955783 = product of:
0.032867346 = sum of:
0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032867346 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 3.2016 18:59:22
