-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.03
0.027476845 = product of:
0.05495369 = sum of:
0.05495369 = product of:
0.16486107 = sum of:
0.16486107 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16486107 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44000652 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995)
0.02
0.021095091 = product of:
0.042190183 = sum of:
0.042190183 = product of:
0.084380366 = sum of:
0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084380366 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22
-
Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947)
0.01
0.014063395 = product of:
0.02812679 = sum of:
0.02812679 = product of:
0.05625358 = sum of:
0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05625358 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
-
Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004)
0.01
0.014063395 = product of:
0.02812679 = sum of:
0.02812679 = product of:
0.05625358 = sum of:
0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05625358 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:33:51
-
Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015)
0.01
0.014063395 = product of:
0.02812679 = sum of:
0.02812679 = product of:
0.05625358 = sum of:
0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05625358 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2016 15:58:46
-
Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013)
0.01
0.01230547 = product of:
0.02461094 = sum of:
0.02461094 = product of:
0.04922188 = sum of:
0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04922188 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:10:07
-
Su, S.-F.: Dialogue with an OPAC : how visionary was Swanson in 1964? (1994)
0.01
0.01159359 = product of:
0.02318718 = sum of:
0.02318718 = product of:
0.04637436 = sum of:
0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 7674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04637436 = score(doc=7674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 7674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 1964 Swanson published an article 'Dialogues with a catalog', in which he presented a personal prescription for what a library catalog should look like at some future date. He was in many ways remarkably visionary; some of the features he recommended have still not been implemented, although writers are again referring to their desirability. Despite its visionary qualities, Swanson's article seems to have been quite forgotten. At least, it is rarely cited. This article will trace the development of OPACs from the time they were first introduced into libraries and compare what has occured with Swanson's recommendations. It is remarkable that an article written thirty years ago could still offer a suitable framework within which to review virtually the totality of OPAC developments. The lesson that emerges most clearly from this is that the library profession should prescribe performance goals for tools and services that are not constrained by existing technologies. We must first establish requirements and seek the solutions later
-
Atherton Cochrane, P.: Knowledge space revisited : challenges for twenty-first century library and information science researchers (2013)
0.01
0.01159359 = product of:
0.02318718 = sum of:
0.02318718 = product of:
0.04637436 = sum of:
0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04637436 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests writing a companion work to the Bourne and Hahn book, History of Online Information Services, 1963-1976 (2003), which would feature milestone improvements in subject access mechanisms developed over time. To provide a background for such a work, a 1976 paper by Meincke and Atherton is revisited wherein the concept of Knowledge Space is defined as "online mechanisms used for handling a user's knowledge level while a search was being formulated and processed." Research that followed in the 1980s and 1990s is linked together for the first time. Seven projects are suggested for current researchers to undertake so they can assess the utility of earlier research ideas that did not get a proper chance for development. It is just possible that they may have value and be found useful in today's information environment.
-
Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012)
0.01
0.008789622 = product of:
0.017579244 = sum of:
0.017579244 = product of:
0.03515849 = sum of:
0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03515849 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2016 16:06:54
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Broughton, V.: ¬The Classification Research Group : then and now (2000)
0.01
0.00772906 = product of:
0.01545812 = sum of:
0.01545812 = product of:
0.03091624 = sum of:
0.03091624 = weight(_text_:services in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03091624 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.01
0.0070316973 = product of:
0.014063395 = sum of:
0.014063395 = product of:
0.02812679 = sum of:
0.02812679 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02812679 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051899735 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
