Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990) 0.01
    0.009710376 = product of:
      0.038841505 = sum of:
        0.038841505 = weight(_text_:information in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038841505 = score(doc=155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.575-591
  2. Frakes, W.B.: Introduction to information storage and retrieval systems (1992) 0.01
    0.005946367 = product of:
      0.023785468 = sum of:
        0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 3496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023785468 = score(doc=3496,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3496, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3496)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter introduces and defines basic IR concepts, and presents a domain model of IR systems that describes their similarities and differences. The domain model is used to introduce and relate the chapters that follow. The relationship of IR systems to other information systems is discussed, as is the evaluation of IR systems
    Source
    Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates
  3. Gomez, L.; Lochbaum, C.C.; Landauer, T.K.: All the right words: finding what you want as an function of richness of indexing vocabulary (1990) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for information Science. 41(1990) no.8, S.547-559
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: Some problems of context and terminology (1998) 0.00
    0.004855188 = product of:
      0.019420752 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=4495,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Points out that designers of information systems for subject retrieval aiming at some kind of uinversal usage face the major problem of context, as a word by itself is not meaningful; and inseparable from this problem is that of the terminology used. This problem is most evident in systems that rely totally on words, rather than a systematic structure of some kind
    Source
    Information studies. 4(1998) no.4, S.195-201