-
Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000)
0.07
0.06795319 = product of:
0.101929784 = sum of:
0.045980107 = weight(_text_:wide in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045980107 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
0.02494502 = weight(_text_:web in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02494502 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02143089 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
0.009573761 = product of:
0.028721282 = sum of:
0.028721282 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028721282 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- Suchmaschinen im World Wide Web wird nachgesagt, dass sie - insbesondere im Vergleich zur Retrievalsoftware kommerzieller Online-Archive suboptimale Methoden und Werkzeuge einsetzen. Elaborierte befehlsorientierte Retrievalsysteme sind vom Laien gar nicht und vom Professional nur dann zu bedienen, wenn man stets damit arbeitet. Die Suchsysteme einiger "independents", also isolierter Informationsproduzenten im Internet, zeichnen sich durch einen Minimalismus aus, der an den Befehlsumfang anfangs der 70er Jahre erinnert. Retrievalsoftware in Intranets, wenn sie denn überhaupt benutzt wird, setzt fast ausnahmslos auf automatische Methoden von Indexierung und Retrieval und ignoriert dabei nahezu vollständig dokumentarisches Know how. Suchmaschinen bzw. Retrievalsysteme - wir wollen beide Bezeichnungen synonym verwenden - bereiten demnach, egal wo sie vorkommen, Schwierigkeiten. An ihrer Qualität wird gezweifelt. Aber was heißt überhaupt: Qualität von Suchmaschinen? Was zeichnet ein gutes Retrievalsystem aus? Und was fehlt einem schlechten? Wir wollen eine Liste von Kriterien entwickeln, die für gutes Suchen (und Finden!) wesentlich sind. Es geht also ausschließlich um Quantität und Qualität der Suchoptionen, nicht um weitere Leistungsindikatoren wie Geschwindigkeit oder ergonomische Benutzerschnittstellen. Stillschweigend vorausgesetzt wirdjedoch der Abschied von ausschließlich befehlsorientierten Systemen, d.h. wir unterstellen Bildschirmgestaltungen, die die Befehle intuitiv einleuchtend darstellen. Unsere Checkliste enthält nur solche Optionen, die entweder (bei irgendwelchen Systemen) schon im Einsatz sind (und wiederholt damit zum Teil Altbekanntes) oder deren technische Realisierungsmöglichkeit bereits in experimentellen Umgebungen aufgezeigt worden ist. insofern ist die Liste eine Minimalforderung an Retrievalsysteme, die durchaus erweiterungsfähig ist. Gegliedert wird der Kriterienkatalog nach (1.) den Basisfunktionen zur Suche singulärer Datensätze, (2.) den informetrischen Funktionen zur Charakterisierunggewisser Nachweismengen sowie (3.) den Kriterien zur Mächtigkeit automatischer Indexierung und natürlichsprachiger Suche
- Source
- Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31
-
¬The discipline of organizing (2013)
0.03
0.03205657 = product of:
0.06411314 = sum of:
0.02822207 = weight(_text_:web in 2172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02822207 = score(doc=2172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 2172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2172)
0.029695513 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029695513 = score(doc=2172,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 2172, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2172)
0.0061955573 = product of:
0.018586671 = sum of:
0.018586671 = weight(_text_:system in 2172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018586671 = score(doc=2172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 2172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2172)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Organizing is such a common activity that we often do it without thinking much about it. In our daily lives we organize physical things--books on shelves, cutlery in kitchen drawers--and digital things--Web pages, MP3 files, scientific datasets. Millions of people create and browse Web sites, blog, tag, tweet, and upload and download content of all media types without thinking "I'm organizing now" or "I'm retrieving now." This book offers a framework for the theory and practice of organizing that integrates information organization (IO) and information retrieval (IR), bridging the disciplinary chasms between Library and Information Science and Computer Science, each of which views and teaches IO and IR as separate topics and in substantially different ways. It introduces the unifying concept of an Organizing System--an intentionally arranged collection of resources and the interactions they support--and then explains the key concepts and challenges in the design and deployment of Organizing Systems in many domains, including libraries, museums, business information systems, personal information management, and social computing. Intended for classroom use or as a professional reference, the book covers the activities common to all organizing systems: identifying resources to be organized; organizing resources by describing and classifying them; designing resource-based interactions; and maintaining resources and organization over time. The book is extensively annotated with disciplinary-specific notes to ground it with relevant concepts and references of library science, computing, cognitive science, law, and business.
- RSWK
- Information / Information Retrieval / Organisationslehre
- Subject
- Information / Information Retrieval / Organisationslehre
-
Bekavac, B.: Suchverfahren und Suchdienste des World Wide Web (1996)
0.03
0.028370049 = product of:
0.08511014 = sum of:
0.055176124 = weight(_text_:wide in 4803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055176124 = score(doc=4803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4803)
0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 4803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029934023 = score(doc=4803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4803)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Subject retrieval in the seventies: methods, problems, prospects (1972)
0.01
0.0101026185 = product of:
0.060615707 = sum of:
0.060615707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060615707 = score(doc=227,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions. Proc. of an Int. Symp. ... College Park, May 14-15, 1971. Ed.: H.H. Wellisch et al
-
Jüngling, H.: Bibliothekarische und dokumentarische Sachererschließung auf gemeinsamen Weg in die Zukunft? : Aus bibliothekarischer Sicht (1991)
0.01
0.008572357 = product of:
0.051434137 = sum of:
0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051434137 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Gomez, L.; Lochbaum, C.C.; Landauer, T.K.: All the right words: finding what you want as an function of richness of indexing vocabulary (1990)
0.01
0.008572357 = product of:
0.051434137 = sum of:
0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051434137 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Frakes, W.B.: Introduction to information storage and retrieval systems (1992)
0.01
0.008082095 = product of:
0.048492566 = sum of:
0.048492566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048492566 = score(doc=3496,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3496, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3496)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Some problems of context and terminology (1998)
0.01
0.005714904 = product of:
0.034289423 = sum of:
0.034289423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034289423 = score(doc=4495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042397358 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Points out that designers of information systems for subject retrieval aiming at some kind of uinversal usage face the major problem of context, as a word by itself is not meaningful; and inseparable from this problem is that of the terminology used. This problem is most evident in systems that rely totally on words, rather than a systematic structure of some kind
