Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.020374106 = product of:
  0.040748212 = sum of:
    0.040748212 = product of:
      0.081496425 = sum of:
        0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081496425 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

25. 3.2019 18:15:22

0.013582738 = product of:
  0.027165476 = sum of:
    0.027165476 = product of:
      0.054330952 = sum of:
        0.054330952 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054330952 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.2007 10:07:51

0.008632416 = product of:
  0.017264832 = sum of:
    0.017264832 = product of:
      0.06905933 = sum of:
        0.06905933 = weight(_text_:authors in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06905933 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Originally published in 1979 as a title in the Outlines of Modern Librarianship' series this new edition has been expanded and updated in the light of recent developments in this rapidly developing field of librarianship, with particular reference to automation. As a consequence, this edition is substantially more than an outline of the subject. The authors take the reader through a comprehensive exposition of cataloguing - the definitions, arrangement and role of the catalogue: the history of its development; standardization and AACR2; the subject approach via pre-and post-coordinate indexing; analysis; filing rules and methods; the physical forms of the catalogue; the use of the computer in cataloguing; the role of networks; the management of cataloguing; and the relevance of book indexing. There is a detailed index, as well as a list of abbreviations and acronyms and a glossary of terms.

0.00359684 = product of:
  0.00719368 = sum of:
    0.00719368 = product of:
      0.02877472 = sum of:
        0.02877472 = weight(_text_:authors in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02877472 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05012591 = queryNorm
            0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Criteria for Selection In selecting the writings to be included in this reader, we have followed the criteria listed below: 1. Theoretical emphasis. Our focus is an theoretical and philosophical aspects rather than practical or technical considerations. In a number of cases, where several authors have written an the same subject or idea or expressed similar thoughts, the originator of the idea, if this could be determined, was selected. 2. Significance and impact. Our most important criterion is the significance of a particular piece or the contribution that it has made in the field of subject analysis. The impact of the ideas or concepts an subsequent practice in subject analysis has also been considered. 3. Perspicuity. Where multiple choices were available an a particular topic or area, our tendency was to exclude the writings that are obscure or highly technical and would require a high degree of tech nical sophistication an the part of the reader. Comprehensibility and clarity of style were often our guide. Based an the criteria stated above, the following types of writings have generally been excluded: review articles, the how-to-do-it type of writings, and textbook materials. In a way, it would probably be easier to defend the writings that have been included than to justify the exclusions. In a small volume containing writings chosen from a vast amount of available material, it is virtually impossible to arrive at a collection that will satisfy every reader. Each person has his or her own preferences or criteria. Inevitably, personal bias comes into play in assembling such a reader. At least, we hope that in this case the collective bias of three individuals rather than one has helped to provide a certain degree of balance. A number of writings originally selected for inclusion were omitted because of space limitation or failure to secure permission to reprint.