Search (56 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Hypertext"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Ramarapu, N.: ¬The impact of hypertext versus sequential information presentation on decision making : a conceptual model (1996) 0.01 
    0.0091703655 = product of:
  0.027511096 = sum of:
    0.027511096 = product of:
      0.05502219 = sum of:
        0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 5512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05502219 = score(doc=5512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5512)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    24.10.1996 19:57:22
  2. Diaz, P.; Aedo, I.; Panetsos, F.: Labyrinth, an abstract model for hypermedia applications : Description of its static components (1997) 0.01 
    0.0091703655 = product of:
  0.027511096 = sum of:
    0.027511096 = product of:
      0.05502219 = sum of:
        0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 3318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05502219 = score(doc=3318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information systems. 22(1997) no.8, S.447-464
  3. Maislin, S.: Ripping out the pages (2000) 0.01 
    0.008621985 = product of:
  0.025865955 = sum of:
    0.025865955 = product of:
      0.05173191 = sum of:
        0.05173191 = weight(_text_:web in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05173191 = score(doc=220,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    When the Web was invented, it was touted as a novel nonlinear medium for the written word. No longer would we be constrained by linear presentations! Hyperlinks would allow us to jump haphazardly from page to page, chapter to chapter, idea to idea! Texts would no longer need to run from beginning to end! This is misleading. A printed book is also multidimensional and potentially nonlinear. We can open it to any page, from any other page, for any reason. We can open several books at once. In fact, what makes a book special is its combination of linear structure (the order of the words) and nonlinear physicality (the bound papers). This linear/nonlinear duality is enhanced further by the index, which maps linearly sequenced pages in a nonlinear, informationally ordered structure (architecture). In truth, the online environment is crippled by an absence of linear structure. Imagine selecting a hard cover book, tearing off the covers, ripping pages into small pieces, and throwing them in a box. That box is like a computer file system, and the paper scraps are Web documents. Only one scrap can be retrieved from the box at a time, and it must be replaced before another can be accessed. Page numbers are meaningless. Global context is destroyed. And without page numbers or context, what happens to the index?
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  4. Karampiperis, P.; Sampson, D.: Supporting accessible hypermedia in web-based educational systems : defining an accessibility application profile for learning resources (2004) 0.01 
    0.008447785 = product of:
  0.025343355 = sum of:
    0.025343355 = product of:
      0.05068671 = sum of:
        0.05068671 = weight(_text_:web in 5924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05068671 = score(doc=5924,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 5924, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The design and development of web-based educational systems for people with special abilities have recently attracted the attention of the research community. However, although a number of systems that claim to meet accessibility needs and preferences are proposed, most of them are typically supported by hypermedia and multimedia educational content that is specially designed for the user targeted group. Such approaches prevent their user groups (both learners and their tutors) from accessing other available resources. Therefore, it is important to be able to built generic e-learning systems that would allow the reuse of existing learning resources in different accessibility demanding applications. To this end, in this article we propose a methodology for defining an accessibility application profile that captures the accessibility properties of learning objects in a standard form and we examine its application to the IEEE Learning Object Metadata (LOM) standard.
  5. Baoming, Z.: Authoring a hypertext database : experiences with HyperPAD (1993) 0.01 
    0.0080240695 = product of:
  0.024072208 = sum of:
    0.024072208 = product of:
      0.048144415 = sum of:
        0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048144415 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 45(1993) no.1, S.19-22
  6. Kim, S.H.; Eastman, C.M.: ¬An experiment on node size in a hypermedia system (1999) 0.01 
    0.0080240695 = product of:
  0.024072208 = sum of:
    0.024072208 = product of:
      0.048144415 = sum of:
        0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048144415 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 9:35:20
  7. Westland, J.C.: Some conditions for cost efficiency in hypermedia (1998) 0.01 
    0.006877774 = product of:
  0.020633321 = sum of:
    0.020633321 = product of:
      0.041266643 = sum of:
        0.041266643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041266643 = score(doc=3292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    7. 3.1999 14:22:45
  8. Petrou, C.; Martakos, D.; Hadjiefthymiades, S.: Adding semantics to hypermedia towards link's enhancements and dynamic linking (1997) 0.01 
    0.005973486 = product of:
  0.017920459 = sum of:
    0.017920459 = product of:
      0.035840917 = sum of:
        0.035840917 = weight(_text_:web in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035840917 = score(doc=734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Most existing hypermedia authoring systems incorporate facilities for the creation of static links between pieces of information, termed nodes. Such links usually support only browsing activities over the hypermedia web, carrying little or no information about the conceptual relationship the nodes might have. Thus indecision occurs: the reader of the hypermedia can traverse a link but has no indication what link to choose and what he might expect from the traversal. At the same time, the creation of these links requires a great effort from the author, moreover if there are certain criteria that guide linking. This paper presents a two-layered hypermedia semantic model that enriches the semantic links, and alsoprovides the means for dynamic link creation. To accomplish these objectives, we adopt the use of fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic as the mathematical framework for link characterization and dynamic link creation. Some aspects of a prototype system, named Platon, are also presented
  9. Lima, G.A.B. de Oliveira: Conceptual modeling of hypertexts : methodological proposal for the management of semantic content in digital libraries (2012) 0.01 
    0.005973486 = product of:
  0.017920459 = sum of:
    0.017920459 = product of:
      0.035840917 = sum of:
        0.035840917 = weight(_text_:web in 451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035840917 = score(doc=451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=451)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This research is focused on the continuation of the Hypertext Map prototype implementation - MHTX, proposed by Lima, (2004), with the general objective of transforming the MHTX into a semantic content management product facilitating navigation in context supported by customizable software that is easy to use, through high end desktop/web interfaces that sustain the operation of its functions. Besides, these studies aim, in the long run, to achieve the simplification of the information organization, access and recovery processes in digital libraries, making archive management by authors, content managers and information professionals possible.
  10. Carmel, E.; Crawford, S.; Chen, H.: Browsing in hypertext : a cognitive study (1992) 0.01 
    0.0057314783 = product of:
  0.017194435 = sum of:
    0.017194435 = product of:
      0.03438887 = sum of:
        0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 7469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03438887 = score(doc=7469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics. 22(1992) no.5, S.865-884
  11. Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012) 0.01 
    0.0057314783 = product of:
  0.017194435 = sum of:
    0.017194435 = product of:
      0.03438887 = sum of:
        0.03438887 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03438887 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:39:23
  12. Ihadjadene, M.; Bouché, R.; Zâafrani, R.: ¬The dynamic nature of searching and browsing on Web-OPACs : the CATHIE experience (2000) 0.00 
    0.004977905 = product of:
  0.014933716 = sum of:
    0.014933716 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = weight(_text_:web in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867431 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  13. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.00 
    0.004977905 = product of:
  0.014933716 = sum of:
    0.014933716 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = weight(_text_:web in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867431 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  14. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.00 
    0.004977905 = product of:
  0.014933716 = sum of:
    0.014933716 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = weight(_text_:web in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867431 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  15. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A concept-map thesaurus as a knowledge-based hypertext interface to a bibliographic database (1990) 0.00 
    0.004977905 = product of:
  0.014933716 = sum of:
    0.014933716 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = weight(_text_:web in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867431 = score(doc=2481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  16. Ferreira, R.S.; Graça Pimentel, M. de; Cristo, M.: ¬A wikification prediction model based on the combination of latent, dyadic, and monadic features (2018) 0.00 
    0.004977905 = product of:
  0.014933716 = sum of:
    0.014933716 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = weight(_text_:web in 4119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867431 = score(doc=4119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Considering repositories of web documents that are semantically linked and created in a collaborative fashion, as in the case of Wikipedia, a key problem faced by content providers is the placement of links in the articles. These links must support user navigation and provide a deeper semantic interpretation of the content. Current wikification methods exploit machine learning techniques to capture characteristics of the concepts and its associations. In previous work, we proposed a preliminary prediction model combining traditional predictors with a latent component which captures the concept graph topology by means of matrix factorization. In this work, we provide a detailed description of our method and a deeper comparison with a state-of-the-art wikification method using a sample of Wikipedia and report a gain up to 13% in F1 score. We also provide a comprehensive analysis of the model performance showing the importance of the latent predictor component and the attributes derived from the associations between the concepts. Moreover, we include an analysis that allows us to conclude that the model is resilient to ambiguity without including a disambiguation phase. We finally report the positive impact of selecting training samples from specific content quality classes.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 6

Themes