-
Kautto, V.: Classing and indexing : a comparative time study (1992)
0.01
0.011628827 = product of:
0.023257654 = sum of:
0.023257654 = product of:
0.06977296 = sum of:
0.06977296 = weight(_text_:v in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06977296 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.008012209 = product of:
0.016024418 = sum of:
0.016024418 = product of:
0.04807325 = sum of:
0.04807325 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04807325 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.0070106825 = product of:
0.014021365 = sum of:
0.014021365 = product of:
0.042064093 = sum of:
0.042064093 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042064093 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26