-
Reich, P.; Biever, E.J.: Indexing consistency : The input/output function of thesauri (1991)
0.05
0.04724407 = product of:
0.09448814 = sum of:
0.09448814 = product of:
0.18897627 = sum of:
0.18897627 = weight(_text_:e.j in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18897627 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3063777 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9783883 = idf(docFreq=111, maxDocs=44218)
0.043903794 = queryNorm
0.6168082 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9783883 = idf(docFreq=111, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.011896716 = product of:
0.023793433 = sum of:
0.023793433 = product of:
0.047586866 = sum of:
0.047586866 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047586866 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15374361 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043903794 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.010409626 = product of:
0.020819252 = sum of:
0.020819252 = product of:
0.041638505 = sum of:
0.041638505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041638505 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15374361 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043903794 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26