-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.04
0.044645958 = product of:
0.089291915 = sum of:
0.089291915 = sum of:
0.035024762 = weight(_text_:c in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035024762 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.018169671 = weight(_text_:h in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018169671 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13238595 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.036097478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036097478 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.03
0.028370366 = product of:
0.05674073 = sum of:
0.05674073 = product of:
0.0851111 = sum of:
0.05603962 = weight(_text_:c in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603962 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.029071473 = weight(_text_:h in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029071473 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13238595 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.8, S.459-462
-
Braam, R.R.; Bruil, J.: Quality of indexing information : authors' views on indexing of their articles in chemical abstracts online CA-file (1992)
0.02
0.01994052 = product of:
0.03988104 = sum of:
0.03988104 = product of:
0.15952416 = sum of:
0.15952416 = weight(_text_:author's in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15952416 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.358089 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Studies the quality of subject indexing by Chemical Abstracts Indexing Service by confronting authors with the particular indexing terms attributed to their computer, for 270 articles published in 54 journals, 5 articles out of each journal. Responses (80%) indicate the superior quality of keywords, both as content descriptors and as retrieval tools. Author judgements on these 2 different aspects do not always converge, however. CAS's indexing policy to cover only 'new' aspects is reflected in author's judgements that index lists are somewhat incomplete, in particular in the case of thesaurus terms (index headings). The large effort expanded by CAS in maintaining and using a subject thesuaurs, in order to select valid index headings, as compared to quick and cheap keyword postings, does not lead to clear superior quality of thesaurus terms for document description nor in retrieval. Some 20% of papers were not placed in 'proper' CA main section, according to authors. As concerns the use of indexing data by third parties, in bibliometrics, users should be aware of the indexing policies behind the data, in order to prevent invalid interpretations
-
Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020)
0.02
0.01994052 = product of:
0.03988104 = sum of:
0.03988104 = product of:
0.15952416 = sum of:
0.15952416 = weight(_text_:author's in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15952416 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.358089 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.01
0.0144389905 = product of:
0.028877981 = sum of:
0.028877981 = product of:
0.08663394 = sum of:
0.08663394 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08663394 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Gregor, D.; Mandel, C.: Cataloging must change! (1991)
0.01
0.014009906 = product of:
0.028019812 = sum of:
0.028019812 = product of:
0.08405943 = sum of:
0.08405943 = weight(_text_:c in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08405943 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
McCarthy, C.: ¬The realibility factor in subject access (1986)
0.01
0.011674921 = product of:
0.023349842 = sum of:
0.023349842 = product of:
0.070049524 = sum of:
0.070049524 = weight(_text_:c in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070049524 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.381109 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs (2006)
0.01
0.011557583 = product of:
0.023115166 = sum of:
0.023115166 = product of:
0.0693455 = sum of:
0.0693455 = weight(_text_:c in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0693455 = score(doc=235,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper examines main problems of semantic indexing taking into consideration the connection with the needs of scientific research, in particular in the field of Social Sciences. Multi-modal indexing approach, which allows researchers to find documents according to different dimensions of research, is described. Request-oriented indexing and Pragmatic approach are also discussed and, finally, the possibility of assuming as fundamental principle, in indexing, C. S. Peirce theory of Abduction, is outlined.
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.009625995 = product of:
0.01925199 = sum of:
0.01925199 = product of:
0.057755966 = sum of:
0.057755966 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057755966 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995)
0.01
0.009339937 = product of:
0.018679874 = sum of:
0.018679874 = product of:
0.05603962 = sum of:
0.05603962 = weight(_text_:c in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603962 = score(doc=3833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.008422745 = product of:
0.01684549 = sum of:
0.01684549 = product of:
0.05053647 = sum of:
0.05053647 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05053647 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.01
0.008422745 = product of:
0.01684549 = sum of:
0.01684549 = product of:
0.05053647 = sum of:
0.05053647 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05053647 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.01
0.0072194953 = product of:
0.0144389905 = sum of:
0.0144389905 = product of:
0.04331697 = sum of:
0.04331697 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04331697 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.01
0.0072194953 = product of:
0.0144389905 = sum of:
0.0144389905 = product of:
0.04331697 = sum of:
0.04331697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04331697 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995)
0.01
0.007004953 = product of:
0.014009906 = sum of:
0.014009906 = product of:
0.042029716 = sum of:
0.042029716 = weight(_text_:c in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042029716 = score(doc=3609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mann, T.: 'Cataloging must change!' and indexer consistency studies : misreading the evidence at our peril (1997)
0.01
0.007004953 = product of:
0.014009906 = sum of:
0.014009906 = product of:
0.042029716 = sum of:
0.042029716 = weight(_text_:c in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042029716 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An earlier article ('Cataloging must change' by D. Gregor and C. Mandel in: Library journal 116(1991) no.6, S.42-47) has popularized the belief that there is low consistency (only 10-20% agreement) among subject cataloguers in assigning LCSH. Because of this alleged lack og consistency, the article suggests, cataloguers 'can be more accepting in variations in subject choices' in copy cataloguing. Argues that this inference is based on a serious misreading of previous studies of indexer consistency. The 10-20% figure actually derives from studies of people trying to guess the same natural language key words, precisely in the absence of vocabulary control mechanisms such as thesauri or LCSH. Concludes that sources cited fail support their conclusion and some directly contradict it. Raises the concern that a naive acceptance by the library profession of the 10-20% claim can only have negative consequences for the quality of subject cataloguing created, and accepted throughout the country
-
Rodriguez Bravo, B.: ¬The visibility of women in indexing languages (2006)
0.01
0.007004953 = product of:
0.014009906 = sum of:
0.014009906 = product of:
0.042029716 = sum of:
0.042029716 = weight(_text_:c in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042029716 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Lin, Y,-l.; Trattner, C.; Brusilovsky, P.; He, D.: ¬The impact of image descriptions on user tagging behavior : a study of the nature and functionality of crowdsourced tags (2015)
0.01
0.0066043334 = product of:
0.013208667 = sum of:
0.013208667 = product of:
0.039626 = sum of:
0.039626 = weight(_text_:c in 2159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039626 = score(doc=2159,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18380444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.21558782 = fieldWeight in 2159, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2159)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Crowdsourcing has emerged as a way to harvest social wisdom from thousands of volunteers to perform a series of tasks online. However, little research has been devoted to exploring the impact of various factors such as the content of a resource or crowdsourcing interface design on user tagging behavior. Although images' titles and descriptions are frequently available in image digital libraries, it is not clear whether they should be displayed to crowdworkers engaged in tagging. This paper focuses on offering insight to the curators of digital image libraries who face this dilemma by examining (i) how descriptions influence the user in his/her tagging behavior and (ii) how this relates to the (a) nature of the tags, (b) the emergent folksonomy, and (c) the findability of the images in the tagging system. We compared two different methods for collecting image tags from Amazon's Mechanical Turk's crowdworkers-with and without image descriptions. Several properties of generated tags were examined from different perspectives: diversity, specificity, reusability, quality, similarity, descriptiveness, and so on. In addition, the study was carried out to examine the impact of image description on supporting users' information seeking with a tag cloud interface. The results showed that the properties of tags are affected by the crowdsourcing approach. Tags from the "with description" condition are more diverse and more specific than tags from the "without description" condition, while the latter has a higher tag reuse rate. A user study also revealed that different tag sets provided different support for search. Tags produced "with description" shortened the path to the target results, whereas tags produced without description increased user success in the search task.
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.01
0.0060162465 = product of:
0.012032493 = sum of:
0.012032493 = product of:
0.036097478 = sum of:
0.036097478 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036097478 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18659793 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991)
0.01
0.0059956852 = product of:
0.0119913705 = sum of:
0.0119913705 = product of:
0.03597411 = sum of:
0.03597411 = weight(_text_:h in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03597411 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13238595 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.053285837 = queryNorm
0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 42(1991) H.5, S.337-344 (T.1); 42(1991) H.6, S.405-411 (T.2)
