Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Mainzer, K.: Computernetze und virtuelle Realität : Leben in der Wissensgesellschaft (1999) 0.02
    0.01770704 = product of:
      0.03541408 = sum of:
        0.03541408 = product of:
          0.07082816 = sum of:
            0.07082816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07082816 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 19:22:51
  2. Boyd, A.: Information disparity : research and measurement challenges in an interconnected world (2004) 0.02
    0.016454415 = product of:
      0.03290883 = sum of:
        0.03290883 = product of:
          0.06581766 = sum of:
            0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06581766 = score(doc=665,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the proliferation of new information channels such as the Web, e-mail and wireless, it is becoming increasingly important to understand the impact of these technologies within information-seeking and retrieval contexts. This issue of Aslib Proceedings presents research that begins to address the notion of "information disparity". It aims to weave a common thread between the challenges of reconciling disparate information needs in an environment complicated by fragmented or disparate data sources. This article lists several emerging trends that should begin to challenge traditional notions of our research field.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Information disparity: research and measurement challenges"
  3. Wissenschaftler fordern 'Open Access' : Berliner Erklärung (2003) 0.01
    0.0141656315 = product of:
      0.028331263 = sum of:
        0.028331263 = product of:
          0.056662526 = sum of:
            0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056662526 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am 22. Oktober die folgende »Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen« (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz in Berlin. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.
  4. Kelton, K.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Wallace, W.A.: Trust in digital information (2008) 0.01
    0.014103786 = product of:
      0.028207572 = sum of:
        0.028207572 = product of:
          0.056415144 = sum of:
            0.056415144 = weight(_text_:research in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056415144 = score(doc=1365,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Trust in information is developing into a vitally important topic as the Internet becomes increasingly ubiquitous within society. Although many discussions of trust in this environment focus on issues like security, technical reliability, or e-commerce, few address the problem of trust in the information obtained from the Internet. The authors assert that there is a strong need for theoretical and empirical research on trust within the field of information science. As an initial step, the present study develops a model of trust in digital information by integrating the research on trust from the behavioral and social sciences with the research on information quality and human- computer interaction. The model positions trust as a key mediating variable between information quality and information usage, with important consequences for both the producers and consumers of digital information. The authors close by outlining important directions for future research on trust in information science and technology.
  5. "Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen" unterzeichnet (2003) 0.01
    0.012394927 = product of:
      0.024789855 = sum of:
        0.024789855 = product of:
          0.04957971 = sum of:
            0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04957971 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am Mittwoch, den 22. Oktober, die "Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen" (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz im Berlin-Dahlemer Harnack-Haus der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.
  6. Nahl, D.: Learning the Internet and the structure of information behavior (1998) 0.01
    0.01163503 = product of:
      0.02327006 = sum of:
        0.02327006 = product of:
          0.04654012 = sum of:
            0.04654012 = weight(_text_:research in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04654012 = score(doc=2023,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Internet use research has focused on user surveys and novice learner studies, using survey, experimental, and ethnographic methods. They share a focus on user-based categories in the affective and cognitve domains. Information behaviour has an affective component that influences the direction of cognitive processing through hierarchically organized goals, characterized by both an individual and a cultural component. Research in human-computer interaction is evolving a user-centred methodology for system design and instruction that focuses on integrating affective and cognitive user variables to increase productivity, creativity, and human growth
  7. Eiriksson, J.M.; Retsloff, J.M.: Librarians in the 'information age' : promoter of change or provider of stability? (2005) 0.01
    0.010016615 = product of:
      0.02003323 = sum of:
        0.02003323 = product of:
          0.04006646 = sum of:
            0.04006646 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04006646 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:23:22
  8. Wathen, C.N.; Burkell, J.: Believe it or not : factors influencing credibility on the Web (2002) 0.01
    0.009972882 = product of:
      0.019945765 = sum of:
        0.019945765 = product of:
          0.03989153 = sum of:
            0.03989153 = weight(_text_:research in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03989153 = score(doc=201,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reviews selected literature related to the credibility of information, including (1) the general markers of credibility, and how different source, message and receiver characteristics affect people's perceptions of information; (2) the impact of information medium on the assessment of credibility; and (3) the assessment of credibility in the context of information presented on the Internet. The objective of the literature review is to synthesize the current state of knowledge in this area, develop new ways to think about how people interact with information presented via the Internet, and suggest next steps for research and practical applications. The review examines empirical evidence, key reviews, and descriptive material related to credibility in general, and in terms of on-line media. A general discussion of credibility and persuasion and a description of recent work on the credibility and persuasiveness of computer-based applications is presented. Finally, the article synthesizes what we have learned from various fields, and proposes a model as a framework for much-needed future research in this area
  9. Kaeser, E.: ¬Das postfaktische Zeitalter (2016) 0.01
    0.007512461 = product of:
      0.015024922 = sum of:
        0.015024922 = product of:
          0.030049844 = sum of:
            0.030049844 = weight(_text_:22 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030049844 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Es gibt Daten, Informationen und Fakten. Wenn man mir eine Zahlenreihe vorsetzt, dann handelt es sich um Daten: unterscheidbare Einheiten, im Fachjargon: Items. Wenn man mir sagt, dass diese Items stündliche Temperaturangaben der Aare im Berner Marzilibad bedeuten, dann verfüge ich über Information - über interpretierte Daten. Wenn man mir sagt, dies seien die gemessenen Aaretemperaturen am 22. August 2016 im Marzili, dann ist das ein Faktum: empirisch geprüfte interpretierte Daten. Dieser Dreischritt - Unterscheiden, Interpretieren, Prüfen - bildet quasi das Bindemittel des Faktischen, «the matter of fact». Wir alle führen den Dreischritt ständig aus und gelangen so zu einem relativ verlässlichen Wissen und Urteilsvermögen betreffend die Dinge des Alltags. Aber wie schon die Kurzcharakterisierung durchblicken lässt, bilden Fakten nicht den Felsengrund der Realität. Sie sind kritikanfällig, sowohl von der Interpretation wie auch von der Prüfung her gesehen. Um bei unserem Beispiel zu bleiben: Es kann durchaus sein, dass man uns zwei unterschiedliche «faktische» Temperaturverläufe der Aare am 22. August 2016 vorsetzt.
  10. Simonitsch, P.: Kontrolle ist besser - aber für wen? : In Genf wurde der Weltinformationsgipfel eröffnet - China gibt Widerstand gegen Pressefreiheit auf (2003) 0.01
    0.0061974637 = product of:
      0.012394927 = sum of:
        0.012394927 = product of:
          0.024789855 = sum of:
            0.024789855 = weight(_text_:22 in 1985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024789855 = score(doc=1985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.289 vom 11.12.2003, S.22
  11. Savolainen, R.: Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums (2011) 0.01
    0.005876578 = product of:
      0.011753156 = sum of:
        0.011753156 = product of:
          0.023506312 = sum of:
            0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023506312 = score(doc=4477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This exploratory study contributes to research on relevance assessment by specifying criteria that are used in the judgment of information quality and credibility in Internet discussion forums. To this end, 4,739 messages posted to 160 Finnish discussion threads were analyzed. Of the messages, 20.5% contained explicit judgments of the quality of information and credibility in other messages. In the judgments, the forum participants employed both positive criteria such as validity of information and negative criteria such as dishonesty in argumentation. In the evaluation of the quality of the message's information content, the most frequently used criteria pertained to the usefulness, correctness, and specificity of information. In the judgment of information credibility, the main criteria included the reputation, expertise, and honesty of the author of the message. Since Internet discussion forums tend to emphasize the role of disputational discourse questioning rather than accepting the views presented by others, mainly negative criteria were used in the judgments. The generality of our claims is limited because we chose forums that focused on sensitive and value-laden topics; future work could explore credibility and quality judgment in other forums and forumlike venues such as question and answer sites as well as exploring how quality and credibility judgments interact with other aspects of forum use.