Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Internet Privacy : eine multidisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme / a multidisciplinary analysis: acatech STUDIE (2012) 0.01
    0.009297967 = product of:
      0.032542884 = sum of:
        0.016760327 = weight(_text_:u in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016760327 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
        0.015782557 = weight(_text_:j in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015782557 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Publikationen/Projektberichte/acatech_STUDIE_Internet_Privacy_WEB.pdf. Enthält Auszüge aus: Capurro, R., M, Eldred u. D. Nagel: Digital Whoness: Identity, Privacy and Freedom in the Cyberworld. Frankfurt 2013. Vgl. http://www.capurro.de/floridi.html.
    Editor
    Buchmann, J.
  2. Henn, W.: Wehe, die Computer sagen einmal "ich" : Gefahr durch KI (2018) 0.00
    0.004053712 = product of:
      0.028375983 = sum of:
        0.028375983 = product of:
          0.056751966 = sum of:
            0.056751966 = weight(_text_:w in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056751966 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  3. Rieck, M.: Einige Gedanken zur deutschen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.00
    0.0035914986 = product of:
      0.025140489 = sum of:
        0.025140489 = weight(_text_:u in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025140489 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutsche Informationswissenschaft existiert nur dem Namen nach. Eine eher sporadisch stattfindende fachliche Diskussion dreht sich ausschließlich um praktische Probleme, die Theorie wird weitgehend ignoriert. Kaum jemand ist bereit, über den Tellerrand zu blicken. Es wird versucht, die Informationswissenschaft zur Geisteswissenschaft zu erklären. Die Naturwissenschaften werden ausgeschlossen. Bibliotheks-, Dokumentations- und Archivwissenschaft sollen in der Informationswissenschaft aufgehen. Diese Vorgänge leiteten u. a. das Ende der wissenschaftlichen Dokumentation ein. In diesem Artikel wird dargestellt, wie die Informationswissenschaft aufgebaut werden kann und welche Themen sie behandeln sollte. Dabei wird davon ausgegangen, dass es sich um die "Wissenschaft von der Information" handelt. So muss es Grundlage sein, zu klären, worum es sich bei dem Phänomen "Information" handelt. Es werden verschiedene Ansätze betrachtet und ausgewertet, beginnend mit Shannons Kommunikationstheorie bis hin zur Physik. Der Weg zu einer möglichen Definition wird ebenso behandelt, wie die Eigenschaften der Information und ihre Abgrenzung zu Daten und Wissen.
  4. Griesbaum, J.: Bürger, Suchverfahren und Analyse-Algorithmen in der politischen Meinungsbildung : Einen breiten gesellschaftlichen Diskurs sicherstellen (2019) 0.00
    0.003381977 = product of:
      0.023673838 = sum of:
        0.023673838 = weight(_text_:j in 5373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023673838 = score(doc=5373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5373)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Reception of externalized knowledge : a constructivistic model based on Popper's Three Worlds and Searle's Collective Intentionality (2019) 0.00
    0.0032429697 = product of:
      0.022700787 = sum of:
        0.022700787 = product of:
          0.045401573 = sum of:
            0.045401573 = weight(_text_:w in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045401573 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  6. Lehmann, K.: Unser Gehirn kartiert auch Beziehungen räumlich (2015) 0.00
    0.0029929157 = product of:
      0.020950409 = sum of:
        0.020950409 = weight(_text_:u in 2146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020950409 = score(doc=2146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2146)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. Original unter: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627315005243: "Morais Tavares, R., A. Mendelsohn, Y.Grossman, C.H. Williams, M. Shapiro, Y. Trope u. D. Schiller: A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain" in. Neuron 87(2015) no.1, S,231-243. [Deciphering the neural mechanisms of social behavior has propelled the growth of social neuroscience. The exact computations of the social brain, however, remain elusive. Here we investigated how the human br ain tracks ongoing changes in social relationships using functional neuroimaging. Participants were lead characters in a role-playing game in which they were to find a new home and a job through interactions with virtual cartoon characters. We found that a two-dimensional geometric model of social relationships, a "social space" framed by power and affiliation, predicted hippocampal activity. Moreover, participants who reported better social skills showed stronger covariance between hippocampal activity and "movement" through "social space." The results suggest that the hippocampus is crucial for social cognition, and imply that beyond framing physical locations, the hippocampus computes a more general, inclusive, abstract, and multidimensional cognitive map consistent with its role in episodic memory.].
  7. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Rezeption externalisierten Wissens : ein konstruktivistisches Modell auf der Basis von Poppers Drei Welten und Searles Kollektiver Intentionalität (2018) 0.00
    0.0028375986 = product of:
      0.019863188 = sum of:
        0.019863188 = product of:
          0.039726377 = sum of:
            0.039726377 = weight(_text_:w in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039726377 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  8. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.00
    0.0013692075 = product of:
      0.009584452 = sum of:
        0.009584452 = product of:
          0.019168904 = sum of:
            0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019168904 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    

Languages

Types

Classifications