Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Andersen, J.: Analyzing the role of knowledge organization in scholarly communication : an inquiry into the intellectual foundation of knowledge organization (2004) 0.03
    0.028484624 = product of:
      0.113938496 = sum of:
        0.113938496 = weight(_text_:communication in 2348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113938496 = score(doc=2348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.5724753 = fieldWeight in 2348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2348)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  2. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Reception of externalized knowledge : a constructivistic model based on Popper's Three Worlds and Searle's Collective Intentionality (2019) 0.02
    0.01898975 = product of:
      0.075959 = sum of:
        0.075959 = weight(_text_:communication in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075959 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We provide a model for the reception of knowledge from externalized information sources. The model is based on a cognitive understanding of information processing and draws up ideas of an exchange of information in communication processes. Karl Popper's three-world theory with its orientation on falsifiable scientific knowledge is extended by John Searle's concept of collective intentionality. This allows a consistent description of externalization and reception of knowledge including scientific knowledge as well as everyday knowledge.
  3. Allo, P.; Baumgaertner, B.; D'Alfonso, S.; Fresco, N.; Gobbo, F.; Grubaugh, C.; Iliadis, A.; Illari, P.; Kerr, E.; Primiero, G.; Russo, F.; Schulz, C.; Taddeo, M.; Turilli, M.; Vakarelov, O.; Zenil, H.: ¬The philosophy of information : an introduction (2013) 0.01
    0.010070836 = product of:
      0.040283345 = sum of:
        0.040283345 = weight(_text_:communication in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040283345 = score(doc=3380,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.2024006 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In April 2010, Bill Gates gave a talk at MIT in which he asked: 'are the brightest minds working on the most important problems?' Gates meant improving the lives of the poorest; improving education, health, and nutrition. We could easily add improving peaceful interactions, human rights, environmental conditions, living standards and so on. Philosophy of Information (PI) proponents think that Gates has a point - but this doesn't mean we should all give up philosophy. Philosophy can be part of this project, because philosophy understood as conceptual design forges and refines the new ideas, theories, and perspectives that we need to understand and address these important problems that press us so urgently. Of course, this naturally invites us to wonder which ideas, theories, and perspectives philosophers should be designing now. In our global information society, many crucial challenges are linked to information and communication technologies: the constant search for novel solutions and improvements demands, in turn, changing conceptual resources to understand and cope with them. Rapid technological development now pervades communication, education, work, entertainment, industrial production and business, healthcare, social relations and armed conflicts. There is a rich mine of philosophical work to do on the new concepts created right here, right now.
  4. Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004) 0.00
    0.004683813 = product of:
      0.018735252 = sum of:
        0.018735252 = product of:
          0.037470505 = sum of:
            0.037470505 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037470505 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 1.2022 10:22:18
  5. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.00
    0.003122542 = product of:
      0.012490168 = sum of:
        0.012490168 = product of:
          0.024980336 = sum of:
            0.024980336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024980336 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)