Search (40 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Almeida, C.C. de; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Reis, D.M. dos: Peircean semiotics and subject indexing : contributions of speculative grammar and pure logic (2013) 0.00 
    0.0049582394 = product of:
  0.009916479 = sum of:
    0.009916479 = product of:
      0.029749434 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The semiotics of C. S. Peirce presents fundamental concepts to discover aspects of the indexing process, including representation and classes of signs. However, we still know little of its theoretical potential for subject indexing. We believe that the main difficulty in the proposals to understand the process of subject indexing based on Peircean semiotics stems from an incomplete interpretation of his semiotic system. This paper attempts to describe the contributions of Peircean semiotics to subject indexing. First, we analyze some of the concepts of the branches of semiotics, after which, we discuss strategies for conceptual approximation. Secondly, and aiming to raise the level of interlocution between the areas, we intend to argue that subject indexing is an inferential process, as explained by the second branch of semiotics. Thus, we seek to go beyond the level of speculative grammar, the first branch of semiotics, to forge a closer link with pure or critical logic, the second branch. We conclude that the indexer's work does not produce a mere reflection of what already exists in documents, but involves an instigating action to discover, through the inferential matrix, the meaning of a text in order to find the subject and the most a ppropriate subject added entry to the information system.
  2. Gnoli, C.; Ridi, C.R.: Unified Theory of Information, hypertextuality and levels of reality : without, within, and withal knowledge management (2014) 0.00 
    0.0049582394 = product of:
  0.009916479 = sum of:
    0.009916479 = product of:
      0.029749434 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=1796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Dinneen, J.D.; Brauner, C.: Practical and philosophical considerations for defining information as well-formed, meaningful data in the information sciences (2015) 0.00 
    0.0049582394 = product of:
  0.009916479 = sum of:
    0.009916479 = product of:
      0.029749434 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. O'Connor, C.; Weatherall, J.O.: ¬The misinformation age : how false ideas spread (2019) 0.00 
    0.0049582394 = product of:
  0.009916479 = sum of:
    0.009916479 = product of:
      0.029749434 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 5818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=5818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5818)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Kaeser, E.: ¬Das postfaktische Zeitalter (2016) 0.00 
    0.004336061 = product of:
  0.008672122 = sum of:
    0.008672122 = product of:
      0.026016364 = sum of:
        0.026016364 = weight(_text_:22 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026016364 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Es gibt Daten, Informationen und Fakten. Wenn man mir eine Zahlenreihe vorsetzt, dann handelt es sich um Daten: unterscheidbare Einheiten, im Fachjargon: Items. Wenn man mir sagt, dass diese Items stündliche Temperaturangaben der Aare im Berner Marzilibad bedeuten, dann verfüge ich über Information - über interpretierte Daten. Wenn man mir sagt, dies seien die gemessenen Aaretemperaturen am 22. August 2016 im Marzili, dann ist das ein Faktum: empirisch geprüfte interpretierte Daten. Dieser Dreischritt - Unterscheiden, Interpretieren, Prüfen - bildet quasi das Bindemittel des Faktischen, «the matter of fact». Wir alle führen den Dreischritt ständig aus und gelangen so zu einem relativ verlässlichen Wissen und Urteilsvermögen betreffend die Dinge des Alltags. Aber wie schon die Kurzcharakterisierung durchblicken lässt, bilden Fakten nicht den Felsengrund der Realität. Sie sind kritikanfällig, sowohl von der Interpretation wie auch von der Prüfung her gesehen. Um bei unserem Beispiel zu bleiben: Es kann durchaus sein, dass man uns zwei unterschiedliche «faktische» Temperaturverläufe der Aare am 22. August 2016 vorsetzt.
  6. Cole, C.: ¬The consciousness' drive : information need and the search for meaning (2018) 0.00 
    0.004207206 = product of:
  0.008414412 = sum of:
    0.008414412 = product of:
      0.025243234 = sum of:
        0.025243234 = weight(_text_:c in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025243234 = score(doc=480,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16169086 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 71(2020) no.1, S.118-120 (Heidi Julien). - Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Cole, C.: A rebuttal of the book review of the book titled "The Consciousness' Drive: Information Need and the Search for Meaning": mapping cognitive and document spaces. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.2, S.242.
  7. Speer, A.: Wovon lebt der Geist? (2016) 0.00 
    0.0041154684 = product of:
  0.008230937 = sum of:
    0.008230937 = product of:
      0.02469281 = sum of:
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Forschung und Lehre. 23(2016) H.9, S.xx-xx
  8. Hochschule im digitalen Zeitalter : Informationskompetenz neu begreifen - Prozesse anders steuern (2012) 0.00 
    0.0040880768 = product of:
  0.0081761535 = sum of:
    0.0081761535 = product of:
      0.02452846 = sum of:
        0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02452846 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2012 17:22:26
  9. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.00 
    0.0040880768 = product of:
  0.0081761535 = sum of:
    0.0081761535 = product of:
      0.02452846 = sum of:
        0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02452846 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.00 
    0.0040880768 = product of:
  0.0081761535 = sum of:
    0.0081761535 = product of:
      0.02452846 = sum of:
        0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02452846 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Hidalgo, C.: Why information grows : the evolution of order, from atoms to economies (2015) 0.00 
    0.0039665913 = product of:
  0.007933183 = sum of:
    0.007933183 = product of:
      0.023799548 = sum of:
        0.023799548 = weight(_text_:c in 2154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023799548 = score(doc=2154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2154)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Bates, M.J.: Concepts for the study of information embodiment (2018) 0.00 
    0.0039665913 = product of:
  0.007933183 = sum of:
    0.007933183 = product of:
      0.023799548 = sum of:
        0.023799548 = weight(_text_:c in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023799548 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0002. Vgl. auch den Kommentar in: Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied): that is not the question. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.114-117. (Opinion paper) Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.
  13. Boom, H. van den: Was ist Information? : zu den Grundlagen der Designforschung (2014) 0.00 
    0.0036010346 = product of:
  0.0072020693 = sum of:
    0.0072020693 = product of:
      0.021606207 = sum of:
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 5424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=5424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5424)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Rezeption externalisierten Wissens : ein konstruktivistisches Modell auf der Basis von Poppers Drei Welten und Searles Kollektiver Intentionalität (2018) 0.00 
    0.0036010346 = product of:
  0.0072020693 = sum of:
    0.0072020693 = product of:
      0.021606207 = sum of:
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Auch unter: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21248.07688. Auch in: International Forum on Information. 44(2019) H.4, S.25-35 (http://lamb.viniti.ru/sid2/sid2free?sid2=J18357463. Zunächst auch: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41860839 bzw. http://www.viniti.ru/products/publications/pub-134048#issues [http://catalog.viniti.ru/srch_result.aspx?IRL=FETCH+QUERY%3d2603664+OBJ%3d01bsmm7z+STYLE%3dFull1&TYP=FULL1]).
  15. Riethmüller, J.: ¬Der graue Schwan : Prolegomena zum Wissen der Wissensgesellschaft (2012) 0.00 
    0.0030866012 = product of:
  0.0061732023 = sum of:
    0.0061732023 = product of:
      0.018519606 = sum of:
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=4275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. unter: http://www.rkm-journal.de/archives/16340 (H.-D. Kübler)
  16. Weidenbach, V.: Weiß und gold oder blau und schwarz : welche Farbe hat das Kleid? (2015) 0.00 
    0.0030866012 = product of:
  0.0061732023 = sum of:
    0.0061732023 = product of:
      0.018519606 = sum of:
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5663)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. dazu den Artikel: Seth, A.K.: Unsere inneren Universen. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.2, S.18-24.
  17. Hartel, J.: ¬The case against Information and the Body in Library and Information Science (2018) 0.00 
    0.0024791197 = product of:
  0.0049582394 = sum of:
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.014874717 = sum of:
        0.014874717 = weight(_text_:c in 5523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014874717 = score(doc=5523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 5523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5523)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0018. Vgl. auch den Kommentar in: Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied): that is not the question. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.114-117. (Opinion paper) Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.
  18. Capurro, R.; Treude, L.: Information, Zeichen, Kompetenz : Fragen an Rafael Capurro zu aktuellen und grundsätzlichen Fragen der Informationswissenschaft von Linda Treude (2011) 0.00 
    0.0020577342 = product of:
  0.0041154684 = sum of:
    0.0041154684 = product of:
      0.012346405 = sum of:
        0.012346405 = weight(_text_:h in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012346405 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.1, S.37-42
  19. Gleick, J.: ¬Die Information : Geschichte, Theorie, Flut (2011) 0.00 
    0.0020577342 = product of:
  0.0041154684 = sum of:
    0.0041154684 = product of:
      0.012346405 = sum of:
        0.012346405 = weight(_text_:h in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012346405 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2012, H.6, S.94-96 (R. Pilous): " ... Bei aller Materialfülle nimmt Gleick einen technokratischen Standpunkt ein - so konsequent, dass er Gedanken zum Verstehen von Information durch den Menschen oder zur Philosophie selbst dort weglässt, wo sie sich aufdrängen. Seiner leidenschaftlich vorgebrachten Vision, die moderne Physik auf eine Art Quanteninformationstheorie zu reduzieren, fehlt eine gründliche Reflexion ebenso wie seiner Darstellung der Theorie der Meme. Und dennoch: Gleicks Projekt einer Gesamtdarstellung des Informationsbegriffs ist mutig, bisher einmalig und im Wesentlichen gelungen."
  20. Neuser, W.: Wissen begreifen : zur Selbstorganisation von Erfahrung, Handlung und Begriff (2013) 0.00 
    0.0020577342 = product of:
  0.0041154684 = sum of:
    0.0041154684 = product of:
      0.012346405 = sum of:
        0.012346405 = weight(_text_:h in 3973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012346405 = score(doc=3973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 3973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 64(2013) H.4, S.232-233 (W. Löw): "Der verdienstvolle Vorsatz Neusers durch begriffstheoretische Untersuchung einen Wissensbegriff zu entwickeln, der einen neuen Schlüssel zum Verständnis ideengeschichtlicher Epochen und kultureller Traditionen bietet, erreicht mich leider nicht. Ich kann auch nur soweit folgen, dass Wissen ein sich selbst organisierendes und stabilisierendes System ist. Dass aber der Mensch seine Mittelpunktstellung als denkendes Subjekt verloren hat, darf bestritten werden (auch wenn manche Alltagserfahrung dem Autor und nicht mir Recht gibt). Oder will der Autor dem alten, ironisch gemeinten Buchtitel von Weizenbaum "Die Macht der Computer und die Ohnmacht der Vernunft" (dt. Suhrkamp, 1978) doch weiter zum Durchbruch verhelfen? Immerhin sagt Neuser, was von den menschlichen Akteuren bleibe, sei das Individuum, welches sein individuelles Wissen aus der Interaktion mit Allgemeinwissen bezieht. Diesbezüglich hat Weizenbaum einmal zu mir gesagt, dass das Beste das eigene Denken ist. Vielleicht ein Rat für eine Nachauflage, den außerordentlich interdisziplinär denkenden Joseph Weizenbaum in die ansonsten beachtliche Bibliographie mit aufzunehmen. Sie wird auch ein Grund dafür sein, dass das Buch einen Platz in meinem Bücherschrank finden wird." 2017 in einer 2. Aufl. erschienen.

Authors

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 17

Types

  • a 26
  • m 13
  • el 5
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications