Search (149 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Leggett, J.J.; Schnase, J.L.; Kacmar, C.J.: Hypertext for learning (1990) 0.06
    0.058888067 = product of:
      0.11777613 = sum of:
        0.11777613 = product of:
          0.23555227 = sum of:
            0.23555227 = weight(_text_:learning in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23555227 = score(doc=2932,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                1.0253129 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Designing hypermedia for learning. NATO advanced research workshop on designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning, Rottenburg, 3.-8.7.1989. Proceedings. Ed.: D.H. Jonassen u. H. Mandl
  2. Jonassen, D.H.; Grabinger, R.S.: Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning (1990) 0.06
    0.058888067 = product of:
      0.11777613 = sum of:
        0.11777613 = product of:
          0.23555227 = sum of:
            0.23555227 = weight(_text_:learning in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23555227 = score(doc=508,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                1.0253129 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Designing hypermedia for learning. NATO advanced research workshop on designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning, Rottenburg, 3.-8.7.1989. Proceedings. Ed.: D.H. Jonassen u. H. Mandl
  3. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.06
    0.057496607 = product of:
      0.114993215 = sum of:
        0.114993215 = sum of:
          0.08013651 = weight(_text_:learning in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08013651 = score(doc=1344,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.34881854 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.03485671 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03485671 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This review introduces a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking to provide a theoretical basis for: - empirical studies that improve our understanding of the cognitive process and mechanisms of sensemaking and integration of results of such studies; - education in critical thinking and sensemaking skills; - the design of sensemaking assistant tools that support and guide users. The paper reviews and extends existing sensemaking models with ideas from learning and cognition. It reviews literature on sensemaking models in human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive system engineering, organizational communication, and library and information sciences (LIS), learning theories, cognitive psychology, and task-based information seeking. The model resulting from this synthesis moves to a stronger basis for explaining sensemaking behaviors and conceptual changes. The model illustrates the iterative processes of sensemaking, extends existing models that focus on activities by integrating cognitive mechanisms and the creation of instantiated structure elements of knowledge, and different types of conceptual change to show a complete picture of the cognitive processes of sensemaking. The processes and cognitive mechanisms identified provide better foundations for knowledge creation, organization, and sharing practices and a stronger basis for design of sensemaking assistant systems and tools.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  4. Bruce, C.S.: ¬The relational approach : a new model for information literacy (1997) 0.05
    0.054913066 = product of:
      0.10982613 = sum of:
        0.10982613 = sum of:
          0.06799808 = weight(_text_:learning in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06799808 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.29598233 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
          0.04182805 = weight(_text_:22 in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04182805 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The dominant approaches in information literacy scholarship and research conflict with constructivist approaches to learning preferred by educators. Proposes an alternative, 'relational', model of information literacy which reveals a picture of information literacy that is constructed in terms of varying relations between people and information. These relations are captured in 7 categories, graphially conveyed through awareness structures, which together represent information literacy as it is experienced. Information literacy education may be interpreted as helping people to experience information use differently. This model demonstrates that: the meanings associated with information literacy by information professionals may not be shared by users; the experienced meaning of information literacy is fluid and contextually bound; and, understanding of information literacy and related concepts will deepen if the experience of information users is given priority in research. Proposes an agenda for information literacy research based upon the relational approach
    Source
    New review of information and library research. 3(1997), S.1-22
  5. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.05
    0.054913066 = product of:
      0.10982613 = sum of:
        0.10982613 = sum of:
          0.06799808 = weight(_text_:learning in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06799808 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.29598233 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
          0.04182805 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04182805 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  6. Mayes, T.: Hypermedia and cognitive tools (1995) 0.05
    0.048580173 = product of:
      0.09716035 = sum of:
        0.09716035 = product of:
          0.1943207 = sum of:
            0.1943207 = weight(_text_:learning in 3289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1943207 = score(doc=3289,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.8458399 = fieldWeight in 3289, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hypermedia and multimedia have been placed rather uncritically at the centre of current developments in learning technology. This paper seeks to ask some fundamental questions about how learning is best supported by hypermedia, and concludes that the most successful aspects are not those normally emphasized. A striking observation is that the best learning experience is enjoyed by hypermedia courseware authors rather that students. This is understandable from a constructivist view of learning, in which the key aim is to engage the learner in carrying out a task which leads to better comprehension. Deep learning is a by-product of comprehension. The paper discusses some approaches to designing software - cognitive tools for learning - which illustrate the constructivist approach
  7. Duffy, T.M.; Knuth, R.A.: Hypermedia and instruction : where is the match? (1990) 0.05
    0.048081905 = product of:
      0.09616381 = sum of:
        0.09616381 = product of:
          0.19232762 = sum of:
            0.19232762 = weight(_text_:learning in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19232762 = score(doc=2347,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.83716446 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Designing hypermedia for learning. NATO advanced research workshop on designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning, Rottenburg, 3.-8.7.1989. Proceedings. Ed.: D.H. Jonassen u. H. Mandl
  8. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05
    0.047671758 = product of:
      0.095343515 = sum of:
        0.095343515 = product of:
          0.28603053 = sum of:
            0.28603053 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28603053 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4362298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  9. Kozma, R.B.: Learning with media (1991) 0.05
    0.04533205 = product of:
      0.0906641 = sum of:
        0.0906641 = product of:
          0.1813282 = sum of:
            0.1813282 = weight(_text_:learning in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1813282 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.7892862 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. McGuire, E.G.: Knowledge representation and construction in hypermedia environments (1996) 0.05
    0.04533205 = product of:
      0.0906641 = sum of:
        0.0906641 = product of:
          0.1813282 = sum of:
            0.1813282 = weight(_text_:learning in 7272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1813282 = score(doc=7272,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.7892862 = fieldWeight in 7272, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hypermedia information systems, because of their inherent qualities of nonlinearity and associative linking, offer the potential of facilitating enhanced knowledge representation and construction for users. These capabilities will be more fully realized if hypermedia information systems are developed and implemented based on constructivist learning theory. Examines the qualities of hypermedia systems that enable them to facilitate learning, discusses the background of current learning theories and provides a brief view of a possible hypermedia system based on constructivist learning principles that could be developed through the use of intellegent autonomous agents
  11. Hammond, N.: Tailoring hypertext for the learner (1991) 0.04
    0.039665546 = product of:
      0.07933109 = sum of:
        0.07933109 = product of:
          0.15866219 = sum of:
            0.15866219 = weight(_text_:learning in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15866219 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.6906254 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cognitive tools for learning. Ed.: P.A. Kommers et al
  12. Caraballo, R.; Angel, L.: ¬An experimental study to investigate the effects of computer animation on the understanding and retention of selected levels of learning outcomes (1985) 0.04
    0.039665546 = product of:
      0.07933109 = sum of:
        0.07933109 = product of:
          0.15866219 = sum of:
            0.15866219 = weight(_text_:learning in 7755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15866219 = score(doc=7755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.6906254 = fieldWeight in 7755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. fwt: Wie das Gehirn Bilder 'liest' (1999) 0.04
    0.039435867 = product of:
      0.078871734 = sum of:
        0.078871734 = product of:
          0.15774347 = sum of:
            0.15774347 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15774347 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:01:22
  14. Recker, M.M.: Cognitive media types for multimedia information access (1995) 0.04
    0.03925871 = product of:
      0.07851742 = sum of:
        0.07851742 = product of:
          0.15703484 = sum of:
            0.15703484 = weight(_text_:learning in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15703484 = score(doc=4792,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.68354195 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a theoretical framework for organizing information and activities in educational hypermedia systems. Focuses on the content that can be represented within a physical media, rather than the physical media itself. Proposes a theory of cognitive media types based on the inferential and learning processes of human users. Presents an implemented computer system, called AlgoNet, that supports hypermedia information access and constructive learning activities for self paced learning in computer and engineering disciplines
  15. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.04
    0.03660871 = product of:
      0.07321742 = sum of:
        0.07321742 = sum of:
          0.04533205 = weight(_text_:learning in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04533205 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.19732155 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.027885368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027885368 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.03
    0.034051254 = product of:
      0.06810251 = sum of:
        0.06810251 = product of:
          0.20430753 = sum of:
            0.20430753 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20430753 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4362298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  17. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.03
    0.034051254 = product of:
      0.06810251 = sum of:
        0.06810251 = product of:
          0.20430753 = sum of:
            0.20430753 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20430753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4362298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  18. Horton, F.W.: Some speculations on knowing, learning and artificial intelligence (1995) 0.03
    0.03399904 = product of:
      0.06799808 = sum of:
        0.06799808 = product of:
          0.13599616 = sum of:
            0.13599616 = weight(_text_:learning in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13599616 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.59196466 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Bransford, J.D.; Johnson, M.K.: Contextual prerequisites for understanding : some investigations of comprehension and recall (1972) 0.03
    0.03399904 = product of:
      0.06799808 = sum of:
        0.06799808 = product of:
          0.13599616 = sum of:
            0.13599616 = weight(_text_:learning in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13599616 = score(doc=5419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.59196466 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior. 61(1972), S.717-726
  20. Heit, E.: Knowledge and concept learning (1997) 0.03
    0.03399904 = product of:
      0.06799808 = sum of:
        0.06799808 = product of:
          0.13599616 = sum of:
            0.13599616 = weight(_text_:learning in 1976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13599616 = score(doc=1976,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.59196466 = fieldWeight in 1976, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1976)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 88
  • d 60
  • de 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 25
  • el 8
  • s 5
  • d 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…