Search (223 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.23
    0.22831932 = product of:
      0.53274506 = sum of:
        0.07610644 = product of:
          0.2283193 = sum of:
            0.2283193 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2283193 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2283193 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2283193 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.2283193 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2283193 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  2. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.16
    0.1630852 = product of:
      0.38053215 = sum of:
        0.05436174 = product of:
          0.1630852 = sum of:
            0.1630852 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1630852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1630852 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1630852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.1630852 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1630852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.16
    0.1630852 = product of:
      0.38053215 = sum of:
        0.05436174 = product of:
          0.1630852 = sum of:
            0.1630852 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1630852 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1630852 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1630852 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.1630852 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1630852 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34821346 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Rubin, V.L.: Disinformation and misinformation triangle (2019) 0.06
    0.056203403 = product of:
      0.13114128 = sum of:
        0.03718255 = weight(_text_:processing in 5462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03718255 = score(doc=5462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 5462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5462)
        0.04992717 = weight(_text_:digital in 5462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04992717 = score(doc=5462,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.3081681 = fieldWeight in 5462, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5462)
        0.044031553 = weight(_text_:techniques in 5462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044031553 = score(doc=5462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.24335694 = fieldWeight in 5462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5462)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to treat disinformation and misinformation (intentionally deceptive and unintentionally inaccurate misleading information, respectively) as a socio-cultural technology-enabled epidemic in digital news, propagated via social media. Design/methodology/approach The proposed disinformation and misinformation triangle is a conceptual model that identifies the three minimal causal factors occurring simultaneously to facilitate the spread of the epidemic at the societal level. Findings Following the epidemiological disease triangle model, the three interacting causal factors are translated into the digital news context: the virulent pathogens are falsifications, clickbait, satirical "fakes" and other deceptive or misleading news content; the susceptible hosts are information-overloaded, time-pressed news readers lacking media literacy skills; and the conducive environments are polluted poorly regulated social media platforms that propagate and encourage the spread of various "fakes." Originality/value The three types of interventions - automation, education and regulation - are proposed as a set of holistic measures to reveal, and potentially control, predict and prevent further proliferation of the epidemic. Partial automated solutions with natural language processing, machine learning and various automated detection techniques are currently available, as exemplified here briefly. Automated solutions assist (but not replace) human judgments about whether news is truthful and credible. Information literacy efforts require further in-depth understanding of the phenomenon and interdisciplinary collaboration outside of the traditional library and information science, incorporating media studies, journalism, interpersonal psychology and communication perspectives.
  5. Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989) 0.04
    0.040875565 = product of:
      0.14306447 = sum of:
        0.10411114 = weight(_text_:processing in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10411114 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
        0.038953334 = product of:
          0.07790667 = sum of:
            0.07790667 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07790667 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
  6. Dillon, A.: Spatial-semantics : how users derive shape from information space (2000) 0.04
    0.035146713 = product of:
      0.12301349 = sum of:
        0.06310088 = weight(_text_:processing in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06310088 = score(doc=4602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
        0.059912607 = weight(_text_:digital in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059912607 = score(doc=4602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    User problems with large information spaces multiply in complexity when we enter the digital domain. Virtual information environments can offer 3D representations, reconfigurations, and access to large databases that may overwhelm many users' abilities to filter and represent. As a result, user frequently experience disorienting in navigation large digital spaces to locate an duse information. To date, the research response has been predominantly based on the analysis of visual navigational aids that might support users' bottom-up processing of the spatial display. In the present paper, an emerging alternative is considered that places greater emphasis on the top-down application of semantic knowledge by the user gleaned from their experiences within the sociocognitive context of information production and consumption. A distinction between spatial and semantic cues is introduced, and existing empirical data are reviewed that highlight the differential reliance on spatial or semantic information as the domain expertise of the user increases. The conclusion is reached that interfaces for shaping information should be built on an increasing analysis of users' semantic processing
  7. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.03
    0.034902792 = product of:
      0.081439845 = sum of:
        0.042067256 = weight(_text_:processing in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042067256 = score(doc=3077,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.2530092 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
        0.028243072 = weight(_text_:digital in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028243072 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
        0.011129524 = product of:
          0.022259047 = sum of:
            0.022259047 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022259047 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  8. Hernon, P.: Disinformation and misinformation through the Internet : findings of an exploratory study (1995) 0.03
    0.031734157 = product of:
      0.111069545 = sum of:
        0.04942538 = weight(_text_:digital in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04942538 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
        0.06164417 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06164417 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    There are in creased opportunities for disinformation and misinformation to occur on the Internet and for students, faculty, and others to unknowingly reference them. The extent of inaccurary over the Internet was investigated in 1994 by means of a questionnaire involving 16 participants which covered: individuals' views on the accuracy of information available through the Internet; their reactions to the creation of disinformation and misinformation; their awareness of instances of disinformation and misinformation on the Internet; and their views on the official or authentic version or dource. Findings indictae a need to develop digital signatures and other authenticating techniques
  9. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.03
    0.03047277 = product of:
      0.10665469 = sum of:
        0.08717802 = weight(_text_:techniques in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08717802 = score(doc=1296,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.48182213 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
        0.019476667 = product of:
          0.038953334 = sum of:
            0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038953334 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  10. Allen, B.L.: Visualization and cognitve abilities (1998) 0.03
    0.026850509 = product of:
      0.09397677 = sum of:
        0.07728249 = weight(_text_:processing in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07728249 = score(doc=2340,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.4648076 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
        0.016694285 = product of:
          0.03338857 = sum of:
            0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03338857 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The idea of obtaining subject access to information by being able to visualize an information space, and to navigate through that space toward useful or interesting information, is attractive and plausible. However, this approach to subject access requires additional cognitive processing associated with the interaction of cognitive facilities that deal with concepts and those that deal with space. This additional cognitive processing may cause problems for users, particularly in dealing with the dimensions, the details, and the symbols of information space. Further, it seems likely that different cognitive abilities are associated with conceptual and spatial cognition. As a result, users who deal well with subject access using traditional conceptual approaches may experience difficulty in using visualization and navigation. An experiment designed to investigate the effects of different cognitive abilities on the use of both conceptual and spatial representations of information is outlined
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  11. Dillon, A.; Vaughan, M.: "It's the journey and the destination" : shape and the emergent property of genre in evaluating digital documents (1997) 0.03
    0.025535632 = product of:
      0.089374706 = sum of:
        0.06989804 = weight(_text_:digital in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06989804 = score(doc=2889,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.019476667 = product of:
          0.038953334 = sum of:
            0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038953334 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Navigation is a limited metaphor for hypermedia and website use that potentially constraints our understanding of human-computer interaction. Traces the emergence of the navigation metaphor and the emprical analysis of navigation measures in usability evaluation before suggesting an alternative concept to consider: shape. The shape concept affords a richer analytic tool for considering humans' use of digital documents and invokes social level analysis of meaning that are shared among discourse communities who both produce and consume the information resources
    Date
    6. 2.1999 20:10:22
  12. Cooke, N.J.: Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques (1994) 0.03
    0.025160888 = product of:
      0.17612621 = sum of:
        0.17612621 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17612621 = score(doc=2245,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.9734278 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Information on knowledge elicitation methods is widely scattered across the fields of psychology, business management, education, counselling, cognitive science, linguistics, philosophy, knowledge engineering and anthropology. Identifies knowledge elicitation techniques and the associated bibliographic information. Organizes the techniques into categories on the basis of methodological similarity. Summarizes for each category of techniques strengths, weaknesses and recommends applications
  13. Klir, G.J.; Folger, T.A.: Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information (1988) 0.02
    0.021950537 = product of:
      0.15365376 = sum of:
        0.15365376 = product of:
          0.3073075 = sum of:
            0.3073075 = weight(_text_:mathematics in 6039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3073075 = score(doc=6039,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25945482 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                1.1844356 = fieldWeight in 6039, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6039)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    PRECIS
    Mathematics / Fuzzy sets
    Subject
    Mathematics / Fuzzy sets
  14. Weaver, W.: ¬The mathematics of communication (1949) 0.02
    0.020695165 = product of:
      0.14486615 = sum of:
        0.14486615 = product of:
          0.2897323 = sum of:
            0.2897323 = weight(_text_:mathematics in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2897323 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25945482 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                1.1166966 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  15. Zimmer, H.D.: Modalitätsspezifische Systeme der Repräsentation und Verarbeitung von Information (1993) 0.02
    0.018215656 = product of:
      0.1275096 = sum of:
        0.1275096 = weight(_text_:processing in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1275096 = score(doc=3294,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.7668934 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    It is discussed what is underlying the assumption of modality-specific processing systems and representations. Starting from the information processing approach relevant aspects of mental representations and their physiological realizations are discussed. Then 3 different forms of modality-specific systems are distinguished: as stimulus specific processing, as specific informational formats, and as modular part systems. Parallel to that 3 kinds of analogue systems are differentiated: as holding an analogue-relation, as having a specific informational format and as a set of specific processing constraints. These different aspects of the assumption of modality-specific systems are demonstrated in the example of visual and spatial information processing. It is concluded that postulating information-specific systems is not a superfluous assumption, but it is necessary, and even more likely it is inevitable consequence of an optimization of stimulus processing
  16. Verdi, M.P.; Kulhavy, R.W.; Stock, W.A.; Rittscho, K.A.; Savenye, W.: Why maps improve memory for text : the influence of structural information on working-memory operations (1993) 0.02
    0.0175181 = product of:
      0.061313346 = sum of:
        0.04461906 = weight(_text_:processing in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04461906 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
        0.016694285 = product of:
          0.03338857 = sum of:
            0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03338857 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test how associated verbal and spatial stimuli are processed in memory, undergraduates studied a reference map as either an intact unit or as a series of individual features, and read a text containing facts related to map features. In Addition, the map was presented either before or after reading the text. Seeing the intact map prior to the text led to better recall of both map information and facts from the text. These results support a dual coding modell, where stimuli such as maps possess a retrieval advantage because they allow simultaneous representation in working memory. This advantage occurs because information from the map can be used to cue retrieval of associated verbal facts, without exceeding the processing constraints of the memorial system
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:18:18
  17. Quillian, M.R.: Semantic memory (1968) 0.02
    0.016997738 = product of:
      0.11898416 = sum of:
        0.11898416 = weight(_text_:processing in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11898416 = score(doc=1478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Semantic information processing. Ed.: M. Minsky
  18. Derr, R.L.: ¬The concept of information in ordinary discourse (1985) 0.02
    0.016997738 = product of:
      0.11898416 = sum of:
        0.11898416 = weight(_text_:processing in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11898416 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 21(1985) no.6, S.489-500
  19. Wersig, G.: Information science : the study of postmodern knowledge usage (1993) 0.02
    0.016997738 = product of:
      0.11898416 = sum of:
        0.11898416 = weight(_text_:processing in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11898416 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.2, S.229-240
  20. Cremmins, E.T.: Value-added processing of representational and speculative information using cognitive skills (1992) 0.02
    0.016997738 = product of:
      0.11898416 = sum of:
        0.11898416 = weight(_text_:processing in 7515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11898416 = score(doc=7515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 7515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7515)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    

Languages

  • e 150
  • d 68
  • de 1
  • f 1
  • pt 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 176
  • m 40
  • el 9
  • s 7
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications