Search (53 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Hümmer, C.: TELOTA - Aspekte eines Wissensportals für geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung (2010) 0.02
    0.017190583 = product of:
      0.091683105 = sum of:
        0.07570162 = sum of:
          0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01597718 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.031400457 = queryNorm
              0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
          0.05972444 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05972444 = score(doc=3745,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                0.031400457 = queryNorm
              0.3854811 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
        0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005345665 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
        0.010635821 = product of:
          0.021271642 = sum of:
            0.021271642 = weight(_text_:22 in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021271642 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    TELOTA (The Electronic Life of the Academy) ist eine Initiative der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, die es sich zur Aufgabe gemacht hat, in verstärktem Maße die Möglichkeiten und Chancen der Informationstechnologie für die Akademie und ihre Forschungsvorhaben zu explorieren und umzusetzen. TELOTA betreut die Akademievorhaben in Hinblick auf die Einführung von elektronischen Arbeits- und Publikationsstrategien und trifft deshalb auf sehr unterschiedliche Bedürfnisse und Ausgangssituationen. Nach einer ersten Projektphase, in der vor allem die Breite der Möglichkeiten des elektronischen Mediums exploriert wurden, widmete sich TELOTA zwischen März 2007 und Dezember 2008 der Entwicklung von projektübergreifenden Lösungen für die Bereiche Digitale Edition, Personendatenbanken und elektronische Wörterbücher. Für die Zukunft gibt es erste Ansätze, die elektronischen Ressourcen der Akademie zu einem vernetzten Wissensportal für geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagenforschung auszubauen. Aufgaben und Ziele von TELOTA Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Arbeit der TELOTA-Initiative der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (BBAW). Auf Initiative der "Arbeitsgruppe elektronisches Publizieren" ins Leben gerufen, widmet sich TELOTA seit 2002 der Aufgabe, moderne Informationstechnologie bewusst, geplant und nachhaltig für die Belange der BBAW nutzbar zu machen. Diese Aufgabe versteht sich sowohl im Sinne eines verstärkten Einsatzes zur Unterstützung des Forschungsprozesses als auch im Sinne einer kostenfreien Online-Präsentation von Daten und Ergebnissen für die interessierte Öffentlichkeit. Darüber hinaus soll die verstärkte "Digitalisierung" der Akademievorhaben auch den wissenschaftlichen Austausch und die Kommunikation unter Fachwissenschaftlern erleichtern und fördern (vgl. den Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe "Elektronisches Publizieren" an den Vorstand 2001). Das Akronym TELOTA steht - zusammenfassend für diese Aufgabengebiete - für "The Electronic Life of the Academy".
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  2. Münch, V.: In der Mathematik hat die Zukunft der wissenschaftlichen Informationsvermittlung begonnen : zbMATH.org und swMATH sind Vorboten der modernen Wissenschaftskommunikation (2014) 0.01
    0.01125096 = product of:
      0.06000512 = sum of:
        0.0138366455 = product of:
          0.027673291 = sum of:
            0.027673291 = weight(_text_:online in 1537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027673291 = score(doc=1537,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.29038906 = fieldWeight in 1537, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1537)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007559912 = weight(_text_:information in 1537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007559912 = score(doc=1537,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1537, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1537)
        0.038608566 = weight(_text_:software in 1537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038608566 = score(doc=1537,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 1537, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1537)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Das neu aufgelegte Online-Portal zbMATH.org aus dem Produktportfolio für Mathematik und Informatik von FIZ Karlsruhe führt zu den Publikationen und den Softwaretools der Mathematik weltweit. Mit Social Media Funktionen für die wissenschaftliche Kommunikation und offener Schnittstelle zur Kataloganbindung.
    Content
    Dazu ein Leserbrief von Bernd Wegner: "aufgrund meiner jahrelangen Beschäftigung mit Mathematik-Information und meiner Kenntnis des aktuellen Angebots von zbMATH sehe ich mich gezwungen, einige Dinge richtig zustellen. Der Artikel beginnt mit einem Zitat von Professor Dr. Dr. h.c. Gert-Martin Greuel: "Bibliographische Informationsdienste in der Mathematik können nicht länger nur Metadaten-Repositorien sein..." In keiner Phase war dieser Mathematik-Informationsdienst, der von mir von 1974 bis 2011 geleitet wurde, "nur ein Metadaten-Repositorium". Bis in die 70er Jahre war das Zentralblatt ein gedruckter Literaturdokumentationsdienst für die Mathematik. Publiziert wurden Rezensionen von international anerkannten Experten, die natürlich durch die entsprechenden bibliographischen Daten und den Zugang zu den Rezensionen vereinfachende Registerbände ergänzt wurden. Mit der Integration in das FIZ Karlsruhe begann das Angebot vom Zentralblatt als relationale Datenbank mit allen Recherche-Möglichkeiten, die mit dem damaligen Stand der Technik möglich waren. Mit der fortschreitenden Entwicklung von Computern wurde dieses Angebot erweitert und technisch modernisiert. Es entstand ein eigenes Produktionssystem für die Mathematik-Datenbank in Kombination mit einer exzellenten Recherche-Software, verteilte Inputsysteme wurden eingerichtet und der Zugang durch internationale Spiegel der Datenbank verbessert. Der gleichzeitig stattfindende Wechsel von gedruckten zu elektronischen Publikationen führte zu einer ständig wachsenden Verlinkung der Datenbank mit elektronischen Angeboten bei Verlegern und Bibliotheken und einer Verlinkung der elektronischen Dokumente untereinander über deren Bibliographien." (B.I.T. online. 17 (2014) H.3, S.255)
    Form
    Software
    Source
    B.I.T. online. 17 (2014) H.2, S.126-134
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  3. Schweibenz, W.: ¬Eine erste Evaluation der Europeana : Wie Benutzer das "Look & Feel" des Prototypen der Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek beurteilen (2010) 0.01
    0.0111958785 = product of:
      0.08956703 = sum of:
        0.07898315 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 3933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07898315 = score(doc=3933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.44106317 = fieldWeight in 3933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3933)
        0.010583877 = weight(_text_:information in 3933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010583877 = score(doc=3933,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3933, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3933)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.5, S.277-284
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  4. Keßler, K.; Krüger, A.T.; Ghammad, Y.; Wulle, S.; Balke, W.-T.; Stump, K.: PubPharm - Der Fachinformationsdienst Pharmazie (2016) 0.01
    0.009097172 = product of:
      0.048518248 = sum of:
        0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005345665 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
        0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015872208 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
        0.027300376 = weight(_text_:software in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027300376 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Der Fachinformationsdienst (FID) Pharmazie verfolgt das Ziel, die Informationsinfrastruktur und die Literaturversorgung für die pharmazeutische Hochschulforschung nachhaltig zu verbessern. Das Projekt wird seit dem 1. Januar 2015 von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft gefördert. Eine Besonderheit stellt die Kooperation zwischen der Universitätsbibliothek Braunschweig und dem Institut für Informationssysteme (IfIS) der TU Braunschweig dar, wodurch aktuelle Forschung auf dem Gebiet der Informatik in die Implementierung innovativer FID-Dienste mündet. Im Zentrum des Projektes steht der nutzerzentrierte Aufbau einer erweiterbaren und personalisierbaren Informationsinfrastruktur. Das vom FID entwickelte Discovery System "PubPharm" zur pharmaziespezifischen Recherche basiert, als Weiterentwicklung des beluga-Systems der SUB Hamburg, auf der Open Source Software VuFind. Als Datengrundlage enthält es u.a. die Medline Daten, erweitert durch Normdaten, die unter anderem die Suche nach chemischen Strukturen erlauben. Gleichzeitig werden vom Institut für Informationssysteme innovative Suchmöglichkeiten basierend auf Narrativer Intelligenz untersucht und perspektivisch in das Retrieval des Discovery Systems eingebunden. Im Rahmen von sog. FID-Lizenzen bietet der FID Pharmazie Wissenschaftlern/innen Volltextzugriff auf pharmazeutische Fachzeitschriften. Bestandteil der Lizenzen ist das Recht zur Langzeitarchivierung. Bei deren technischer Umsetzung kooperiert der FID mit der TIB Hannover. Der FID Pharmazie koppelt seine Aktivitäten eng an die pharmazeutische Fachcommunity: unter anderem begleitet ein Fachbeirat die Entwicklungen. Im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit werden Nutzer/innen umfassend über die Angebote informiert, u.a. in Webcasts und im PubPharm Blog.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  5. Lee, J.H.; Wishkoski, R.; Aase, L.; Meas, P.; Hubbles, C.: Understanding users of cloud music services : selection factors, management and access behavior, and perceptions (2017) 0.01
    0.0084446985 = product of:
      0.045038395 = sum of:
        0.018474855 = weight(_text_:web in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018474855 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
        0.01069133 = weight(_text_:information in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01069133 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
        0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015872208 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Recent, rapid changes in technology have resulted in a proliferation of choices for music storage and access. Portable, web-enabled music devices are widespread, and listeners now enjoy a plethora of options regarding formats, devices, and access methods. Yet in this mobile music environment, listeners' access and management strategies for music collections are poorly understood, because behaviors surrounding the organization and retrieval of music collections have received little formal study. Our current research seeks to enrich our knowledge of people's music listening and collecting behavior through a series of systematic user studies. In this paper we present our findings from interviews involving 20 adult and 20 teen users of commercial cloud music services. Our results contribute to theoretical understandings of users' music information behavior in a time of upheaval in music usage patterns, and more generally, the purposes and meanings users ascribe to personal media collections in cloud-based systems. The findings suggest improvements to the future design of cloud-based music services, as well as to any information systems and services designed for personal media collections, benefiting both commercial entities and listeners.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1186-1200
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  6. Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010) 0.01
    0.0062921452 = product of:
      0.033558108 = sum of:
        0.0111840265 = product of:
          0.022368053 = sum of:
            0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022368053 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
        0.014890149 = product of:
          0.029780298 = sum of:
            0.029780298 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029780298 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access Repositorien sind Online-Archive für frei im Internet zugängliche Publikationen im Volltext. Open Access Materialien oder die Open Access Repositorien selbst sind allerdings nur unzureichend in zentrale Fachportale (z.B. virtuelle Fachbibliotheken) eingebunden. Der Beitrag stellt SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, einen disziplinären Open Access Volltextserver für die Sozialwissenschaften vor und zeigt wie dieser in das sozialwissenschaftliche Fachportal Sowiport integriert wird.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  7. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01
    0.0054967017 = product of:
      0.029315742 = sum of:
        0.00798859 = product of:
          0.01597718 = sum of:
            0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01597718 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01069133 = weight(_text_:information in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01069133 = score(doc=2891,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
        0.010635821 = product of:
          0.021271642 = sum of:
            0.021271642 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021271642 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to examine user tags that describe digitized archival collections in the field of humanities. A collection of 8,310 tags from a digital portal (Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship, NINES) was analyzed to find out what attributes of primary historical resources users described with tags. Tags were categorized to identify which tags describe the content of the resource, the resource itself, and subjective aspects (e.g., usage or emotion). The study's findings revealed that over half were content-related; tags representing opinion, usage context, or self-reference, however, reflected only a small percentage. The study further found that terms related to genre or physical format of a resource were frequently used in describing primary archival resources. It was also learned that nontextual resources had lower numbers of content-related tags and higher numbers of document-related tags than textual resources and bibliographic materials; moreover, textual resources tended to have more user-context-related tags than other resources. These findings help explain users' tagging behavior and resource interpretation in primary resources in the humanities. Such information provided through tags helps information professionals decide to what extent indexing archival and cultural resources should be done for resource description and discovery, and understand users' terminology.
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.5, S.1089-1104
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  8. Gore, E.; Bitta, M.D.; Cohen, D.: ¬The Digital Public Library of America and the National Digital Platform (2017) 0.00
    0.004896906 = product of:
      0.03917525 = sum of:
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.032760452 = weight(_text_:software in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032760452 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The Digital Public Library of America brings together the riches of America's libraries, archives, and museums, and makes them freely available to the world. In order to do this, DPLA has had to build elements of the national digital platform to connect to those institutions and to serve their digitized materials to audiences. In this article, we detail the construction of two critical elements of our work: the decentralized national network of "hubs," which operate in states across the country; and a version of the Hydra repository software that is tailored to the needs of our community. This technology and the organizations that make use of it serve as the foundation of the future of DPLA and other projects that seek to take advantage of the national digital platform.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  9. Müller, B.; Poley, C.; Pössel, J.; Hagelstein, A.; Gübitz, T.: LIVIVO - the vertical search engine for life sciences (2017) 0.00
    0.0045938045 = product of:
      0.036750436 = sum of:
        0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009258964 = score(doc=3368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
        0.027491473 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027491473 = score(doc=3368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The explosive growth of literature and data in the life sciences challenges researchers to keep track of current advancements in their disciplines. Novel approaches in the life science like the One Health paradigm require integrated methodologies in order to link and connect heterogeneous information from databases and literature resources. Current publications in the life sciences are increasingly characterized by the employment of trans-disciplinary methodologies comprising molecular and cell biology, genetics, genomic, epigenomic, transcriptional and proteomic high throughput technologies with data from humans, plants, and animals. The literature search engine LIVIVO empowers retrieval functionality by incorporating various literature resources from medicine, health, environment, agriculture and nutrition. LIVIVO is developed in-house by ZB MED - Information Centre for Life Sciences. It provides a user-friendly and usability-tested search interface with a corpus of 55 Million citations derived from 50 databases. Standardized application programming interfaces are available for data export and high throughput retrieval. The search functions allow for semantic retrieval with filtering options based on life science entities. The service oriented architecture of LIVIVO uses four different implementation layers to deliver search services. A Knowledge Environment is developed by ZB MED to deal with the heterogeneity of data as an integrative approach to model, store, and link semantic concepts within literature resources and databases. Future work will focus on the exploitation of life science ontologies and on the employment of NLP technologies in order to improve query expansion, filters in faceted search, and concept based relevancy rankings in LIVIVO.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  10. Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010) 0.00
    0.0043749274 = product of:
      0.03499942 = sum of:
        0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022169823 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
        0.012829596 = weight(_text_:information in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012829596 = score(doc=3967,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The Europeana Data Model (EDM) is a new approach towards structuring and representing data delivered to Europeana by the various contributing cultural heritage institutions. The model aims at greater expressivity and flexibility in comparison to the current Europeana Semantic Elements (ESE), which it is destined to replace. The design principles underlying the EDM are based on the core principles and best practices of the Semantic Web and Linked Data efforts to which Europeana wants to contribute. The model itself builds upon established standards like RDF(S), OAI-ORE, SKOS, and Dublin Core. It acts as a common top-level ontology which retains original data models and information perspectives while at the same time enabling interoperability. The paper elaborates on the aforementioned aspects and the design principles which drove the development of the EDM.
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  11. Nicholas, D.; Clark, D.; Rowlands, I.; Jamali, H.R.: Information on the go : a case study of Europeana mobile users (2013) 0.00
    0.004313981 = product of:
      0.03451185 = sum of:
        0.018474855 = weight(_text_:web in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018474855 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
        0.016036993 = weight(_text_:information in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016036993 = score(doc=961,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    According to estimates the mobile device will soon be the main platform for searching the web, and yet our knowledge of how mobile consumers use information, and how that differs from desktops/laptops users, is imperfect. The paper sets out to correct this through an analysis of the logs of a major cultural website, Europeana. The behavior of nearly 70,000 mobile users was examined over a period of more than a year and compared with that for PC users of the same site and for the same period. The analyses conducted include: size and growth of use, time patterns of use; geographical location of users, digital collections used; comparative information-seeking behavior using dashboard metrics, clustering of users according to their information seeking, and user satisfaction. The main findings were that mobile users were the fastest-growing group and will rise rapidly to a million by December 2012 and that their visits were very different in the aggregate from those arising from fixed platforms. Mobile visits could be described as being information "lite": typically shorter, less interactive, and less content viewed per visit. Use took a social rather than office pattern, with mobile use peaking at nights and weekends. The variation between different mobile devices was large, with information seeking on the iPad similar to that for PCs and laptops and that for smartphones very different indeed. The research further confirms that information-seeking behavior is platform-specific and the latest platforms are changing it all again. Websites will have to adapt.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1311-1322
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Gradmann, S.; Iwanowa, J.; Dröge, E.; Hennicke, S.; Trkulja, V.; Olensky, M.; Stein, C.; Struck, A.; Baierer, K.: Modellierung und Ontologien im Wissensmanagement : Erfahrungen aus drei Projekten im Umfeld von Europeana und des DFG-Exzellenzclusters Bild Wissen Gestaltung an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2013) 0.00
    0.0039052146 = product of:
      0.031241717 = sum of:
        0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022169823 = score(doc=904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=904)
        0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009071894 = score(doc=904,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 904, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=904)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Im Artikel werden laufende Arbeiten und Ergebnisse der Forschergruppe Wissensmanagement beschrieben. Diese entstanden vor allem durch die am Lehrstuhl Wissensmanagement angesiedelten Projekte Europeana v2.0, Digitised Manuscripts to Europeana (DM2E) sowie von Teilprojekten des vor kurzem gestarteten DFG-Exzellenzclusters Bild Wissen Gestaltung. Die Projekte befassen sich mit Spezialisierungen des Europeana Data Model, der Umwandlung von Metadaten in RDF und der automatisierten und nutzerbasierten semantischen Anreicherung dieser Daten auf Basis eigens entwickelter oder modifizierter Anwendungen sowie der Modellierung von Forschungsaktivitäten, welche derzeit auf die digitale Geisteswissenschaft zugeschnitten ist. Allen Projekten gemeinsam ist die konzeptionelle oder technische Modellierung von Informationsentitäten oder Nutzeraktivitäten, welche am Ende im Linked Data Web repräsentiert werden.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.2/3, S.127-136
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  13. Aksoy, C.; Can, F.; Kocberber, S.: Novelty detection for topic tracking (2012) 0.00
    0.0034667272 = product of:
      0.027733818 = sum of:
        0.018474855 = weight(_text_:web in 51) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018474855 = score(doc=51,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 51, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=51)
        0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 51) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009258964 = score(doc=51,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 51, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=51)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Multisource web news portals provide various advantages such as richness in news content and an opportunity to follow developments from different perspectives. However, in such environments, news variety and quantity can have an overwhelming effect. New-event detection and topic-tracking studies address this problem. They examine news streams and organize stories according to their events; however, several tracking stories of an event/topic may contain no new information (i.e., no novelty). We study the novelty detection (ND) problem on the tracking news of a particular topic. For this purpose, we build a Turkish ND test collection called BilNov-2005 and propose the usage of three ND methods: a cosine-similarity (CS)-based method, a language-model (LM)-based method, and a cover-coefficient (CC)-based method. For the LM-based ND method, we show that a simpler smoothing approach, Dirichlet smoothing, can have similar performance to a more complex smoothing approach, Shrinkage smoothing. We introduce a baseline that shows the performance of a system with random novelty decisions. In addition, a category-based threshold learning method is used for the first time in ND literature. The experimental results show that the LM-based ND method significantly outperforms the CS- and CC-based methods, and category-based threshold learning achieves promising results when compared to general threshold learning.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.777-795
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  14. Miedtke, E.: Antworten rund um die Uhr : Die Deutsche Internetbibliothek als kooperatives Angebot / Mitstreiter gesucht (2010) 0.00
    0.0031097005 = product of:
      0.024877604 = sum of:
        0.012781745 = product of:
          0.02556349 = sum of:
            0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 3500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02556349 = score(doc=3500,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3500, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 3500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012095859 = score(doc=3500,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3500, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3500)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Die Deutsche Internetbibliothek ist ein unabhängiges nichtkommerzielles Online-Auskunftsportal, das im wesentlichen zwei Dienstleistungen anbietet: eine kostenlose E-Mail-Auskunft zu allen Wissensfragen sowie einen umfangreichen und regelmäßig kontrollierten Linkkatalog für das Internet. Derzeit arbeiten 55 Öffentliche und wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken im deutschsprachigen Raum am Projekt mit. Weitere Mitstreiter werden gesucht. Warum sich das Engagement lohnt, zeigen der folgende Bericht sowie die eingestreuten Kommentare von langjährigen Mitarbeiterinnen.
    Series
    Lesesaal: Information digital
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  15. Müller, A.B.: Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek präsentiert erste Vollversion : acht Millionen Datensätze von mehr als 100 Einrichtungen online (2014) 0.00
    0.0031097005 = product of:
      0.024877604 = sum of:
        0.012781745 = product of:
          0.02556349 = sum of:
            0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 1514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02556349 = score(doc=1514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 1514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012095859 = score(doc=1514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1514)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Series
    Foyer: Digitale Information
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  16. Fortier, A.; Ménard, E.: Laying the ground for DOLMEN : offering a simple standardization starts with understanding what museums do (2017) 0.00
    0.0028869512 = product of:
      0.02309561 = sum of:
        0.0138366455 = product of:
          0.027673291 = sum of:
            0.027673291 = weight(_text_:online in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027673291 = score(doc=4132,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.29038906 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009258964 = score(doc=4132,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    For most museums, online access to their collections is still a challenge. In museum databases, descriptions include descriptive metadata, along with other information that is often irrelevant to the public. Information that would help users to navigate from an object to one sharing similar characteristics is often absent. The conceptual model developed by the International Committee for Documentation, CIDOC-CRM, which provides a formal structure for linking museum objects, is still not widely adopted by institutions, due to its complexity. This project aims to provide a simpler model that could be more easily adopted. For this phase of the project, a sample of 266 Canadian museums with humanities collections (archaeology, ethnology, history, fine and decorative arts) was identified. It is composed of every museum that, during the fall of 2016, was offering to the public at least a part of its collection online. From each museum, a minimum of ten objects was selected, ensuring that the variety of the collections was represented, and extracted the metadata used in the object descriptions. This inventory, which aimed to provide a comprehensive picture of what museums already offer in terms of metadata associated to their online collections, exposed a lack of standardization and interoperability.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  17. Digital libraries for cultural heritage : development, outcomes, and challenges from European perspectives (2017) 0.00
    0.002343212 = product of:
      0.018745696 = sum of:
        0.0060479296 = weight(_text_:information in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060479296 = score(doc=4679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
        0.012697767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012697767 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Series
    Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services ; 58
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  18. Frischmuth, F.; Schauerte, G.: Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek : eine erste Bilanz 2011-2015 (2015) 0.00
    0.0020001384 = product of:
      0.016001107 = sum of:
        0.009586309 = product of:
          0.019172618 = sum of:
            0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019172618 = score(doc=2528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=2528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Die Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (DDB) schafft über das Internet freien Zugang zum kulturellen und wissenschaftlichen Erbe Deutschlands, indem sie die digitalen Angebote deutscher Museen, Bibliotheken, Archive, Denkmalpflegeeinrichtungen, Mediatheken und Forschungsinstitutionen vernetzt und kostenfrei online zugänglich macht. Millionen von Büchern, Archivalien, Bildern, Skulpturen, Musikstücken und anderen Tondokumenten, Filmen und Noten sind so über ein zentrales Portal auffindbar. Gestartet als ein gemeinsam von Bund und Ländern gefördertes Projekt, hat die DDB ihre Aufbauphase inzwischen erfolgreich durchlaufen. Mit inzwischen etwa 17 Mio. nachgewiesenen Objekten von über 200 Partnern, einer modernen Benutzeroberfläche, einer aktiven Lieferbeziehung zu Europeana und einer zunehmenden Nutzung und Wahrnehmung in der deutschen und europäischen Öffentlichkeit wurden wesentliche Ziele erreicht. Der Artikel informiert über die Idee, Umsetzung sowie den bisher mit der DDB erreichten Stand. Des Weiteren gibt der Beitrag einen Ausblick auf die künftigen Herausforderungen und Entwicklungen über 2015 hinaus.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  19. Mensing, P.: Beispielhafter Vergleich und Analyse online verfügbarer digitaler Bilddatenbanken aus dem Bereich der Pomologie (2010) 0.00
    0.0019435626 = product of:
      0.015548501 = sum of:
        0.00798859 = product of:
          0.01597718 = sum of:
            0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 3579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01597718 = score(doc=3579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007559912 = weight(_text_:information in 3579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007559912 = score(doc=3579,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3579, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3579)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 2007 hat die GWLB gemeinsam mit der HAAB, der Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg und mehreren Stiftungen die Königliche Gartenbibliothek Herrenhausen erworben. Neben den textuellen Materialien enthält die Bibliothek auch viele nicht-textuelle Materialien wie Herbarien, Zeichnungen und auch Gouachen mit Abbildungen von Obstsorten aus der ehemaligen Obstbaumplantage. Nachdem in einem ebenfalls hier abgedruckten Aufsatz technische und inhaltliche Aspekte, die bei der Planung und Durchführung von Digitalisierungsprojekten von nicht-textuellen Materialien zu beachten sind, erläutert wurden, sollen im Folgenden konkrete Beispiele unterschiedlicher Präsentationen digitaler Bildbestände besprochen werden. Das Canadian Heritage Information Network bietet als Grundlage für die Beurteilung von Bilddatenbanken eine 37 Seiten umfassende Word-Datei zu Abklärung aller möglichen Anforderungen (bspw. Inventarisierung, Ausleihe, verschiedene Suchoptionen, Urheberrecht, Langzeitarchivierung, Kostenrechnung für Druckaufträge usw.) an eine Bilddatenbank an . Diese Liste ist ursprünglich für den Museumsbereich zusammengestellt worden und darum für den Bibliotheksbereich nur teilweise übertragbar. Die folgenden Beispiele wurden daher nach eigenen Kriterien miteinander verglichen, um zu analysieren, welche Angebote bzw. Bestandteile dieser Angebote als Anregung für die Präsentation nicht-textueller Materialien wie den Gouachen der Königlichen Gartenbibliothek dienen könnten. Hierbei wurden die Punkte Erschließung, Sicherung, Digitalisierung, Metadaten und Präsentation betrachtet. Nach einer umfassenden Recherche wurden von der Fülle der unterschiedlichen Internetpräsentationen insgesamt 14 verschiedene Angebote ausgewählt. Zur Verbesserung der Übersichtlichkeit wurden die Datenbanken thematisch zusammengefasst (allgemeine Portale, pomologische und botanische Datenbanken, sowie andere Themenbereiche). Auf den folgenden Seiten werden einige der untersuchten Datenbanken kurz vorgestellt.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  20. Park, J.-r.; Li, G.; Burger, A.: Opening and closing rituals of the virtual reference service of the Internet Public Library (2010) 0.00
    0.0017247554 = product of:
      0.013798043 = sum of:
        0.0063908724 = product of:
          0.012781745 = sum of:
            0.012781745 = weight(_text_:online in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012781745 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007407171 = weight(_text_:information in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007407171 = score(doc=4153,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the communicative rituals of opening and closing manifested in e-mail-based Internet Public Library's (IPL's) online reference interaction. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 400 transcripts comprising user queries and responses by IPL librarians are examined. The opening and closing elements are identified to examine the way in which IPL librarians and users construct social space; that is, communicate their interpersonal and affective stances during the course of seeking and offering information. Findings - The results of data analysis show regular patterns of verbal and structural politeness indicators of opening and closing e-mail discourse. Linguistic elements such as greetings and acknowledgement are included in all the sampled transcripts; i.e. a 100 percent occurrence. Closing rituals have a 95 percent occurrence of linguistic features such as acknowledgement and invitation for follow-up. In contrast, there is a low occurrence of personalized openings through greeting by user name (26 percent). This lack of personalization also occurs in closings: personalized farewell through use of librarian name appears in only 8 percent of closings. Research limitations/implications - The employment of the various politeness tactics in opening and closing reflects the librarian's attention and concern to user's information needs, interests and wants. Such communicative competence narrows social distance and brings forth close socio-interpersonal space for interaction; this may, in turn, improve the overall quality of reference service. Research findings also indicate that more use of personal names may decrease the social distance between the librarian and user, resulting in increased solidarity and proximity. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into linguistic politeness and the functions of address forms such as personal names with a view toward developing effective opening and closing rituals that contribute to the enhancement of virtual reference services.
    Theme
    Information Gateway

Languages

  • d 37
  • e 16

Types

  • a 47
  • el 10
  • s 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications