Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.06
    0.062367752 = product of:
      0.124735504 = sum of:
        0.124735504 = sum of:
          0.065297656 = weight(_text_:work in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065297656 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
          0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059437852 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The key political and strategic issues which needs to be addressed for the future development of the Australian subject gateways are: continued quality of content creation, integration of access to print and electronic resources, archiving and persistent identification, sustainability of services and service integration. These issues will be more effectively tackled internationally, and the Australian subject gateways are keen to work with international collaborators to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  2. Mitchell, S.; Mason, J.; Pender, L.: Enabling technologies and service designs for collaborative Internet collection building (2004) 0.05
    0.054571785 = product of:
      0.10914357 = sum of:
        0.10914357 = sum of:
          0.05713545 = weight(_text_:work in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713545 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
          0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05200812 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The following describes a number of technologies and exemplary service designs that foster better Internet finding tools in libraries and more cooperative and efficient effort in Internet resource collection building. Our library and partner institutions have been involved in this work for over a decade. The open source software and projects discussed represent appropriate technologies and sustainable strategies that will help Internet portals, digital libraries, virtual libraries and library catalogs-with-portal-like-capabilities (IPDVLCs) to scale better and to anticipate and meet the needs of scholarly and educational users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.3, S.295-306
  3. Neuroth, H.; Pianos, T.: VASCODA: a German scientific portal for cross-searching distributed digital resource collections (2003) 0.05
    0.046775818 = product of:
      0.093551636 = sum of:
        0.093551636 = sum of:
          0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048973244 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
          0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04457839 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The German information science community - with the support of the two main funding agencies in Germany - will develop a scientific portal, vascoda, for cross-searching distributed metadata collections. In platitudinous words, one of the services of vascoda is going to be a ldquoGooglerdquo-like search for the academic community, an easy to use, yet sophisticated search-engine to supply information on high-quality resources from different media and technical environments. Reaching this objective requires considerable standardisation activity amongst the main players to harmonise the already existing services (e.g. regarding metadata, protocols, etc.). The co-operation amongst the participants including both of the funding agencies is creating a unique team-work situation in Germany thus strengthening the information science community.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  4. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03
    0.031183876 = product of:
      0.062367752 = sum of:
        0.062367752 = sum of:
          0.032648828 = weight(_text_:work in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032648828 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.029718926 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029718926 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  5. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.03
    0.026268067 = product of:
      0.052536134 = sum of:
        0.052536134 = product of:
          0.10507227 = sum of:
            0.10507227 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10507227 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  6. Subject gateways (2000) 0.03
    0.02600406 = product of:
      0.05200812 = sum of:
        0.05200812 = product of:
          0.10401624 = sum of:
            0.10401624 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10401624 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  7. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.02
    0.022289194 = product of:
      0.04457839 = sum of:
        0.04457839 = product of:
          0.08915678 = sum of:
            0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08915678 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  8. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.022289194 = product of:
      0.04457839 = sum of:
        0.04457839 = product of:
          0.08915678 = sum of:
            0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08915678 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  9. Crane, G.: ¬The Perseus Project and beyond : how building a digital library challenges the humanities and technology (1998) 0.02
    0.021206036 = product of:
      0.042412072 = sum of:
        0.042412072 = product of:
          0.084824145 = sum of:
            0.084824145 = weight(_text_:work in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084824145 = score(doc=1251,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.4214336 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For more than ten years, the Perseus Project has been developing a digital library in the humanities. Initial work concentrated exclusively on ancient Greek culture, using this domain as a case study for a compact, densely hypertextual library on a single, but interdisciplinary, subject. Since it has achieved its initial goals with the Greek materials, however, Perseus is using the existing library to study the new possibilities (and limitations) of the electronic medium and to serve as the foundation for work in new cultural domains: Perseus has begun coverage of Roman and now Renaissance materials, with plans for expansion into other areas of the humanities as well. Our goal is not only to help traditional scholars conduct their research more effectively but, more importantly, to help humanists use the technology to redefine the relationship between their work and the broader intellectual community.
  10. CORC : new tools and possibilities for cooperative electronic resource description (2001) 0.02
    0.020405518 = product of:
      0.040811036 = sum of:
        0.040811036 = product of:
          0.08162207 = sum of:
            0.08162207 = weight(_text_:work in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08162207 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the nuts-and-bolts practical matters of making this cataloging system work in the Internet environment, where information objects are electronic, transient, and numerous.
  11. Dawson, A.: Creating metadata that work for digital libraries and Google (2004) 0.02
    0.020200431 = product of:
      0.040400863 = sum of:
        0.040400863 = product of:
          0.080801725 = sum of:
            0.080801725 = weight(_text_:work in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080801725 = score(doc=4762,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For many years metadata has been recognised as a significant component of the digital information environment. Substantial work has gone into creating complex metadata schemes for describing digital content. Yet increasingly Web search engines, and Google in particular, are the primary means of discovering and selecting digital resources, although they make little use of metadata. This article considers how digital libraries can gain more value from their metadata by adapting it for Google users, while still following well-established principles and standards for cataloguing and digital preservation.
  12. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02
    0.01857433 = product of:
      0.03714866 = sum of:
        0.03714866 = product of:
          0.07429732 = sum of:
            0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07429732 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  13. Shechtman, N.; Chung, M.; Roschelle, J.: Supporting member collaboration in the Math Tools digital library : a formative user study (2004) 0.02
    0.017314656 = product of:
      0.03462931 = sum of:
        0.03462931 = product of:
          0.06925862 = sum of:
            0.06925862 = weight(_text_:work in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06925862 = score(doc=1163,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we discuss a user study done at the formative stage of development of a Math Tools developers' community. The Math Tools digital library, which aims to collect software tools to support K-12 and university mathematics instruction, has two synergistic purposes. One is to support federated search and the other is to create a community of practice in which developers and users can work together. While much research has explored the technical problem of federated search, there has been little investigation into how to grow a creative, working community around a digital library. To this end, we surveyed and interviewed members of the Math Tools community in order to elicit concerns and priorities. These data led to rich descriptions of the teachers, developers, and researchers who comprise this community. Insights from these descriptions were then used to inform the creation of a set of metaphors and design principles that the Math Tools team could use in their continuing design work.
  14. Blandford, A.; Adams, A.; Attfield, S.; Buchanan, G.; Gow, J.; Makri, S.; Rimmer, J.; Warwick, C.: ¬The PRET A Rapporter framework : evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work (2008) 0.02
    0.017314656 = product of:
      0.03462931 = sum of:
        0.03462931 = product of:
          0.06925862 = sum of:
            0.06925862 = weight(_text_:work in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06925862 = score(doc=2021,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The strongest tradition of IR systems evaluation has focused on system effectiveness; more recently, there has been a growing interest in evaluation of Interactive IR systems, balancing system and user-oriented evaluation criteria. In this paper we shift the focus to considering how IR systems, and particularly digital libraries, can be evaluated to assess (and improve) their fit with users' broader work activities. Taking this focus, we answer a different set of evaluation questions that reveal more about the design of interfaces, user-system interactions and how systems may be deployed in the information working context. The planning and conduct of such evaluation studies share some features with the established methods for conducting IR evaluation studies, but come with a shift in emphasis; for example, a greater range of ethical considerations may be pertinent. We present the PRET A Rapporter framework for structuring user-centred evaluation studies and illustrate its application to three evaluation studies of digital library systems.
  15. Jacob, E.K.; Albrechtsen, H.; George, N.: Empirical analysis and evaluation of a metadata scheme for representing pedagogical resources in a digital library for educators (2006) 0.02
    0.017314656 = product of:
      0.03462931 = sum of:
        0.03462931 = product of:
          0.06925862 = sum of:
            0.06925862 = weight(_text_:work in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06925862 = score(doc=2518,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper introduces the Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT) digital library and describes the pedagogical nature of the resources that make up this library for educators. Because resources in this library are stored in the form of metadata records, the utility of the metadata scheme, its elements and its relationships is central to the ability of the library to address the pedagogical needs of instructors in the work domain of the classroom. The analytic framework provided by cognitive work analysis (CWA) is proposed as an innovative approach for evaluating the effectiveness of the JiTT metadata scheme. CWA is also discussed as an approach to assessing the ability of this extensive networked library to create a common digital environment that fosters cooperation and collaboration among instructors.
  16. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.014859463 = product of:
      0.029718926 = sum of:
        0.029718926 = product of:
          0.059437852 = sum of:
            0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059437852 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  17. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.014859463 = product of:
      0.029718926 = sum of:
        0.029718926 = product of:
          0.059437852 = sum of:
            0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059437852 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  18. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.01
    0.014859463 = product of:
      0.029718926 = sum of:
        0.029718926 = product of:
          0.059437852 = sum of:
            0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059437852 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  19. Collier, M.: ¬The business aims of eight national libraries in digital library co-operation : a study carried out for the business plan of The European Library (TEL) project (2005) 0.01
    0.01442888 = product of:
      0.02885776 = sum of:
        0.02885776 = product of:
          0.05771552 = sum of:
            0.05771552 = weight(_text_:work in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05771552 = score(doc=4951,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.28674924 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To describe the process and results of the business-planning workpackage of The European Library (TEL) project, in which eight national libraries collaborated on a joint approach to access to their digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology was in three parts: first, a literature review and the mapping of the partners' existing and planned digital products and services, then a structured interview or survey to determine the partners' business requirements from TEL, then a harmonization process, and finally the results were then combined with normal business planning elements to produce a mission and final business plan. Findings - Business planning for digital libraries has hitherto not been widely reported. The methodology proved to be an effective method of achieving mutual agreement among partners with widely different aims and characteristics. Eleven harmonized service aspirations were agreed and five categories of business aims. Research limitations/implications - Focused on the business aims of national libraries, but the methodology can be relevant to other collaborative projects. Together with the few existing other reports, this can form the basis for a new field of work. Practical implications - The work described led directly to the creation of an operational service, which will be open to all European national libraries. Originality/value - As far as is known, the first reporting of a collaborative international planning process for a digital library, and maybe the first multi-partner business plan between national libraries.
  20. Arms, W.Y.; Blanchi, C.; Overly, E.A.: ¬An architecture for information in digital libraries (1997) 0.01
    0.014283863 = product of:
      0.028567726 = sum of:
        0.028567726 = product of:
          0.05713545 = sum of:
            0.05713545 = weight(_text_:work in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05713545 = score(doc=1260,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Flexible organization of information is one of the key design challenges in any digital library. For the past year, we have been working with members of the National Digital Library Project (NDLP) at the Library of Congress to build an experimental system to organize and store library collections. This is a report on the work. In particular, we describe how a few technical building blocks are used to organize the material in collections, such as the NDLP's, and how these methods fit into a general distributed computing framework. The technical building blocks are part of a framework that evolved as part of the Computer Science Technical Reports Project (CSTR). This framework is described in the paper, "A Framework for Distributed Digital Object Services", by Robert Kahn and Robert Wilensky (1995). The main building blocks are: "digital objects", which are used to manage digital material in a networked environment; "handles", which identify digital objects and other network resources; and "repositories", in which digital objects are stored. These concepts are amplified in "Key Concepts in the Architecture of the Digital Library", by William Y. Arms (1995). In summer 1995, after earlier experimental development, work began on the implementation of a full digital library system based on this framework. In addition to Kahn/Wilensky and Arms, several working papers further elaborate on the design concepts. A paper by Carl Lagoze and David Ely, "Implementation Issues in an Open Architectural Framework for Digital Object Services", delves into some of the repository concepts. The initial repository implementation was based on a paper by Carl Lagoze, Robert McGrath, Ed Overly and Nancy Yeager, "A Design for Inter-Operable Secure Object Stores (ISOS)". Work on the handle system, which began in 1992, is described in a series of papers that can be found on the Handle Home Page. The National Digital Library Program (NDLP) at the Library of Congress is a large scale project to convert historic collections to digital form and make them widely available over the Internet. The program is described in two articles by Caroline R. Arms, "Historical Collections for the National Digital Library". The NDLP itself draws on experience gained through the earlier American Memory Program. Based on this work, we have built a pilot system that demonstrates how digital objects can be used to organize complex materials, such as those found in the NDLP. The pilot was demonstrated to members of the library in July 1996. The pilot system includes the handle system for identifying digital objects, a pilot repository to store them, and two user interfaces: one designed for librarians to manage digital objects in the repository, the other for library patrons to access the materials stored in the repository. Materials from the NDLP's Coolidge Consumerism compilation have been deposited into the pilot repository. They include a variety of photographs and texts, converted to digital form. The pilot demonstrates the use of handles for identifying such material, the use of meta-objects for managing sets of digital objects, and the choice of metadata. We are now implementing an enhanced prototype system for completion in early 1997.

Languages

  • e 49
  • d 19

Types

  • a 60
  • el 15
  • s 2
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…