Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996) 0.08 
    0.08264104 = product of:
  0.2066026 = sum of:
    0.123768464 = weight(_text_:needs in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.123768464 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26170355 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2805085 = idf(docFreq=1662, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061138425 = queryNorm
        0.47293383 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2805085 = idf(docFreq=1662, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
    0.08283413 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08283413 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21409635 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061138425 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses information in the context of information resources management arguing that it is an essential resource for every organization but one that needs to be managed better. Examines information as a resource, as an asset, as a commodity, as a rubbish
    Source
    Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
  2. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.07 
    0.06567842 = product of:
  0.16419604 = sum of:
    0.11449557 = weight(_text_:objects in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11449557 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32495508 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061138425 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
    0.049700476 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049700476 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21409635 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061138425 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  3. Due, R.T.: ¬The value of information (1996) 0.02 
    0.019802956 = product of:
  0.099014774 = sum of:
    0.099014774 = weight(_text_:needs in 7898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099014774 = score(doc=7898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26170355 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2805085 = idf(docFreq=1662, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061138425 = queryNorm
        0.37834707 = fieldWeight in 7898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2805085 = idf(docFreq=1662, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7898)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Data lacks value by itself, it needs to be processed into information. There are 2 types of organizational information: operational and management information systems. Details how the value of these types of information are measured. Explains the normative or information-economics approach to valuing information which attempts to quantify the incremental value of the decisions made with new information. Details the different types of decision assistance systems that can be provided. Describes the weaknesses of the realistic and the subjective value of information approach

Authors