Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.03
    0.025030928 = product of:
      0.050061855 = sum of:
        0.050061855 = sum of:
          0.021780973 = weight(_text_:systems in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021780973 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.028280882 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028280882 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052184064 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
  2. Eickhoff, A.: Wissensmanagement : für die Praxis nutzbar gemacht! (2001) 0.02
    0.021210661 = product of:
      0.042421322 = sum of:
        0.042421322 = product of:
          0.084842645 = sum of:
            0.084842645 = weight(_text_:22 in 6878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084842645 = score(doc=6878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2001, Nr.70, S.21-22 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 54(2001) H.2/3]
  3. Fischer, G.; Ostwald, J.: Knowledge management : problems, promises, realities, and challenges (2001) 0.02
    0.019058352 = product of:
      0.038116705 = sum of:
        0.038116705 = product of:
          0.07623341 = sum of:
            0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 2503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07623341 = score(doc=2503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 2503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IEEE intelligent systems. 16(2001) no.1, S.60-72
  4. Srinivasan, U.; Ngu, A.H.H.; Gedeon, T.: Managing heterogeneous information systems through discovery and retrieval of generic concepts (2000) 0.02
    0.0182639 = product of:
      0.0365278 = sum of:
        0.0365278 = product of:
          0.0730556 = sum of:
            0.0730556 = weight(_text_:systems in 4805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0730556 = score(doc=4805,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 4805, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4805)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Autonomy of operations combined with decentralized management of data gives rise to a number of hetegrogeneous databases or information systems within an enterprise. These systems are often incompatible in structure as well as content and, hence, difficult to integrate. Depsite heterogeneity, the unity of overall purpose within a common application domain, nevertheless, provides a degree of semantic similarity that manifests itself in the form of similar data structures and common usage patterns of existing information systems. This article introduces a conceptual integration approach that exploits the similarity in metalevel information in existing systems and performs 'metadata mining' on database objects to discover a set of concepts that serve as a domain abstraction and provide a conceptual layer is further uitlized by an information reengineering framework that customizes and packages information to reflect the unique needs of differnt user groups within the application domain. The architecture of the information reengineering framework is based on an object-oriented model that represents the discovered concepts as customized application objects for each distinct user group
  5. Gürth, W.: E-Business : Eine Welt für KMU? (2001) 0.01
    0.014140441 = product of:
      0.028280882 = sum of:
        0.028280882 = product of:
          0.056561764 = sum of:
            0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 6558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056561764 = score(doc=6558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.10.2001 18:19:22
  6. Herget, J.: Informationsmanagement (2004) 0.01
    0.014140441 = product of:
      0.028280882 = sum of:
        0.028280882 = product of:
          0.056561764 = sum of:
            0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056561764 = score(doc=2916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2916)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21.11.2004 12:33:22
  7. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.01
    0.013476291 = product of:
      0.026952581 = sum of:
        0.026952581 = product of:
          0.053905163 = sum of:
            0.053905163 = weight(_text_:systems in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053905163 = score(doc=1499,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  8. Kaps, G.; Nohr, H.: Erfolgsmessung im Wissensmanagement mit Balanced Scorecards : Teil 1 (2001) 0.01
    0.012372886 = product of:
      0.024745772 = sum of:
        0.024745772 = product of:
          0.049491543 = sum of:
            0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049491543 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2001 13:20:44
  9. Molner, J.: Informationsmanagement : Erstmals Branchenvergleich mit Medienunternehmen (2005) 0.01
    0.012372886 = product of:
      0.024745772 = sum of:
        0.024745772 = product of:
          0.049491543 = sum of:
            0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049491543 = score(doc=3418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 12:12:23
  10. Blumauer, A.; Fundneider, T.: Semantische Technologien in integrierten Wissensmanagement-Systemen (2006) 0.01
    0.010890487 = product of:
      0.021780973 = sum of:
        0.021780973 = product of:
          0.043561947 = sum of:
            0.043561947 = weight(_text_:systems in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043561947 = score(doc=5796,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Adaption von Techniken und Verfahren des Semantic Web für Inhouse-Lösungen adressiert neben dem Themenkreis Enterprise Information Integration (Eli) zumeist neue Handlungsoptionen für das Wissensmanagement, die über den derzeit am öftesten diskutierten Anwendungsfall "intelligente Suchmaschine" beträchtlich hinausgehen. In diesem Beitrag werden die vielfältigen Einsatzmöglichkeiten semantischer Technologien im betrieblichen Kontext systematisch anhand der Architektur eines integrierten Wissensmanagement-Systems diskutiert und hinsichtlich ihrer Einsatzszenarien untersucht.
  11. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01
    0.010890487 = product of:
      0.021780973 = sum of:
        0.021780973 = product of:
          0.043561947 = sum of:
            0.043561947 = weight(_text_:systems in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043561947 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  12. Rüegger, R.: ¬Die Qualität der virtuellen Information als Wettbewerbsvorteil : Information im Internet ist Sprache - noch (2000) 0.01
    0.010605331 = product of:
      0.021210661 = sum of:
        0.021210661 = product of:
          0.042421322 = sum of:
            0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042421322 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.17-22
  13. Graumann, S.; Bredemeier, W.; Köhne, B.: Aktualisierte Grundlagenstudie zur Informationswirtschaft : Im Auftrag des Bundeswirtschaftsministeriums (2002) 0.01
    0.010605331 = product of:
      0.021210661 = sum of:
        0.021210661 = product of:
          0.042421322 = sum of:
            0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042421322 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28.11.2004 13:03:22
  14. Eich, U.: Informationsmanagement in Wissenschaft und Technik : Symposium in der ETH-Bibliothek am 27. und 28. Januar 2005 (2005) 0.01
    0.010605331 = product of:
      0.021210661 = sum of:
        0.021210661 = product of:
          0.042421322 = sum of:
            0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042421322 = score(doc=3419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 12:16:05
  15. Scheid, E.M.; Gropp, I.: Taxonomie : von der Last zur Chance (2001) 0.01
    0.009529176 = product of:
      0.019058352 = sum of:
        0.019058352 = product of:
          0.038116705 = sum of:
            0.038116705 = weight(_text_:systems in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038116705 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Erfahrungen bei der Einführung von Wissensmanagement zeigen, dass eine ganzheitliche Herangehensweise erforderlich ist. Ausgehend von der Darstellung eines Vorgehensmodells zum Wissensmanagement betrachtet der Artikel speziell das Thema Klassifikation von Informations- und Wissensbeständen. Die Verfügbarkeit einer sinnvollen Klassifikation hat entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Akzeptanz und optimale Nutzung des technisch realisierten Wissensmanagements. Sie bietet den Vorteil, dass die Nutzer des Systems eine gemeinsame Sprache bzw. Semantik zur Beschreibung der Wissensinhalte verwenden und somit gleiche Inhalte auch gleich bezeichnen
  16. Scott, J.E.: Organizational knowledge and the Intranet (2002) 0.01
    0.0094314385 = product of:
      0.018862877 = sum of:
        0.018862877 = product of:
          0.037725754 = sum of:
            0.037725754 = weight(_text_:systems in 4246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037725754 = score(doc=4246,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2352409 = fieldWeight in 4246, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Intranet has been hailed as the solution to organizational technology issues as far reaching as faster information systems development, access to legacy system data, integration of incompatible systems, and progress toward the "paperless office." Moreover, intranets enable work-flow management and project management and are a platform for process redesign. Yet possibly the most far-reaching impact of the Intranet is an organizational knowledge. Intranets are providing institutions and organizations with opportunities to create knowledge. A large proportion of the pioneers are high-technology companies making use of intranets for knowledge-intensive new product development. Intranets enable community expertise to develop, as engineers brainstorm and give each other feedback in discussion groups and share product specifications and product test result queries. The scope of interest in intranets is evidenced by diverse articles and applications in the medical, legal, engineering, training, travel, technical, computer-related, and manufacturing industries. Although some definitions restrict intranets to internal information an internal webs accessed exclusively by internal users, in this article, we adopt a broader definition that includes customers and suppliers in the extended enterprise [also called an "Extranet"] and industrywide applications. Thus, an intranet is a "powerful tool for institution-wide communications, collaborative projects, and the establishment of a sense of community an a manageable scale". Despite the fact that many organizations have adopted the Intranet with great enthusiasm and there has been an avalanche of Web and journalistic articles an the Intranet since the end of 1995, theoretical research has been lacking. Evidence of the business value of the Intranet has been convincing but largely anecdotal. In addition, negative reports have surfaced an hidden costs, performance limitations, and organizational resistance. Such issues have been researched with political theories that explain how some constituents gain and others lose when there is organizational change associated with information technology (IT) implementation. Organizational learning theories also explain such contradictions by examining what affects the creation, integration, and management of knowledge and the facilitation of organizational memory. For example, the theory of organizational knowledge creation posits that autonomy, intention, redundancy, fluctuation and creative chaos, and requisite variety are conditions that induce the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge in a spiral from individual to group, to organization levels. The findings from this analysis of reported implementations of intranets generate a theoretically based model relating organizational kowledge to the Intranet phenomenon. We extend the inductive concepts by analyzing example of enabling conditions and organizational knowledge creation modes an intranets, using Nonaka's theory of organizational knowledge creation as a guide. Our contribution is to develop a theoretical understanding of the Intranet phenomenon, with an initial framework to guide further conceptual and empirical research an the impacts and business value of the Intranet and to present implications for information systems (IS) developers, IS departments, management, and researchers.
  17. Gerbé, O.; Mineau, G.W.; Keller, R.K.: Conceptual graphs, metamodelling, and notation of concepts : fundamental issues (2000) 0.01
    0.008167865 = product of:
      0.01633573 = sum of:
        0.01633573 = product of:
          0.03267146 = sum of:
            0.03267146 = weight(_text_:systems in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03267146 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge management, in particular corporate knowledge management, is a challenge companies and researchers have to meet. The conceptual graph formalism is a good candidate for the representation of corporate knowledge, and for the development of knowledge management systems. But many of the issues concerning the use of conceptual graphs as a metalanguage have not been worked out in detail. By introducing a function that maps higher level to lower level, this paper clarifies the metalevel semantics, notation and manipulation of concepts in the conceptual graph formalism. In addition, this function allows metamodeling activities to take place using the CG notation
  18. Van der Walt, P.W.; Toit, A.S.A. du: Developing a scaleable information architecture for an enterprise-wide consolidated information management platform (2007) 0.01
    0.008167865 = product of:
      0.01633573 = sum of:
        0.01633573 = product of:
          0.03267146 = sum of:
            0.03267146 = weight(_text_:systems in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03267146 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to address the concept of information architecture as a way of visualising and describing the various information assets and the interaction of these assets within an enterprise. Design/methodology/approach - The establishment of the information architecture is illustrated through a case study within a large conglomeration of companies requiring scaleable information architecture in order to address its information requirements. Executives who are considered influential in the overall management of the group were interviewed. Findings - The requirements expressed during the interview process, as well as observations made during meetings and general discussions with the various role-players within the enterprise, gave the project team the necessary confirmation of the information requirements of the enterprise. Research limitations/implications - As there is no direct integration between the underlying systems and networks, this had to be taken into consideration for the design of the information architecture. Originality/value - The information architecture established in the enterprise forms the basis of support in delivering future information requirements for the enterprise.
  19. Michelson, M.: Wirtschaftsinformation (2004) 0.01
    0.0070702205 = product of:
      0.014140441 = sum of:
        0.014140441 = product of:
          0.028280882 = sum of:
            0.028280882 = weight(_text_:22 in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028280882 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:22:09
  20. Bredemeier, W.; Müller, P.: Informationswirtschaft (2004) 0.01
    0.006186443 = product of:
      0.012372886 = sum of:
        0.012372886 = product of:
          0.024745772 = sum of:
            0.024745772 = weight(_text_:22 in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024745772 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052184064 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:22:00