Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Gerbé, O.; Mineau, G.W.; Keller, R.K.: Conceptual graphs, metamodelling, and notation of concepts : fundamental issues (2000) 0.01
    0.009784763 = product of:
      0.08806286 = sum of:
        0.08806286 = weight(_text_:germany in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08806286 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22275731 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.39533097 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  2. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.01
    0.0059171617 = product of:
      0.026627228 = sum of:
        0.01650555 = weight(_text_:data in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01650555 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
        0.010121676 = product of:
          0.020243352 = sum of:
            0.020243352 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020243352 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
  3. Choo, C.W.: Perspectives on managing knowledge in organizations (2003) 0.00
    0.0049857134 = product of:
      0.04487142 = sum of:
        0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04487142 = score(doc=5519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2003) nos.1/2, S.205-219
  4. Srinivasan, U.; Ngu, A.H.H.; Gedeon, T.: Managing heterogeneous information systems through discovery and retrieval of generic concepts (2000) 0.00
    0.0038903956 = product of:
      0.03501356 = sum of:
        0.03501356 = weight(_text_:data in 4805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501356 = score(doc=4805,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 4805, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4805)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Autonomy of operations combined with decentralized management of data gives rise to a number of hetegrogeneous databases or information systems within an enterprise. These systems are often incompatible in structure as well as content and, hence, difficult to integrate. Depsite heterogeneity, the unity of overall purpose within a common application domain, nevertheless, provides a degree of semantic similarity that manifests itself in the form of similar data structures and common usage patterns of existing information systems. This article introduces a conceptual integration approach that exploits the similarity in metalevel information in existing systems and performs 'metadata mining' on database objects to discover a set of concepts that serve as a domain abstraction and provide a conceptual layer is further uitlized by an information reengineering framework that customizes and packages information to reflect the unique needs of differnt user groups within the application domain. The architecture of the information reengineering framework is based on an object-oriented model that represents the discovered concepts as customized application objects for each distinct user group
  5. Eickhoff, A.: Wissensmanagement : für die Praxis nutzbar gemacht! (2001) 0.00
    0.003373892 = product of:
      0.030365027 = sum of:
        0.030365027 = product of:
          0.060730055 = sum of:
            0.060730055 = weight(_text_:22 in 6878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060730055 = score(doc=6878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2001, Nr.70, S.21-22 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 54(2001) H.2/3]
  6. Saulles, M. de: Information literacy amongst UK SMEs : an information policy gap (2007) 0.00
    0.0032419965 = product of:
      0.029177967 = sum of:
        0.029177967 = weight(_text_:data in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029177967 = score(doc=808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore information literacy amongst small- and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) in the UK and the USA and argue that information policy in the UK has not given sufficient attention to helping these companies navigate the ever-increasing volumes of information accessible over the internet. Design/methodology/approach - A combination of primary and secondary data have been used. The primary data consists of a survey of UK SMEs, which explored how these companies use the internet as a research tool. The results of the survey are compared to similar surveys carried out in the USA. Several significant UK policy documents are examined to find out how government policy in this area has addressed the issue of information literacy amongst SMEs. Findings - It is shown that UK SMEs wasted over £3.7 billion in 2005 in terms of time wasted through inefficient use of the internet as a research tool. Practical implications - It is argued that while government policies in this area have put resources into encouraging SMEs to adopt broadband and engage in e-commerce, they have not sufficiently addressed the issue of information literacy. Originality/value - Little research has been carried out into how SMEs use the internet as a research tool and this is the first time that a financial cost figure has been applied to inefficient searching by these organisations.
  7. Gürth, W.: E-Business : Eine Welt für KMU? (2001) 0.00
    0.0022492614 = product of:
      0.020243352 = sum of:
        0.020243352 = product of:
          0.040486705 = sum of:
            0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 6558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040486705 = score(doc=6558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    1.10.2001 18:19:22
  8. Herget, J.: Informationsmanagement (2004) 0.00
    0.0022492614 = product of:
      0.020243352 = sum of:
        0.020243352 = product of:
          0.040486705 = sum of:
            0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040486705 = score(doc=2916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2916)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    21.11.2004 12:33:22
  9. Kaps, G.; Nohr, H.: Erfolgsmessung im Wissensmanagement mit Balanced Scorecards : Teil 1 (2001) 0.00
    0.0019681037 = product of:
      0.017712934 = sum of:
        0.017712934 = product of:
          0.035425868 = sum of:
            0.035425868 = weight(_text_:22 in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035425868 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2001 13:20:44
  10. Molner, J.: Informationsmanagement : Erstmals Branchenvergleich mit Medienunternehmen (2005) 0.00
    0.0019681037 = product of:
      0.017712934 = sum of:
        0.017712934 = product of:
          0.035425868 = sum of:
            0.035425868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035425868 = score(doc=3418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 12:12:23
  11. Scott, J.E.: Organizational knowledge and the Intranet (2002) 0.00
    0.00183395 = product of:
      0.01650555 = sum of:
        0.01650555 = weight(_text_:data in 4246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01650555 = score(doc=4246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 4246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4246)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Intranet has been hailed as the solution to organizational technology issues as far reaching as faster information systems development, access to legacy system data, integration of incompatible systems, and progress toward the "paperless office." Moreover, intranets enable work-flow management and project management and are a platform for process redesign. Yet possibly the most far-reaching impact of the Intranet is an organizational knowledge. Intranets are providing institutions and organizations with opportunities to create knowledge. A large proportion of the pioneers are high-technology companies making use of intranets for knowledge-intensive new product development. Intranets enable community expertise to develop, as engineers brainstorm and give each other feedback in discussion groups and share product specifications and product test result queries. The scope of interest in intranets is evidenced by diverse articles and applications in the medical, legal, engineering, training, travel, technical, computer-related, and manufacturing industries. Although some definitions restrict intranets to internal information an internal webs accessed exclusively by internal users, in this article, we adopt a broader definition that includes customers and suppliers in the extended enterprise [also called an "Extranet"] and industrywide applications. Thus, an intranet is a "powerful tool for institution-wide communications, collaborative projects, and the establishment of a sense of community an a manageable scale". Despite the fact that many organizations have adopted the Intranet with great enthusiasm and there has been an avalanche of Web and journalistic articles an the Intranet since the end of 1995, theoretical research has been lacking. Evidence of the business value of the Intranet has been convincing but largely anecdotal. In addition, negative reports have surfaced an hidden costs, performance limitations, and organizational resistance. Such issues have been researched with political theories that explain how some constituents gain and others lose when there is organizational change associated with information technology (IT) implementation. Organizational learning theories also explain such contradictions by examining what affects the creation, integration, and management of knowledge and the facilitation of organizational memory. For example, the theory of organizational knowledge creation posits that autonomy, intention, redundancy, fluctuation and creative chaos, and requisite variety are conditions that induce the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge in a spiral from individual to group, to organization levels. The findings from this analysis of reported implementations of intranets generate a theoretically based model relating organizational kowledge to the Intranet phenomenon. We extend the inductive concepts by analyzing example of enabling conditions and organizational knowledge creation modes an intranets, using Nonaka's theory of organizational knowledge creation as a guide. Our contribution is to develop a theoretical understanding of the Intranet phenomenon, with an initial framework to guide further conceptual and empirical research an the impacts and business value of the Intranet and to present implications for information systems (IS) developers, IS departments, management, and researchers.
  12. Rüegger, R.: ¬Die Qualität der virtuellen Information als Wettbewerbsvorteil : Information im Internet ist Sprache - noch (2000) 0.00
    0.001686946 = product of:
      0.015182514 = sum of:
        0.015182514 = product of:
          0.030365027 = sum of:
            0.030365027 = weight(_text_:22 in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030365027 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Pages
    S.17-22
  13. Graumann, S.; Bredemeier, W.; Köhne, B.: Aktualisierte Grundlagenstudie zur Informationswirtschaft : Im Auftrag des Bundeswirtschaftsministeriums (2002) 0.00
    0.001686946 = product of:
      0.015182514 = sum of:
        0.015182514 = product of:
          0.030365027 = sum of:
            0.030365027 = weight(_text_:22 in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030365027 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    28.11.2004 13:03:22
  14. Eich, U.: Informationsmanagement in Wissenschaft und Technik : Symposium in der ETH-Bibliothek am 27. und 28. Januar 2005 (2005) 0.00
    0.001686946 = product of:
      0.015182514 = sum of:
        0.015182514 = product of:
          0.030365027 = sum of:
            0.030365027 = weight(_text_:22 in 3419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030365027 = score(doc=3419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 12:16:05
  15. Michelson, M.: Wirtschaftsinformation (2004) 0.00
    0.0011246307 = product of:
      0.010121676 = sum of:
        0.010121676 = product of:
          0.020243352 = sum of:
            0.020243352 = weight(_text_:22 in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020243352 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:22:09
  16. Bredemeier, W.; Müller, P.: Informationswirtschaft (2004) 0.00
    9.840518E-4 = product of:
      0.008856467 = sum of:
        0.008856467 = product of:
          0.017712934 = sum of:
            0.017712934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017712934 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:22:00