Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Yuan, Y.C.; Rickard, L.N.; Xia, L.; Scherer, C.: ¬The interplay between interpersonal and electronic resources in knowledge seeking among co-located and distributed employees (2011) 0.01 
    0.01293251 = product of:
  0.05173004 = sum of:
    0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05173004 = score(doc=4354,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In the information age, a common problem for employees is not lack of resources but rather how to sift through multiple resources, both electronic and interpersonal, to retrieve and locate true expert knowledge. The main objective of this study is hence to explore employees' simultaneous usage of both resources and to identify situations where employees showed a clear preference of interpersonal resources over electronic ones, and where employees found these two resources (a) (ir)replaceable and (b) complementary. Both qualitative interview data and quantitative social-network data were collected from a university-affiliated community educational office. Data analysis showed that (a) social relationships were crucial for seeking and gaining actual access to needed knowledge; (b) employees were task-driven in knowledge seeking and obtained different types of knowledge depending on availability; and (c) the choice between interpersonal and electronic resources was determined by the characteristics of the knowledge sought as well as such contextual factors as time, cost, and location. Additional interviews from other study contexts validated most of our findings, except those that require collection of complete social-network data. The article ends with a discussion on how organizations can better leverage their investment in human and technical resources to facilitate knowledge seeking.
  2. Schmidt, N.: Forschungsdatenmanagement und Bibliotheken : Verortung in Kooperationsnetzwerken (2013) 0.01 
    0.0077595054 = product of:
  0.031038022 = sum of:
    0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 1027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031038022 = score(doc=1027,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 1027, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1027)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die Fördereinrichtung Jisc unterstützte 2011 bis 2013 27 britische Universitäten, Forschungsdatenmanagement-(RDM)-Services einzuführen oder auszubauen. Orientierung boten dabei die umfangreichen Materialien und Tools des Digital Curation Centers (DDC), die den gesamten Lebenszyklus der Daten bedienen. Auch die Struktur des vorliegenden Artikels folgt diesem Zyklus, um den State of the Art des RDM darzulegen, wie er von sechs näher zu beschreibenden Jisc-Projekten realisiert wurde. Ziel der Analyse war, anhand dieser Beispiele zu eruieren, welche Aufgaben von Bibliotheken übernommen werden. In erster Linie sind dies die Leitung des RDM-Services und die Durchführung von Trainingsmaßnahmen. Auch Repositorien und Metadaten werden meist hier gepflegt, wobei dies ebenso wie die Projektleitung und Bedarfsanalyse häufigauch an der IT angesiedelt ist. Die Policy-Entwicklung findet als weitere wichtige Bibliotheksaufgabe oft in Kooperation mit dem Forschungsservice statt, dem fast immer das Data Management Planning (DMP) obliegt.
  3. Schulze, M.: Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen und Forschungsdaten für Lehre und Forschung : Informationsinfrastrukturen für die (Natur-)Wissenschaften (2010) 0.01 
    0.006466255 = product of:
  0.02586502 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 4276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=4276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 4276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4276)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Semantic web & linked data: Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld

Authors

Languages