Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Wijnhoven. F.; Wognum, P.M.; Weg, R.L.W. van de: Knowledge ontology development (1996) 0.03
    0.028261498 = product of:
      0.08478449 = sum of:
        0.08478449 = sum of:
          0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05284806 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03193643 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge-containing documents and data about knowledge have been handled in stable environments by bureaucratic systems using very stable knowledge ontologies. These systems, though not always very effective in such environments, will become highly ineffective in environments where knowledge has to be updated and replaced frequently. Moreover, organizations in such dynamic environments also use knowledge from extemal resources extensively. This makes the development of a stable ontology for knowledge storage and retrieval particularly complicated. This paper describes eight context classes of knowledge ontology development and explores elements of a method for ontology development. These classes are based an the differences in contexts defined along three dimensions: knowledge dynamics, complexity and social dispersion. Ontology development matches these contexts and ontology needs defined by (logical and social) structure and ontology maturity. The classification framework and methodology are applied to two cases. The first case illustrates a descriptive use of our framework to characterize ontology development in an academic environment. The second case illustrates a normative use of our framework. The method proposed seemed to be empirically valid and rich and be useful for detecting options for ontology improvement.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  2. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.02
    0.022609197 = product of:
      0.06782759 = sum of:
        0.06782759 = sum of:
          0.042278446 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042278446 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.1990817 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.025549144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025549144 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
  3. Swartzberg, T.: Identifying and spreading expertise : The knowledge manager's brief: to disseminate a company's data and the know-how of its staff (1999) 0.02
    0.018065974 = product of:
      0.054197922 = sum of:
        0.054197922 = product of:
          0.108395845 = sum of:
            0.108395845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108395845 = score(doc=4179,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4179, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29.11.1999 12:18:22
    Source
    International Herald Tribune. 15. Nov. 1999, S.22
  4. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.02
    0.017032763 = product of:
      0.051098287 = sum of:
        0.051098287 = product of:
          0.102196574 = sum of:
            0.102196574 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102196574 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  5. Mentzas, G.: ¬A functional taxonomy of computer-based information systems (1994) 0.01
    0.014903667 = product of:
      0.044711 = sum of:
        0.044711 = product of:
          0.089422 = sum of:
            0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 6819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089422 = score(doc=6819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 13:34:22
  6. Dimond, G.: ¬The evaluation of information systems : a protocol for assembling information auditing packages (1996) 0.01
    0.014092816 = product of:
      0.042278446 = sum of:
        0.042278446 = product of:
          0.08455689 = sum of:
            0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 6407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08455689 = score(doc=6407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 6407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information auditing has a distinct and increasingly important role in information systems management. Reexamines the nature of autditing and identifies a variety of features which an information auditing methodology should contain and standards should demonstrably attain. Examines descriptions of auditing techniques. Notes the breadth of auditing techniques. Proposes a protocol by existing techniques can be used to assemble coherent and purposeful audits in a variety of applications
  7. Batley, S.: ¬The I in information architecture : the challenge of content management (2007) 0.01
    0.014092816 = product of:
      0.042278446 = sum of:
        0.042278446 = product of:
          0.08455689 = sum of:
            0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08455689 = score(doc=809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of content management in the context of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted is a review of definitions of information architecture and an analysis of the importance of content and its management within information architecture. Findings - Concludes that reality will not necessarily match the vision of organisations investing in information architecture. Originality/value - The paper considers practical issues around content and records management.
  8. Laukamm, T.: Elektronische Dokumentation : der Wettbewerbsfaktor der Zukunft (1993) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  9. Krebs, R.: ¬Die Rolle von Informationssystemen im Konzern : Verflechtung, Kooperation, Koordination (1993) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  10. Krebs, R.: ¬Der Informationsmarkt : Stand, Tendenzen und Prognosen für die 90er Jahre (1993) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  11. Eickhoff, A.: Wissensmanagement : für die Praxis nutzbar gemacht! (2001) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=6878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2001, Nr.70, S.21-22 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 54(2001) H.2/3]
  12. Top, J.: Objectifying domain knowledge (1996) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  13. Ang, J.; Shaw, N.; Pavri, F.: Identifying strategic management information systems planning parameters using case studies (1995) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 4169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=4169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 4169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The management information systems literature reveals a list of parameters essential for the successful implementation of an information system palnning process. Some studies stress the importance of integrating the corporate objectives of a firm into the information systems planning process. Other studies discuss the importance of performing an analysis of competitors, or determining the stage of maturity a firm has reached, or the framework used for setting information technology investment priorities. Yet others state that the choice of methodology that will be utilized to develop the information systems plan will be crucial to the success of that plan. Aims to develop a holistic model
  14. Keary, M.: Information management as an instrument of change (1996) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 6409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=6409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 6409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The best of organizations, in the process of growth and change, examine themselves continuously for fitness of purpose with regard to products, resources and services in order to discover more efficient ways of doing things. Describes the use of information technology to create new opportunities. Information management is a methodology for identifying all existing information resources within an organization whether in paper or electronic format. Understanding the value of information is a critical element in the overall process of managing information. Discusses core competencies of management development programmes. Offers examples from the public and voluntary sectors to illustrate the value and potency of information management
  15. Oliver, G.: Information culture : exploration of differing values and attitudes to information in organisations (2008) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=1846,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 1846, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1846)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to explore the concept of information culture, and to demonstrate its utility when considering information management in organisations. Design/methodology/approach - Case studies were conducted of organisations with similar functions, located in regions likely to have different cultural dimensions. Findings - The findings show that different values and attitudes to information are influencing factors of the information culture in the organisations studied. Practical implications - Knowledge and understanding of the features of information culture will assist with addressing the challenges of organisational information management in this globalised age. Originality/value - This research adds to the body of knowledge about information culture, in particular national dimensions.
  16. Beulens, A.; Zuurbier, P.: Inter-firm competence management (1996) 0.01
    0.012043982 = product of:
      0.036131945 = sum of:
        0.036131945 = product of:
          0.07226389 = sum of:
            0.07226389 = weight(_text_:22 in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07226389 = score(doc=2805,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    12. 8.2002 13:22:13
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  17. Stroetmann, K.: Information management for the '90s : a conceptual framework (1992) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.7-22
  18. Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
  19. Dickson, N.: Understanding the information economy : putting theory back into practice (1997) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=3028,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:01:46
  20. Nußbaumer, J.: Erfolg mit Wirtschaftsinformationen : Arbeitsplatz Unternehmensberatung (1998) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 4149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=4149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

Years

Languages

  • e 44
  • d 24