Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Poole, A.H.: ¬The information work of community archives : a systematic literature review (2020) 0.01
    0.00982812 = product of:
      0.03931248 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 5840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=5840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 5840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5840)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper scrutinizes the scholarship on community archives' information work. Community archives and archiving projects represent unprecedentedly democratic venues for information work centering on essential documentary concepts such as custody, collection development and appraisal, processing, arrangement and description, organization, representation and naming, collaboration, resource generation and allocation, activism and social justice, preservation, reuse, and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach Unearthed through databases searches, citation chaining, and browsing, sources examined include peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and book chapters published in the English language between 1985 and 2018. Findings The literature on community archives' information work shows considerable geographical (six continents), topical, and (inter)disciplinary variety. This paper first explores scholars' efforts to define both community and community archives. Second, it unpacks the ways in which community archives include new stakeholders and new record types and formats even as they leverage alternative archival principles and practices. Third, it discusses community archives as political venues for empowerment, activism, and social justice work. Fourth, this paper delves into the benefits and challenges of partnerships and collaborations with mainstream institutions. Fifth, it documents the obstacles community archives face: not only tensions within and among communities, but also sustainability concerns. Finally, it sets forth six directions for future research. Originality/value This paper is the first systematic review of the community archives literature.
  2. Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023) 0.01
    0.009212566 = product of:
      0.036850262 = sum of:
        0.036850262 = product of:
          0.05527539 = sum of:
            0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019974224 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
            0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035301168 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2023 13:51:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1170-1184
  3. Kitzie, V.L.; Wagner, T.L.; Lookingbill, V.; Vera, N.: Advancing information practices theoretical discourses centered on marginality, community, and embodiment : learning from the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA+) communities (2022) 0.00
    0.0024025259 = product of:
      0.009610103 = sum of:
        0.009610103 = product of:
          0.02883031 = sum of:
            0.02883031 = weight(_text_:science in 1074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02883031 = score(doc=1074,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 1074, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1074)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This conceptual paper identifies future directions for information practices theoretical discourses addressing marginality, community, and embodiment. We extend arguments from critical research identifying how existing discourses fail to capture the nuanced, lived experiences of people and communities confronting marginalization, predominantly via their reinforcement of deficit narratives. We then connect a series of qualitative projects examining the information practices of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual communities in the American South with relevant Library and Information Science (LIS) research to examine how marginality, community, and embodiment shape these practices. Specifically, we introduce a conceptual model that describes marginality by framing information practices as tactical and agentic responses to and refutations of social and structural barriers and risks. While some of the information practices of participants and communities appear to be uninformed or unsafe, they represent the products of community sharing and vetting. Embodied navigations further inform participant practices as they navigate information worlds produced and informed by their intersectional identities. These arguments coincide with key categories established within our model that describe information practices: defensive and protective, and community and self. Based on these insights, we offer directions for future research and theory to reorient existing discourses in ways that inspire middle-range theory building that fully captures people's lived experiences.
    Footnote
    Correction in: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.11, S.1341 [https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/23301643/current].
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.4, S.494-510
  4. Zhao, Y.C.; Peng, X.; Liu, Z.; Song, S.; Hansen, P.: Factors that affect asker's pay intention in trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms : from a benefit and cost perspective (2020) 0.00
    0.001387099 = product of:
      0.005548396 = sum of:
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.5, S.516-528
  5. Choi, W.; Park, M.S.; Lee, Y.: Associations between mastery of life and everyday life information-seeking behavior among older adults : analysis of the Pew Research Center's information engaged and information wary survey data (2022) 0.00
    0.001387099 = product of:
      0.005548396 = sum of:
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.3, S.393-406
  6. Savolainen, R.; Thomson, L.: Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices (2022) 0.00
    0.001387099 = product of:
      0.005548396 = sum of:
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.4, S.511-527