Search (118 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.03
    0.033913795 = product of:
      0.10174138 = sum of:
        0.10174138 = sum of:
          0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063417666 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038323715 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study provides evidence on the actual information-seeking behaviour of students in a digital scholarly environment, not what they thought they did. It also compares student information-seeking behaviour with that of other academic communities, and, in some cases, for practitioners. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered as part of CIBER's ongoing Virtual Scholar programme. In particular log data from two digital journals libraries, Blackwell Synergy and OhioLINK, and one e-book collection (Oxford Scholarship Online) are utilized. Findings - The study showed a distinctive form of information-seeking behaviour associated with students and differences between them and other members of the academic community. For example, students constituted the biggest users in terms of sessions and pages viewed, and they were more likely to undertake longer online sessions. Undergraduates and postgraduates were the most likely users of library links to access scholarly databases, suggesting an important "hot link" role for libraries. Originality/value - Few studies have focused on the actual (rather than perceived) information-seeking behaviour of students. The study fills that gap.
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
  2. Hemmig, W.S.: ¬The information-seeking behavior of visual artists : a literature review (2008) 0.03
    0.028261498 = product of:
      0.08478449 = sum of:
        0.08478449 = sum of:
          0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05284806 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
          0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03193643 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature on the information behavior of practicing visual artists to determine if a consistent model emerges and what further research is necessary. Design/methodology/approach - Works dealing with the information needs and uses relevant to the creative activities of visual artists are discussed in the paper. These works are assessed for their contributions toward understanding of the specific information behaviors of practicing artists. Findings - The results show that a consistent model of artists' information behavior emerges. However, nearly all of the literature focuses on art students, academic art faculty, or librarians, and so any claim that practicing artists fit the model is largely unsupported by research. There have been no published studies of communities of practicing visual artists. The implications of defining artists as communities of practice are discussed. Research limitations/implications - Research is proposed that studies the information behavior of communities of practicing visual artists in order to confirm or amend the existing model. Practical implications - Practitioners will have their attention drawn to an underserved user population whose information needs and behaviors have not been directly targeted for research. They will recognize the need for study of their own artist communities and the development of services for them. Originality/value - This paper directs the discussion of artists' information behavior away from the art-library-specific literature, where it has largely resided, as a means of adjusting the focus of research onto the largely unstudied and underserved communities of practicing artists.
    Date
    7. 6.2008 12:22:23
  3. Oakleaf, M.: Using rubrics to assess information literacy : an examination of methodology and interrater reliability (2009) 0.02
    0.018307107 = product of:
      0.054921318 = sum of:
        0.054921318 = product of:
          0.109842636 = sum of:
            0.109842636 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109842636 = score(doc=2794,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.5172295 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Academic librarians seeking to assess information literacy skills often focus on testing as a primary means of evaluation. Educators have long recognized the limitations of tests, and these limitations cause many educators to prefer rubric assessment to test-based approaches to evaluation. In contrast, many academic librarians are unfamiliar with the benefits of rubrics. Those librarians who have explored the use of information literacy rubrics have not taken a rigorous approach to methodology and interrater reliability. This article seeks to remedy these omissions by describing the benefits of a rubric-based approach to information literacy assessment, identifying a methodology for using rubrics to assess information literacy skills, and analyzing the interrater reliability of information literacy rubrics in the hands of university librarians, faculty, and students. Study results demonstrate that Cohen's can be effectively employed to check interrater reliability. The study also indicates that rubric training sessions improve interrater reliability among librarians, faculty, and students.
  4. Ulrich, P.S.: Collaborative Digital Reference Service : Weltweites Projekt (2001) 0.02
    0.017032763 = product of:
      0.051098287 = sum of:
        0.051098287 = product of:
          0.102196574 = sum of:
            0.102196574 = weight(_text_:22 in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102196574 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2002 17:30:22
  5. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.01
    0.014903667 = product of:
      0.044711 = sum of:
        0.044711 = product of:
          0.089422 = sum of:
            0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089422 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  6. International yearbook of library and information management : 2001/2002 information services in an electronic environment (2001) 0.01
    0.014903667 = product of:
      0.044711 = sum of:
        0.044711 = product of:
          0.089422 = sum of:
            0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089422 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 13:22:23
  7. Herrmann, C.: Partikulare Konkretion universal zugänglicher Information : Beobachtungen zur Konzeptionierung fachlicher Internet-Seiten am Beispiel der Theologie (2000) 0.01
    0.014903667 = product of:
      0.044711 = sum of:
        0.044711 = product of:
          0.089422 = sum of:
            0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089422 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:29:08
  8. O'Connor, L.: Information literacy as professional legitimation : the quest for professional jurisdiction (2009) 0.01
    0.014092816 = product of:
      0.042278446 = sum of:
        0.042278446 = product of:
          0.08455689 = sum of:
            0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08455689 = score(doc=2401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine how the professionalization of school and academic librarianship contributed to the establishment of information literacy as a form of legitimation. Design/methodology/approach - Historical analysis via Abbott. Findings - The need to obtain and maintain professional status did place school and academic librarians in a vulnerable position during a time of change that forced them to seek a new jurisdiciton of expertise. Originality/value - Important for the profession to examine the context of the emergence of a current and important framework.
  9. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  10. Literaturversorgung für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Arbeitsteilung und Kooperation zwischen der ZBW Kiel und der USB Köln (2002) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 2.2003 14:18:22
  11. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Seeking meaning : a process approach to library and information services (2003) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=4585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:58:22
  12. Janes, J.; Hill, C.; Rolfe, A.: Ask-an-expert services analysis (2001) 0.01
    0.012456408 = product of:
      0.03736922 = sum of:
        0.03736922 = product of:
          0.07473844 = sum of:
            0.07473844 = weight(_text_:methodology in 6847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07473844 = score(doc=6847,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.35193008 = fieldWeight in 6847, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the history and emergence of non-library commercial and noncommercial information services on the World Wide Web. These services are referred to as "expert services," while the term "digital reference" is reserved for library-related on-line information services. Following suggestions in library and information literature regarding quality standards for digital reference, researchers make clear the importance of developing a practicable methodology for critical examination of expert services, and consideration of their relevance to library and other professional information services. A methodology for research in this area and initial data are described. Two hundred forty questions were asked of 20 expert service sites. Findings include performance measures such as response rate, response time, and verifiable answers. Sites responded to 70% of all questions, and gave verifiable answers to 69% of factual questions. Performance was generally highest for factual type questions. Because expert services are likely to continue to fill a niche for factual questions in the digital reference environment, implications for further research and the development of digital reference services may be appropriately turned to source questions. This is contrary to current practice and the emergence of digital reference services reported in related literature thus far.
  13. Rowley, J.; Urquhart, C.: Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services : lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, part 1 (2007) 0.01
    0.012456408 = product of:
      0.03736922 = sum of:
        0.03736922 = product of:
          0.07473844 = sum of:
            0.07473844 = weight(_text_:methodology in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07473844 = score(doc=449,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.35193008 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This two-part article establishes a model of the mediating factors that influence student information behavior concerning electronic or digital information sources that support their learning. The first part reviews the literature that underpinned the development of the research methodology for the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) User Behavior Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, as well as the literature that has subsequently helped to develop the model over the 5 years the Framework operated in the United Kingdom, in five cycles of research that were adjusted to meet the emerging needs of the JISC at the time. The literature review attempts to synthesize the two main perspectives in the research studies: (a) smallscale studies of student information behavior; and (b) the studies that focus on the quantitative usage of particular electronic information services in universities, often including implications for training and support. As the review indicates, there are gaps in the evidence concerning the browsing and selection strategies of undergraduate students and the interaction of some of the mediating influences on information behavior. The Framework developed a multimethod, qualitative and quantitative methodology for the continued monitoring of user behavior. This article discusses the methods used and the projectmanagement challenges involved, and concludes that at the outset, intended impacts need to be specified carefully, and that funding needs to be committed at that point for a longitudinal study. A research project on information behavior, intended to inform current policymaking on infrastructure provision, is inherently difficult as behavior changes lag behind provision.
  14. Marcella, R.; Baxter, G.; Moore, N.: Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of information need in the context of the impact of new information and communications technologies on the communication of parliamentary information (2002) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 4469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=4469,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 4469, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4469)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses critically the theoretical and methodological background to an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) research project designed to investigate the impact of information and communications technologies (ICTs) on the communication of parliamentary and legislative information to the general public or citizen. It sets out the context of the study in terms of the changes in governance, resulting from devolution and, via a wide ranging literature review, describes the ways in which the authors' research approach has developed. The design of the project methodology, that of an interactive online interview executed via a roadshow, is also described.
  15. Kurbanoglu, S.S.; Akkoyunlu, B.; Umay, A.: Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale (2006) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The main aim of this paper is to describe the development of a scale designed to measure self-efficacy for information literacy. Design/methodology/approach - Cronbach's alpha, item analysis and item discrimination indices, principal component analysis, varimax rotation, and discriminant validity were used to measure reliability and validity of the scale. A 28-item refined version of the scale was found highly reliable and of reasonable length. Findings - Further refinement based on principal component analysis indicated three major components, which allow approaching information literacy skills regarding to their complexity levels. Originality/value - The information literacy self-efficacy scale is recommended to identify individuals with low self-efficacy beliefs, which may be a significantly limiting factor for them to explore their information literacy skills.
  16. Parirokh, M.; Daneshgar, F.; Fattahi, R.: Identifying knowledge-sharing requirements in academic libraries (2008) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an evaluation of the existing state of practice in knowledge sharing in university libraries. Design/methodology/approach - This is survey research which is based on an electronic questionnaire. Findings - Results reveal that the majority of libraries investigated are quite friendly towards knowledge sharing, and the majority of librarians value the importance of knowledge sharing. Results also confirm that the knowledge that they mostly use is mainly intangible knowledge. Originality/value - If knowledge-sharing requirements of librarians while collaboratively performing reference and information services can be acknowledged, guidelines for enhancing conceptual collaborative process would be suggested.
  17. Church, J.: ¬The evolving Information Commons (2005) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To examine the changing nature and adaptation of the Information Commons concept at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Design/methodology/approach - This article is primarily a case study on the growth and development of technology at Lied Library, including its expansion beyond the physical confines of the original model of the Information Commons. Additionally, a cross-section of articles regarding the principles of providing services and systems within an Information Commons is surveyed. Findings - Stresses the importance of maintaining a flexible model for the integration of technology and library services. Practical implications - A matter-of-fact source for the implications of rethinking and reinventing the Information Commons concept. Originality/value - This article addresses considerations important to the integration and evolution of technology services and space within academic libraries.
  18. Bürger, T.: Informationszentrum? Forschungsbibliothek? Dienstleister? : Zum Strukturwandel wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (2006) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    4. 3.2006 16:29:22
  19. Klein, A.; Leichtweiß, A.: Vom Quiz zur Prüfung : der Einsatz von Testverfahren bei der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz (2009) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28
  20. Ma, W.: ¬A database selection expert system based on reference librarians's database selection strategy : a usability and empirical evaluation (2002) 0.01
    0.010569612 = product of:
      0.031708833 = sum of:
        0.031708833 = product of:
          0.063417666 = sum of:
            0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063417666 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital information resources and electronic databases challenges libraries and demands that libraries develop new mechanisms to facilitate and better inform user selection of electronic databases and search tools. We developed a prototype, Web-based database selection expert system based on reference librarian's database selection strategy. This system allows users to simultaneously search all databases available to identify databases most relevant to their quests using free-text keywords or phrases taken directly from their research topics. This article reports on (1) the initial usability test and evaluation of the Selector-the test design, methodology used, performance results; (2) summary of search query analyses; (3) user satisfaction measures; (4) the use of the findings for further modification of the Selector; and (5) the findings of using randomly selected subjects to perform a usability test with predefined searching scenarios. Future prospects of this research have also been discussed in the article.

Languages

  • e 82
  • d 35
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 101
  • m 15
  • s 7
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications