Search (1285 results, page 1 of 65)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  1. Law, D.: ¬Die Bereitstellung elektronischer Informationsdienste und die Hochschulinformationspolitik : das Modell Großbritannien (1998) 0.04
    0.041847467 = product of:
      0.16738987 = sum of:
        0.1151061 = weight(_text_:modell in 2359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1151061 = score(doc=2359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5315063 = fieldWeight in 2359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2359)
        0.052283775 = product of:
          0.07842566 = sum of:
            0.03939 = weight(_text_:29 in 2359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03939 = score(doc=2359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2359)
            0.03903566 = weight(_text_:22 in 2359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03903566 = score(doc=2359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2359)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.78-80
  2. Kumar, S.: From reference service to information retrieval (1992) 0.04
    0.03835981 = product of:
      0.10229283 = sum of:
        0.020809827 = weight(_text_:information in 5028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020809827 = score(doc=5028,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5028, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5028)
        0.061788 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061788 = score(doc=5028,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 5028, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5028)
        0.019695 = product of:
          0.059085 = sum of:
            0.059085 = weight(_text_:29 in 5028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059085 = score(doc=5028,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5028, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5028)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses and compares the relative merits of manual searching and computerized information retrieval (online and CD-ROM) for answering reference questions
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 29(1992) no.4, S.165-168
  3. Herrmann, C.: Partikulare Konkretion universal zugänglicher Information : Beobachtungen zur Konzeptionierung fachlicher Internet-Seiten am Beispiel der Theologie (2000) 0.03
    0.02716596 = product of:
      0.10866384 = sum of:
        0.017167233 = weight(_text_:information in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017167233 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
        0.09149661 = product of:
          0.13724491 = sum of:
            0.0689325 = weight(_text_:29 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0689325 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
            0.0683124 = weight(_text_:22 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0683124 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:29:08
  4. Schaefer, M.T.: Internet information retrieval for libraries : four keys & sites that use them (1998) 0.03
    0.026698142 = product of:
      0.07119504 = sum of:
        0.016991155 = weight(_text_:information in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016991155 = score(doc=99,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.041192 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041192 = score(doc=99,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.013011887 = product of:
          0.03903566 = sum of:
            0.03903566 = weight(_text_:22 in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03903566 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Provides illustrative examples of the methods, tools and resources that enable librarians, information specialists and end users to make the most of the WWW. The 4 key factors that facilitate access are location, evaluation, organization and communication. Outlines how a number of sistes make use of these factors. Describes: the Internet Library for Librarians, Argus Clearinghouse's Digital Librarian's Award; FEDSTATS, the University Library System, chines University of Hong Kong, the WWW Virtual Library, the Finnish Virtual Library Project, and BIBNET
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:19:44
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 33(1998) no.8, S.1-3
  5. Sobottka, G.: Informationskompetenz für Studienanfänger : Planung, Konzeption, Realisierung (Modell Romanistik Freiburg) (2003) 0.02
    0.024044268 = product of:
      0.09617707 = sum of:
        0.08632957 = weight(_text_:modell in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08632957 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.39862972 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
        0.0098475 = product of:
          0.0295425 = sum of:
            0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0295425 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  6. Knauerhase, A.: GMMIK ['gi-mik] : ein Modell der Informationskompetenz (2010) 0.02
    0.021582393 = product of:
      0.17265914 = sum of:
        0.17265914 = weight(_text_:modell in 4282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17265914 = score(doc=4282,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.79725945 = fieldWeight in 4282, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4282)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Das GMMIK (Gewichtetes modulares Modell der Informationskompetenz) versucht den aktuellen, veränderten Ansprüchen an die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz gerecht zu werden und insgesamt den Blick auf die Informationskompetenz zu erneuern. Die Modifikationen, die das GMMIK von den bestehenden IK-Modellen unterscheidet, betreffen einerseits Ergänzungen und Erweiterungen und andererseits die Betrachtungsweise auf das Konstrukt Kompetenz an sich. Die Aspekte "Quellenbewertung/-kritik" und "Informationsvernetzung/-verknüpfung" halten erstmals als eigenständige und entscheidende Säulen von Informationskompetenz Einzug in ein theoretisches Modell. Die Einbeziehung der Ethik ist eine weitere zentrale Neuerung im GMMIK. Der verantwortungsvolle Umgang mit Informationen ist untrennbarer Bestandteil informationskompetenten Handelns. Das Modell basiert auf einer Vision einer zeitlosen Definition von Informationskompetenz, in der sich jeder wieder finden kann und die jeden berücksichtigt.
  7. Foster, J.: Collaborative information seeking and retrieval (2006) 0.02
    0.02150018 = product of:
      0.08600072 = sum of:
        0.027746437 = weight(_text_:information in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027746437 = score(doc=4321,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
        0.058254283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058254283 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  8. Preuss, V.: User-centered counseling in online retrieval : practise and training (1983) 0.02
    0.02150018 = product of:
      0.08600072 = sum of:
        0.027746437 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027746437 = score(doc=5165,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
        0.058254283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058254283 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    7th International online information meeting, London, 6.-8.12.1983
  9. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking (2014) 0.02
    0.020357246 = product of:
      0.05428599 = sum of:
        0.020334737 = weight(_text_:information in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020334737 = score(doc=1193,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
        0.025744999 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025744999 = score(doc=1193,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
        0.008206251 = product of:
          0.024618752 = sum of:
            0.024618752 = weight(_text_:29 in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024618752 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The notions that information seeking is not always a solitary activity and that people working in collaboration for information intensive tasks should be studied and supported have become more prevalent in recent years. Several new research questions, methodologies, and systems have emerged around these notions that may prove to be useful beyond the field of collaborative information seeking (CIS), with relevance to the broader area of information seeking and behavior. This article provides an overview of such key research work from a variety of domains, including library and information science, computer-supported cooperative work, human-computer interaction, and information retrieval. It starts with explanations of collaboration and how CIS fits in different contexts, emphasizing the interactive, intentional, and mutually beneficial nature of CIS activities. Relations to similar and related fields such as collaborative information retrieval, collaborative information behavior, and collaborative filtering are also clarified. Next, the article presents a synthesis of various frameworks and models that exist in the field today, along with a new synthesis of 12 different dimensions of group activities. A discussion on issues and approaches relating to evaluating various parameters in CIS follows. Finally, a list of known issues and challenges is presented to provide an overview of research opportunities in this field.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:08:31
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.215-236
  10. Franke, F; Klein, A.; Schüller-Zwierlein, A.: Schlüsselkompetenzen : Literatur recherchieren in Bibliotheken und Internet (2010) 0.02
    0.02034483 = product of:
      0.054252878 = sum of:
        0.0120145595 = weight(_text_:information in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0120145595 = score(doc=4721,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.035673317 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035673317 = score(doc=4721,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.32745665 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.0065650004 = product of:
          0.019695 = sum of:
            0.019695 = weight(_text_:29 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019695 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2011 12:21:48
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval / Bibliothek / Internet (BVB)
    Information Retrieval / Internet / Bibliothek / Lehrbuch (BVB)
    Subject
    Information Retrieval / Bibliothek / Internet (BVB)
    Information Retrieval / Internet / Bibliothek / Lehrbuch (BVB)
    Information retrieval
  11. Böller, N.; Herget, J.; Hierl, S.: Knowledge-enhancing Helix : Herausbildung und Entwicklung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz durch systemgestütztes kollaboratives Arbeiten in der universitären Ausbildung. Eine Fallstudie (2007) 0.02
    0.020153018 = product of:
      0.08061207 = sum of:
        0.008670762 = weight(_text_:information in 707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008670762 = score(doc=707,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 707, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=707)
        0.07194131 = weight(_text_:modell in 707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07194131 = score(doc=707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.33219144 = fieldWeight in 707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=707)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Informations- und Medienkompetenz gehören in der Informationsgesellschaft zu den wichtigsten Schlüsselqualifikationen. Ebenso gewinnen Aspekte wie Teamarbeit und Wissensaustausch im Berufsleben zunehmend an Bedeutung; kollaborative Arbeitsstile werden in der neuen informationell vernetzten Arbeitsumgebung dominant. Die berufsqualifizierende Ausbildung an Hochschulen ist somit mit immer neuen Herausforderungen konfrontiert: traditionelle Formen und Methoden der Hochschullehre wie das Schreiben wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten, Vorlesungen, Referate, Seminare oder Gruppenarbeiten genügen nicht mehr, um all diese Kompetenzen herauszubilden und den Herausforderungen des Berufslebens und der Informationsgesellschaft gerecht zu werden. Das Konzept "DIAMOND" (DIdactical Approach for Media cOmpeteNce Development) schafft einen Bezugrahmen für eine in das Curriculum integrierte umfassende und aktive Vermittlung von Methoden-, Sozial-, Fach-, Medien- und Informationskompetenz. Das über mehrere Jahre hinweg entwickelte und mehrfach erprobte Kursframework folgt einem aus sechs Bausteinen bestehendem Modell. Jeder Baustein (kontextuell, technisch, didaktisch, methodisch, pädagogisch, inhaltlich) besteht aus verschiedenen Aspekten, die in ihrer Gesamtheit die Herausbildung und Entwicklung von Schlüsselkompetenzen bei Studierenden ermöglichen und fördern. Der zugrundeliegende Ansatz des Blended Learning wird hierbei in mehrwertschaffender Form mit diversen neuen Medien und Systemunterstützungen (Topic Map basierte eLearningwebseite, Mediawiki, Lernplattform etc.) ergänzt, die in einem den Lehr- und Lernpozess unterstützenden Framework integriert sind. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf einem kollaborativen Ansatz mit Hilfe einer WIKI-Software. Dieser umfassende didaktische Ansatz wird seit mehreren Jahren im ersten Semester des Studiums der Informationswissenschaft an der Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Chur (HTW), University of Applied Science, im Grundlagenmodul erfolgreich eingesetzt und kontinuierlich weiterentwickelt.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 133 - Academic and Research Libraries with Information Literacy
  12. Auster, E.; Lawton, S.B.: ¬The negotiation process in on-line bibliographic retrieval (1979) 0.02
    0.019468494 = product of:
      0.077873975 = sum of:
        0.019619694 = weight(_text_:information in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019619694 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.058254283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058254283 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 4(1979) May, S.86-98
  13. Smet, E. de: Evaluation of a computerised community information system through transaction analysis and user survey (1995) 0.02
    0.01940209 = product of:
      0.05173891 = sum of:
        0.01486726 = weight(_text_:information in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01486726 = score(doc=2304,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
        0.02548625 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02548625 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
        0.0113854 = product of:
          0.0341562 = sum of:
            0.0341562 = weight(_text_:22 in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0341562 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the results of a transaction analysis and user survey, evaluating a pilot system for computerized community information in a public library, based on the GDIS system (Gemeenschaps Informatie Documentair System). The non hierarchical and global approach to the integrated database proved to be useful for novice users. Out of many parameters only frequency of use correlates with retrieval success. The online questionnaire proved to be worthwhile although restricted in scope. The logbook transaction analysis yielded a rich amount of useful management information for the systems managers. The user survey yielded a rich set of data on which to perform statistical analyses according to social science practice, from which some interesting relations could be detected
    Date
    23.10.1995 19:22:11
  14. Auster, E.; Lawton, S.B.: Search interview techniques and information gain as antecedents of user satisfaction with online bibliographic retrieval (1984) 0.02
    0.018812658 = product of:
      0.07525063 = sum of:
        0.024278132 = weight(_text_:information in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024278132 = score(doc=5156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
        0.0509725 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509725 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 35(1984) no.2, S.90-103
  15. Homann, B.: ¬Das dynamische Modell der Informationskompetenz (DYMIK) als Grundlage für bibliothekarische Schulungen (2000) 0.02
    0.017804567 = product of:
      0.14243653 = sum of:
        0.14243653 = weight(_text_:modell in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14243653 = score(doc=5490,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.65770555 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sind Institutionen mit umfangreichem Expertenwissen auf dem Gebiet der neuen Informationssysteme. Sie können mit eigenen Schulungen mitwirken bei der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz. Der Umfang der zu vermittelnden Kompetenzen erfordert mehrere Schulungsveranstaltungen. Diese müssen inhaltlich und methodisch aufeinander abgestimmt werden. Hierfür eignen sich umfassende Modelle, die die wesentlichen Strukturen und Einflußfaktoren von Informationsprozessen repräsentieren. Ein solches Modell ist DYMIK, das an der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg entwickelt wurde, um das modulare Schulungsangebot didaktisch und methodisch zu verbessern und um intemetbasierte Tutorials zu erweitern
  16. Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The influence of Taylor's paper, Question-Negotiation and Information-Seeking in Libraries (2013) 0.02
    0.017529545 = product of:
      0.046745453 = sum of:
        0.020334737 = weight(_text_:information in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020334737 = score(doc=2713,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
        0.018204464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018204464 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
        0.008206251 = product of:
          0.024618752 = sum of:
            0.024618752 = weight(_text_:29 in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024618752 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This study uses bibliometric analysis and citation context analysis to identify the influence of the main concepts embedded in Taylor's 1968 classic article entitled Question-Negotiation and Information-Seeking in Libraries. This study analyses articles published between 1969 and 2010 which cite Taylor's article. The results show that Taylor's article on a question-negotiation model is increasingly visible and its influence is not limited to the discipline of library and information science. Of the 14 cited concepts identified, the concept of "four levels of information needs" was cited most (31.7%), followed by "question negotiation" (20.5%) and "other concepts relating to information needs" (17.9%). The results indicate an increasing trend in the citations of "four levels of information needs" and this concept also received the most attention from information retrieval research. A decreasing trend was evident for the concept of "question negotiation" and this concept was frequently cited by reference service researchers. In addition, among the 10 citation functions, "related literature" was dominant (30.8%). Both "evidence" and "views" were in second place with the same percentage (18.7%), followed by "terms" (9.2%) and "background information" (7.2%). A decreasing trend was identified in the top three citation functions, whereas an increasing trend was observed in the "term" and "background information" functions.
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Taylor, R.S.: Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. In: College and research libraries. 29(1968) no.3, S.178-194.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.5, S.983-994
  17. Wildemuth, B.M.; Cogdill, K.; Friedman, C.P.: ¬The transition from formalized need to compromised need in the context of clinical problem solving : opportunities and possible problems for information use studies of health professionals (1999) 0.02
    0.017302401 = product of:
      0.04613974 = sum of:
        0.012262309 = weight(_text_:information in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012262309 = score(doc=189,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.025744999 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025744999 = score(doc=189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.00813243 = product of:
          0.024397288 = sum of:
            0.024397288 = weight(_text_:22 in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024397288 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Almost 30 years ago, Taylor (1968) postulated that each information need moves along a continuum from the visceral need through the compromised need. The current study examines the final transition in this continuum: from formalized need (expressed in an explicit verbal statement) to compromised need (represented in the language of the retrieval system). This transition is primarily concerned with vocabulary: the searcher attempts to translate an explicit statement of need into a search term (or terms) that can be interpreted by the retrieval system. A few studies have empirically examined the match between the end-user searcher's formalized need and the compromised need (i.e., search terms). Markey (1984) compared the searcher's expressed topic (the formalized need, expressed in just a few words) and the search terms (the compromised need), and then went on to compare the search terms with the library catalog terms available for subject searching. She found that the search term matched or was a partial form of the expressed topic in 71% of the searches, and that over 75% of these searches matched a catalog term. Allen (1991) examined the relationship between logical reasoning ability and selection of search terms. He asked college students to read a magazine article (which could be seen as a very rich statement of the formalized need) and then to perform a search for articles on the same topic (expressing the compromised need).
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:54:11
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  18. Klugmann, S.: Online information retrieval interface with traditional reference services (1986) 0.02
    0.017034933 = product of:
      0.06813973 = sum of:
        0.017167233 = weight(_text_:information in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017167233 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
        0.0509725 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509725 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  19. Rogers, R.: Teaching information skills : a review of the research and its impact on education (1993) 0.02
    0.016305279 = product of:
      0.065221116 = sum of:
        0.024029119 = weight(_text_:information in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024029119 = score(doc=776,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
        0.041192 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041192 = score(doc=776,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    COMPASS
    Schools / Curriculum / Information retrieval
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International journal of information and library research. 6(1994) nos.1/2, S.82-84 (R. Downing)
    LCSH
    Information services / Great Britain / User education
    Subject
    Information services / Great Britain / User education
    Schools / Curriculum / Information retrieval
  20. White, M.D.: Questions in reference interviews (1998) 0.02
    0.016280675 = product of:
      0.043415133 = sum of:
        0.013709677 = weight(_text_:information in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013709677 = score(doc=4720,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
        0.018204464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018204464 = score(doc=4720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
        0.011500991 = product of:
          0.034502972 = sum of:
            0.034502972 = weight(_text_:22 in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034502972 = score(doc=4720,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article characterises the questioning behaviour in reference interviews preceding delegated online searches of bibliographic databases and relates it to questioning behaviour in other types of interviews/settings. With one exception, the unit of analysis is the question (N=610), not the interview. The author uses A.C. Graesser's typology of questions to analyse type of question and M.D. White's typology of information categories to determine the question's content objective; this is the first application of Graesser's typology to interview questions in any setting. Graesser's categories allow for a more subtle understanding of the kind of information need underlying a question. Comparisons are made between questions asked by the information specialist and those asked by the client. Findings show that the information specialist dominates the interview, about half the questions were verification questions and about 22% were judgemental questions or requests; all but four types of questions from Graesser's categories appeared in the interviews, but no new question types were discovered. Clients often phrase questions as requests. In content, both clients and information specialists focus on the subject and service requested, but the clients ask also about search strategy and output features. Both parties ask predominantly short-answer questions. Results are related to interface design for retrieval systems.
    Date
    2.12.2005 14:48:22

Languages

Types

  • a 1074
  • m 139
  • s 59
  • el 13
  • r 13
  • x 11
  • b 9
  • i 3
  • ? 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications