Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.0053333133 = product of:
  0.03199988 = sum of:
    0.03199988 = product of:
      0.06399976 = sum of:
        0.06399976 = weight(_text_:addresses in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06399976 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.31629908 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
  2. Capurro, R.: Information ethics for and from Africa (2008) 0.01 
    0.0053333133 = product of:
  0.03199988 = sum of:
    0.03199988 = product of:
      0.06399976 = sum of:
        0.06399976 = weight(_text_:addresses in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06399976 = score(doc=1869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.31629908 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The first part of this article deals with some initiatives concerning the role of information ethics for Africa, such as the New Partnership for Africa's Development, United Nations Information Communications Technology (ICT), and the African Information Society Initiative particularly since the World Summit on the Information Society. Information Ethics from Africa is a young academic field, and not much has been published so far on the impact of ICT on African societies and cultures from a philosophical perspective. The second part of the article analyzes some recent research on this matter particularly with regard to the concept of ubuntu. Finally, the article addresses some issues of the African Conference on Information Ethics held February 3-5, 2007, in Pretoria, South Africa.[The following essay is adapted from a keynote address delivered at the Africa Information Ethics Conference in Pretoria, South Africa, February 5-7, 2007. Under the patronage of UNESCO, sponsored by the South African government, and organized with assistance from the Department of Information Science at the University of Pretoria, the School of Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and the supporters and members of the International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE), the theme of the conference was Ethical Challenges in the Information Age: The Joy of Sharing Knowledge. The full version of the address as well as selected articles from the conference were published in Vol. 7 of ICIE's online journal, International Review of Information Ethics (for more information, visit http://icie.zkm.de)]
  3. Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.; Fernández-Molina, J.C.; Pinho, F.A.; Oliveira Milani, S.: Ethics in the knowledge organization environment : an overview of values and problems in the LIS literature (2008) 0.01 
    0.0050538294 = product of:
  0.030322976 = sum of:
    0.030322976 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030322976 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Reflections on Information Science have been focused mostly on information access and dissemination, not on ethical aspects of knowledge organization and representation (KOR). This leads us to investigate the existence of ethical values - and problems - which have impact on this field, especially since they are not discussed, although they are revealed in everyday practice. Therefore, and trying to contribute to a further reflection on the lack of literature on ethics in KOR, this paper analyses the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology JASIST, Journal of Documentation, Knowledge Organization, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, The Indexer and Ethics and Information Technology in the period between 1995 and 2004. The results reveal two complementary dimensions: one concerning the respect of diversity and the other concerning the specificity warrant. The latter, which may prove the relevance of the theoretical principles announced by Hudon (1997), Beghtol (2002, 2005) and Garcia Gutierrez (2002), relative to a transcultural ethics of mediation that reflects diversity (fitted with a precision that, many times, passes by the dimension of multilingualism), making use of tools that may provide cultural warrant to knowledge representation.
  4. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  5. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  6. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.00 
    0.0027929894 = product of:
  0.016757935 = sum of:
    0.016757935 = product of:
      0.03351587 = sum of:
        0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03351587 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  7. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00 
    0.0019949926 = product of:
  0.011969955 = sum of:
    0.011969955 = product of:
      0.02393991 = sum of:
        0.02393991 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02393991 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  8. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.0013964947 = product of:
  0.008378968 = sum of:
    0.008378968 = product of:
      0.016757935 = sum of:
        0.016757935 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016757935 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  9. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.0011969954 = product of:
  0.0071819723 = sum of:
    0.0071819723 = product of:
      0.0143639445 = sum of:
        0.0143639445 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0143639445 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.

Authors

Languages