Search (141 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.05 
    0.046282627 = product of:
  0.09256525 = sum of:
    0.09256525 = sum of:
      0.0046730246 = weight(_text_:a in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0046730246 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544656 = queryNorm
          0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044790562 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544656 = queryNorm
          0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043101672 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544656 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  2. Capurro, R.; Wiegerling, K.; Brellochs, A.: Informationsethik (1995) 0.03 
    0.032975726 = product of:
  0.06595145 = sum of:
    0.06595145 = product of:
      0.09892717 = sum of:
        0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009346049 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
        0.089581124 = weight(_text_:k in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089581124 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. McGarry, K.: ¬The ethics of information : its relevance in the curriculum (Abstract) (1992) 0.03 
    0.028264908 = product of:
  0.056529816 = sum of:
    0.056529816 = product of:
      0.08479472 = sum of:
        0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0080109 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
        0.07678382 = weight(_text_:k in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07678382 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  4. Niedermair, K.: Gefährden Suchmaschinen und Discovery-Systeme die informationelle Autonomie? (2014) 0.03 
    0.028264908 = product of:
  0.056529816 = sum of:
    0.056529816 = product of:
      0.08479472 = sum of:
        0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0080109 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
        0.07678382 = weight(_text_:k in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07678382 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  5. Wiegerling, K.: Was ist Medienethik? (1999) 0.02 
    0.023554087 = product of:
  0.047108173 = sum of:
    0.047108173 = product of:
      0.07066226 = sum of:
        0.006675749 = weight(_text_:a in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006675749 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.06398651 = weight(_text_:k in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06398651 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  6. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.02 
    0.018937267 = product of:
  0.037874535 = sum of:
    0.037874535 = product of:
      0.056811802 = sum of:
        0.0075527485 = weight(_text_:a in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075527485 = score(doc=2833,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
    Type
    a
  7. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.02 
    0.018937267 = product of:
  0.037874535 = sum of:
    0.037874535 = product of:
      0.056811802 = sum of:
        0.0075527485 = weight(_text_:a in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075527485 = score(doc=248,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Having reached the US Supreme Court in 1997, the Communications Decency Act (1996) has strong implications for Internet service providers. How to protect children while not denying adult rights of access is an issue which has impacted successively upon motion pictures, reading materials, radio, television and cable. The case for freedom of electronic speech appears compelling. The problems of obscenity, encryption (cryptography) and provocative 'cyberspeech' on the Internet offers a field day for litigation
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
    Type
    a
  8. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.02 
    0.018199885 = product of:
  0.03639977 = sum of:
    0.03639977 = product of:
      0.054599654 = sum of:
        0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053405995 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
    Type
    a
  9. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.02 
    0.018199885 = product of:
  0.03639977 = sum of:
    0.03639977 = product of:
      0.054599654 = sum of:
        0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053405995 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Type
    a
  10. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.02 
    0.018199885 = product of:
  0.03639977 = sum of:
    0.03639977 = product of:
      0.054599654 = sum of:
        0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053405995 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
    Type
    a
  11. Cronin, B.; Overfelt, K.: ¬The scholar's courtesy : a survey of acknowledgement behaviour (1994) 0.02 
    0.01762816 = product of:
  0.03525632 = sum of:
    0.03525632 = product of:
      0.052884478 = sum of:
        0.008093917 = weight(_text_:a in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008093917 = score(doc=2461,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044790562 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scholars in major US research universities were surveyed to explore the normative bases of acknowledgement behaviour. Measures of agreement and divergence were established in respect of five issue sets pertaining to acknowledgement practice: expectations, etiquette, ethics, equity and evaluation. The results confirm the substantive role played by acknowledgements in the primary communication process. Although few formal rules exist, it is clear that many scholars subscribe to the idea of a governing etiquette. The findings also suggest that acknowledgement data could be mined to lay bare the rules of engagement that define the dynamics of collaboration and interdependence among scholars
    Type
    a
  12. Chan, M.; Daniels, J.; Furger, S.; Rasmussen, D.; Shoemaker, E.; Snow, K.: ¬The development and future of the cataloguing code of ethics (2022) 0.02 
    0.01762816 = product of:
  0.03525632 = sum of:
    0.03525632 = product of:
      0.052884478 = sum of:
        0.008093917 = weight(_text_:a in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008093917 = score(doc=1149,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044790562 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Cataloguing Code of Ethics, released in January 2021, was the product of a multi-national, multi-year endeavor by the Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee to create a useful framework for the discussion of cataloging ethics. The six Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee members, based in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, recount the efforts of the group and the cataloging community leading up to the release of the Code, as well as provide their thoughts on the challenges of creating the document, lessons learned, and the future of the Code.
    Type
    a
  13. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.02 
    0.017133072 = product of:
  0.034266144 = sum of:
    0.034266144 = product of:
      0.051399216 = sum of:
        0.006608655 = weight(_text_:a in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006608655 = score(doc=1698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
        0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044790562 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  14. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.02 
    0.017065197 = product of:
  0.034130394 = sum of:
    0.034130394 = product of:
      0.051195588 = sum of:
        0.008093917 = weight(_text_:a in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008093917 = score(doc=2453,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
        0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043101672 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An awareness exists among Italian librarians of the need for an established code of ethics for library reference services. Considers the principles that such a code should incorporate; the US Commitment to Information services, for example, affirms users' rights of access to library books and resources, regardless of content and opinions expressed. Censoship is opposed and people are not barred from library use for ethnis, social or religious reasons. An ethical code would require library staff to be impartial, give attention and respect to users, allocate time properly, and avoid prejudice. Discusses the problems of library ethics which arise when user requests relate to sensitive topics e.g. euthansia, cocaine refining
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
    Type
    a
  15. Schäpers, K.: Umfang und Grenzen des Informationsdienstes in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken : Empfehlungen und Diskussionen (1991) 0.02 
    0.017063072 = product of:
  0.034126144 = sum of:
    0.034126144 = product of:
      0.10237843 = sum of:
        0.10237843 = weight(_text_:k in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10237843 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.02 
    0.017008891 = product of:
  0.034017783 = sum of:
    0.034017783 = product of:
      0.051026672 = sum of:
        0.0057813693 = weight(_text_:a in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057813693 = score(doc=1699,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
        0.0452453 = weight(_text_:k in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0452453 = score(doc=1699,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In the past, many professions and scientific disciplines decided to create a code of ethics which shall guide the professional activities of their members. The rules in these codes of ethics, sometimes called ethical guidelines, shall provide guidance in situations of moral conflict. Obviously, as other professionals or scholars, persons who are involved in knowledge organization face moral conflicts, too. Therefore, ISKO decided to discuss whether it would be necessary to create ethical guidelines for ISKO. In the paper two options to formulate a code of ethics are discussed: First, it is possible to identify moral values without formulating the way they can be achieved - this option is realised in the ethical guidelines of the German Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Second, it is feasible to clearly define morally acceptable professional actions without formulation basic moral values - this option is realised in the ACM and IEEE-CS Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. It is argued that if ISKO should decide to implement an own code of ethics it will be inevitable to choose the second option while it also will be necessary to address the specific needs of knowledge organization and its moral problems, for instance, the conflict of copyright and open access. Additionally, the second option has to be completed by basic moral values that shall underlie the professional actions of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  17. Informationsethik (1995) 0.02 
    0.015109851 = product of:
  0.030219702 = sum of:
    0.030219702 = product of:
      0.045329552 = sum of:
        0.0069376426 = weight(_text_:a in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069376426 = score(doc=2455,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
        0.03839191 = weight(_text_:k in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03839191 = score(doc=2455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge u. Kapitel: HENRICHS, N.: Menschsein im Informationszeitalter; WIEGERLING, K.: Medium und Verhalten; BOUGNOUX, D.: Qui a peur de l'information?; CAPURRO, R.: Moral issues in information science; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethical considerations in technology transfer; DOCTOR, R.D.: Information technologies and social equity: confronting the revolution; BARBES, R.F.: Ethical and legal issues raised by information technology: the professional producer-product mix; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethics, ideologies, and practices of information technology and systems; Du MONT, R.R.: Ethics in librarianship: a management model; HAUPTMANN, R.: Ethical concerns in librarianship: an overview; SWAN, J.: Ethics inside and out: the case of Guidoriccio; SMITH, M.M.: Infoethics for leaders: models of moral agency in the information environment; KOSTREWSKI, B.J. u. C. OPPENHEIM: Ethics in information science; FROHMANN, B.: Knowledge and power in information science: a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint 'Ein- u. weiterführende Bibliographie'; 'Ethik-Kodizes'
  18. Schuchart, F.: Neue Buckower Thesen : Im Mittelpunkt der Mensch? Die Technik? Oder der Konzern? (2001) 0.01 
    0.014132454 = product of:
  0.028264908 = sum of:
    0.028264908 = product of:
      0.04239736 = sum of:
        0.00400545 = weight(_text_:a in 6376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00400545 = score(doc=6376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6376)
        0.03839191 = weight(_text_:k in 6376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03839191 = score(doc=6376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 6376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6376)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Neue Medien - neues Lernen?: 4. Buckower Mediengespräche. Hrsg.: K.-D. Felsmann
    Type
    a
  19. Martin, K.: Predatory predictions and the ethics of predictive analytics (2023) 0.01 
    0.013608148 = product of:
  0.027216297 = sum of:
    0.027216297 = product of:
      0.040824443 = sum of:
        0.008831187 = weight(_text_:a in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008831187 = score(doc=946,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
        0.031993255 = weight(_text_:k in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031993255 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this paper, I critically examine ethical issues introduced by predictive analytics. I argue firms can have a market incentive to construct deceptively inflated true-positive outcomes: individuals are over-categorized as requiring a penalizing treatment and the treatment leads to mistakenly thinking this label was correct. I show that differences in power between firms developing and using predictive analytics compared to subjects can lead to firms reaping the benefits of predatory predictions while subjects can bear the brunt of the costs. While profitable, the use of predatory predictions can deceive stakeholders by inflating the measurement of accuracy, diminish the individuality of subjects, and exert arbitrary power. I then argue that firms have a responsibility to distinguish between the treatment effect and predictive power of the predictive analytics program, better internalize the costs of categorizing someone as needing a penalizing treatment, and justify the predictions of subjects and general use of predictive analytics. Subjecting individuals to predatory predictions only for a firms' efficiency and benefit is unethical and an arbitrary exertion of power. Firms developing and deploying a predictive analytics program can benefit from constructing predatory predictions while the cost is borne by the less powerful subjects of the program.
    Type
    a
  20. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.01 
    0.013206033 = product of:
  0.026412066 = sum of:
    0.026412066 = product of:
      0.039618097 = sum of:
        0.008831187 = weight(_text_:a in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008831187 = score(doc=1868,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.03078691 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03078691 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article introduces a normative principle for the behavior of contemporary computing and communication systems and considers some of its consequences. The principle, named the principle of distribution, says that in a distributed multi-agent system, control resides as much as possible with the individuals constituting the system rather than in centralized agents; and when that is unfeasible or becomes inappropriate due to environmental changes, control evolves upwards from the individuals to an appropriate intermediate level rather than being imposed from above. The setting for the work is the dynamically changing global space resulting from ubiquitous communication. Accordingly, the article begins by determining the characteristics of the distributed multi-agent space it spans. It then fleshes out the principle of distribution, with examples from daily life as well as from Computer Science. The case is made for the principle of distribution to work at various levels of abstraction of system behavior: to inform the high-level discussion that ought to precede the more low-level concerns of technology, protocols, and standardization, but also to facilitate those lower levels. Of the more substantial applications given here of the principle of distribution, a technical example concerns the design of secure ad hoc networks of mobile devices, achievable without any form of centralized authentication or identification but in a solely distributed manner. Here, the context is how the principle can be used to provide new and provably secure protocols for genuinely ubiquitous communication. A second, more managerial example concerns the distributed production and management of open-source software, and a third investigates some pertinent questions involving the dynamic restructuring of control in distributed systems, important in times of disaster or malevolence.
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 101
  • d 38
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 131
  • m 7
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications