Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.04
    0.0383089 = product of:
      0.0766178 = sum of:
        0.0766178 = sum of:
          0.03561327 = weight(_text_:web in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561327 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060529456 = queryNorm
              0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.04100453 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04100453 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060529456 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  2. Cornish, G.: ¬The ethics of information (1997) 0.03
    0.03224849 = product of:
      0.06449698 = sum of:
        0.06449698 = product of:
          0.19349092 = sum of:
            0.19349092 = weight(_text_:themes in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19349092 = score(doc=84,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on 'Info-Ethics', the 1st International Congress on Ethical, Legal and Societal Aspects of Digital Information' held at Monte Carlo in MAr 1997. Some 200 delegates from many countries attended: topics covered included the Internet and its control, and the problems of access to it for developing countries with inadequate telecommunications infrastructure. 2 main themes of the conference were the problems of multilingual information provision, and preservation and conservation in the digital environment. Discussions on the nature of ethics and the ethics of cyberspace led to consideration of whether a 'right to communicate' should be added to the International Convention on Human Rights: there may also be pressure for Unesco to establish a Commission on information ethics
  3. Slota, S.C.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Greenberg, S.; Verma, N.; Cummings, B.; Li, L.; Shenefiel, C.: Locating the work of artificial intelligence ethics (2023) 0.03
    0.02764156 = product of:
      0.05528312 = sum of:
        0.05528312 = product of:
          0.16584936 = sum of:
            0.16584936 = weight(_text_:themes in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16584936 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The scale and complexity of the data and algorithms used in artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems present significant challenges for anticipating their ethical, legal, and policy implications. Given these challenges, who does the work of AI ethics, and how do they do it? This study reports findings from interviews with 26 stakeholders in AI research, law, and policy. The primary themes are that the work of AI ethics is structured by personal values and professional commitments, and that it involves situated meaning-making through data and algorithms. Given the stakes involved, it is not enough to simply satisfy that AI will not behave unethically; rather, the work of AI ethics needs to be incentivized.
  4. Fleischmann, K.R.; Hui, C.; Wallace, W.A.: ¬The societal responsibilities of computational modelers : human values and professional codes of ethics (2017) 0.02
    0.023034632 = product of:
      0.046069264 = sum of:
        0.046069264 = product of:
          0.1382078 = sum of:
            0.1382078 = weight(_text_:themes in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1382078 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information and communication technology (ICT) has increasingly important implications for our everyday lives, with the potential to both solve existing social problems and create new ones. This article focuses on one particular group of ICT professionals, computational modelers, and explores how these ICT professionals perceive their own societal responsibilities. Specifically, the article uses a mixed-method approach to look at the role of professional codes of ethics and explores the relationship between modelers' experiences with, and attitudes toward, codes of ethics and their values. Statistical analysis of survey data reveals a relationship between modelers' values and their attitudes and experiences related to codes of ethics. Thematic analysis of interviews with a subset of survey participants identifies two key themes: that modelers should be faithful to the reality and values of users and that codes of ethics should be built from the bottom up. One important implication of the research is that those who value universalism and benevolence may have a particular duty to act on their values and advocate for, and work to develop, a code of ethics.
  5. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.02
    0.016401812 = product of:
      0.032803625 = sum of:
        0.032803625 = product of:
          0.06560725 = sum of:
            0.06560725 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06560725 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  6. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.02
    0.016401812 = product of:
      0.032803625 = sum of:
        0.032803625 = product of:
          0.06560725 = sum of:
            0.06560725 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06560725 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  7. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.02
    0.016401812 = product of:
      0.032803625 = sum of:
        0.032803625 = product of:
          0.06560725 = sum of:
            0.06560725 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06560725 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  8. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.02
    0.016401812 = product of:
      0.032803625 = sum of:
        0.032803625 = product of:
          0.06560725 = sum of:
            0.06560725 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06560725 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  9. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.02
    0.016401812 = product of:
      0.032803625 = sum of:
        0.032803625 = product of:
          0.06560725 = sum of:
            0.06560725 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06560725 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  10. San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Frías Montoya, J.A.: Ethical issues in control by algorithms : the user is the content (2023) 0.02
    0.015109429 = product of:
      0.030218858 = sum of:
        0.030218858 = product of:
          0.060437717 = sum of:
            0.060437717 = weight(_text_:web in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060437717 = score(doc=1132,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we discuss some ethical issues and challenges of the use of algorithms on the web from the perspective of knowledge organization. We review some of the problems that these algorithms and the filter bubbles pose for the users. We contextualize these issues within the user-based approaches to knowledge organization in a larger sense. We review some of the technologies that have been developed to counter these problems as well as initiatives from the knowledge organization field. We conclude with the necessity of adopting a critical and ethical stance towards the use of algorithms on the web and the need for an education in knowledge organization that addresses these issues.
  11. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.014351585 = product of:
      0.02870317 = sum of:
        0.02870317 = product of:
          0.05740634 = sum of:
            0.05740634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05740634 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  12. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01
    0.014351585 = product of:
      0.02870317 = sum of:
        0.02870317 = product of:
          0.05740634 = sum of:
            0.05740634 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05740634 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  13. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.01
    0.014245306 = product of:
      0.028490612 = sum of:
        0.028490612 = product of:
          0.056981225 = sum of:
            0.056981225 = weight(_text_:web in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056981225 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
  14. Information cultures in the digital age : a Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro (2016) 0.01
    0.01382078 = product of:
      0.02764156 = sum of:
        0.02764156 = product of:
          0.08292468 = sum of:
            0.08292468 = weight(_text_:themes in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08292468 = score(doc=4127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.21309422 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For several decades Rafael Capurro has been at the forefront of defining the relationship between information and modernity through both phenomenological and ethical formulations. In exploring both of these themes Capurro has re-vivified the transcultural and intercultural expressions of how we bring an understanding of information to bear on scientific knowledge production and intermediation. Capurro has long stressed the need to look deeply into how we contextualize the information problems that scientific society creates for us and to re-incorporate a pragmatic dimension into our response that provides a balance to the cognitive turn in information science. With contributions from 35 scholars from 15 countries, Information Cultures in the Digital Age focuses on the culture and philosophy of information, information ethics, the relationship of information to message, the historic and semiotic understanding of information, the relationship of information to power and the future of information education. This Festschrift seeks to celebrate Rafael Capurro's important contribution to a global dialogue on how information conceptualization, use and technology impact human culture and the ethical questions that arise from this dynamic relationship.
  15. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.01
    0.012464643 = product of:
      0.024929287 = sum of:
        0.024929287 = product of:
          0.049858574 = sum of:
            0.049858574 = weight(_text_:web in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049858574 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
  16. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.01
    0.010251133 = product of:
      0.020502266 = sum of:
        0.020502266 = product of:
          0.04100453 = sum of:
            0.04100453 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04100453 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  17. Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008) 0.01
    0.010072953 = product of:
      0.020145906 = sum of:
        0.020145906 = product of:
          0.040291812 = sum of:
            0.040291812 = weight(_text_:web in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040291812 = score(doc=213,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Rafael Capurro: Einleitung Klaus Wiegerling: Ubiquitous Computing als konkrete Utopie Michael Nagenborg: Wenn Roboter alles wissen und Kühlschränke nicht lügen Tassilo Pellegrini: Semantic Web als konkrete Utopie - Eine praktische Annäherung Falko Blask: TV kontra Web: Mythos Medien - Medienmythen Hans Kräh: Filme als Zeitreisen: Medienszenarien in Zukunftsszenarien Uwe Jochum: Zur Zeit wird hier der Raum - Die digitale Inversion des Karfreitagszaubers Thomas Nisslmüller: Der cybergnostische Imperativ: Sich lesen in Zeiten virtueller Versuchsspiele Manfred Lang: Good Night, and Good Luck! Zur Geschichte informationspolitischer Utopien
  18. Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.01
    0.008903317 = product of:
      0.017806634 = sum of:
        0.017806634 = product of:
          0.03561327 = sum of:
            0.03561327 = weight(_text_:web in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03561327 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
  19. Bagatini, J.A.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: Algorithmic discriminations and their ethical impacts on knowledge organization : a thematic domain-analysis (2023) 0.01
    0.008903317 = product of:
      0.017806634 = sum of:
        0.017806634 = product of:
          0.03561327 = sum of:
            0.03561327 = weight(_text_:web in 1134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03561327 = score(doc=1134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Personal data play a fundamental role in contemporary socioeconomic dynamics, with one of its primary aspects being the potential to facilitate discriminatory situations. This situation impacts the knowledge organization field especially because it considers personal data as elements (facets) to categorize persons under an economic and sometimes discriminatory perspective. The research corpus was collected at Scopus and Web of Science until the end of 2021, under the terms "data discrimination", "algorithmic bias", "algorithmic discrimination" and "fair algorithms". The obtained results allowed to infer that the analyzed knowledge domain predominantly incorporates personal data, whether in its behavioral dimension or in the scope of the so-called sensitive data. These data are susceptible to the action of algorithms of different orders, such as relevance, filtering, predictive, social ranking, content recommendation and random classification. Such algorithms can have discriminatory biases in their programming related to gender, sexual orientation, race, nationality, religion, age, social class, socioeconomic profile, physical appearance, and political positioning.
  20. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.01
    0.007248645 = product of:
      0.01449729 = sum of:
        0.01449729 = product of:
          0.02899458 = sum of:
            0.02899458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02899458 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060529456 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)

Years

Languages

Types