Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0026079838 = product of:
  0.018255886 = sum of:
    0.018255886 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018255886 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Controversy is a complex concept that has been attracting attention of scholars from diverse fields. In the era of Internet and social media, detecting controversy and controversial concepts by the means of automatic methods is especially important. Web searchers could be alerted when the contents they consume are controversial or when they attempt to acquire information on disputed topics. Presenting users with the indications and explanations of the controversy should offer them chance to see the "wider picture" rather than letting them obtain one-sided views. In this work we first introduce a formal model of controversy as the basis of computational approaches to detecting controversial concepts. Then we propose a classification based method for automatic detection of controversial articles and categories in Wikipedia. Next, we demonstrate how to use the obtained results for the estimation of the controversy level of search queries. The proposed method can be incorporated into search engines as a component responsible for detection of queries related to controversial topics. The method is independent of the search engine's retrieval and search results recommendation algorithms, and is therefore unaffected by a possible filter bubble. Our approach can be also applied in Wikipedia or other knowledge bases for supporting the detection of controversy and content maintenance. Finally, we believe that our results could be useful for social science researchers for understanding the complex nature of controversy and in fostering their studies.

0.0013980685 = product of:
  0.009786479 = sum of:
    0.009786479 = product of:
      0.029359438 = sum of:
        0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359438 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.0013980685 = product of:
  0.009786479 = sum of:
    0.009786479 = product of:
      0.029359438 = sum of:
        0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359438 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

18.11.2014 13:22:03

0.0011756329 = product of:
  0.00822943 = sum of:
    0.00822943 = product of:
      0.024688289 = sum of:
        0.024688289 = weight(_text_:29 in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024688289 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

16. 3.2019 17:29:12

8.238198E-4 = product of:
  0.005766738 = sum of:
    0.005766738 = product of:
      0.017300215 = sum of:
        0.017300215 = weight(_text_:22 in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017300215 = score(doc=2171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

Der neue Herausgeber des Brockhaus, ein Tochterverlag von Bertelsmann, hat unterdessen angekündigt, zum gedruckten Lexikon zurückzukehren. Etwa Anfang 2015 soll die 22. Auflage erscheinen. In Zeiten des virtuellen Informationsoverkills gebe es einen Bedarf an Orientierung, an Relevanzvorgaben, sagt Geschäftsführer Christoph Hünermann. Ausgerechnet Bertelsmann druckte 2008 ein knapp 1 000 Seiten langes Wikipedia-Lexikon mit den 50 000 meist gesuchten Begriffen. Eine Experten-Redaktion überprüfte die Einträge sicherheitshalber zuvor - soll allerdings kaum Fehler gefunden haben."

Source

Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.76 vom 29.3.2012, S.22-23