Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bhavnani, S.K.; Peck, F.A.: Scatter matters : regularities and implications for the scatter of healthcare information on the Web (2010) 0.01
    0.010056066 = product of:
      0.07039246 = sum of:
        0.051248677 = weight(_text_:web in 3433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051248677 = score(doc=3433,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 3433, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3433)
        0.019143783 = weight(_text_:information in 3433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019143783 = score(doc=3433,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 3433, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3433)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the development of huge healthcare Web sites and powerful search engines, many searchers end their searches prematurely with incomplete information. Recent studies suggest that users often retrieve incomplete information because of the complex scatter of relevant facts about a topic across Web pages. However, little is understood about regularities underlying such information scatter. To probe regularities within the scatter of facts across Web pages, this article presents the results of two analyses: (a) a cluster analysis of Web pages that reveals the existence of three page clusters that vary in information density and (b) a content analysis that suggests the role each of the above-mentioned page clusters play in providing comprehensive information. These results provide implications for the design of Web sites, search tools, and training to help users find comprehensive information about a topic and for a hypothesis describing the underlying mechanisms causing the scatter. We conclude by briefly discussing how the analysis of information scatter, at the granularity of facts, complements existing theories of information-seeking behavior.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.659-676
  2. Zielinski, K.; Nielek, R.; Wierzbicki, A.; Jatowt, A.: Computing controversy : formal model and algorithms for detecting controversy on Wikipedia and in search queries (2018) 0.01
    0.008474699 = product of:
      0.039548595 = sum of:
        0.017435152 = weight(_text_:web in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017435152 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=5093,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014978974 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Controversy is a complex concept that has been attracting attention of scholars from diverse fields. In the era of Internet and social media, detecting controversy and controversial concepts by the means of automatic methods is especially important. Web searchers could be alerted when the contents they consume are controversial or when they attempt to acquire information on disputed topics. Presenting users with the indications and explanations of the controversy should offer them chance to see the "wider picture" rather than letting them obtain one-sided views. In this work we first introduce a formal model of controversy as the basis of computational approaches to detecting controversial concepts. Then we propose a classification based method for automatic detection of controversial articles and categories in Wikipedia. Next, we demonstrate how to use the obtained results for the estimation of the controversy level of search queries. The proposed method can be incorporated into search engines as a component responsible for detection of queries related to controversial topics. The method is independent of the search engine's retrieval and search results recommendation algorithms, and is therefore unaffected by a possible filter bubble. Our approach can be also applied in Wikipedia or other knowledge bases for supporting the detection of controversy and content maintenance. Finally, we believe that our results could be useful for social science researchers for understanding the complex nature of controversy and in fostering their studies.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.1, S.14-36
  3. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.00
    0.002645043 = product of:
      0.0185153 = sum of:
        0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0104854815 = score(doc=1540,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
        0.008029819 = product of:
          0.024089456 = sum of:
            0.024089456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024089456 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2381-2403
  4. Sharma, N.; Butler, B.S.; Irwin, J.; Spallek, H.: Emphasizing social features in information portals : effects on new member engagement (2011) 0.00
    9.5338316E-4 = product of:
      0.013347364 = sum of:
        0.013347364 = weight(_text_:information in 4916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013347364 = score(doc=4916,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 4916, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4916)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Many information portals are adding social features with hopes of enhancing the overall user experience. Invitations to join and welcome pages that highlight these social features are expected to encourage use and participation. While this approach is widespread and seems plausible, the effect of providing and highlighting social features remains to be tested. We studied the effects of emphasizing social features on users' response to invitations, their decisions to join, their willingness to provide profile information, and their engagement with the portal's social features. The results of a quasi-experiment found no significant effect of social emphasis in invitations on receivers' responsiveness. However, users receiving invitations highlighting social benefits were less likely to join the portal and provide profile information. Social emphasis in the initial welcome page for the site also was found to have a significant effect on whether individuals joined the portal, how much profile information they provided and shared, and how much they engaged with social features on the site. Unexpectedly, users who were welcomed in a social manner were less likely to join and provided less profile information; they also were less likely to engage with social features of the portal. This suggests that even in online contexts where social activity is an increasingly common feature, highlighting the presence of social features may not always be the optimal presentation strategy.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2106-2120
  5. Luyt, B.; Ally, Y.; Low, N.H.; Ismail, N.B.: Librarian perception of Wikipedia : threats or opportunities for librarianship? (2010) 0.00
    8.826613E-4 = product of:
      0.012357258 = sum of:
        0.012357258 = weight(_text_:information in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012357258 = score(doc=5076,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The rapid rise of Wikipedia as an information source has placed the traditional role of librarians as information gatekeepers and guardians under scrutiny with much of the professional literature suggesting that librarians are polarized over the issue of whether Wikipedia is a useful reference tool. This qualitative study examines the perceptions and behaviours of National Library Board (NLB) of Singapore librarians with regards to information seeking and usage of Wikipedia. It finds that instead of polarized attitudes, most librarians, although cautious about using Wikipedia in their professional capacity, hold a range of generally positive attitudes towards the online encyclopaedia, believing that it has a valid role to play in the information seeking of patrons today. This is heartening because it suggests the existence within the librarian population of attitudes that can be tapped to engage constructively with Wikipedia. Three of these in particular are briefly discussed at the end of the article: Wikipedia's ability to appeal to the socalled "digital natives," its role as a source of non-Western information, and its potential to enable a revitalization of the role of librarians as public intellectuals contributing to a democratic information commons.
  6. Hesse, W.: ¬Die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wikipedia : Und was Bibliotheken dazu beitragen können (2018) 0.00
    7.134467E-4 = product of:
      0.009988253 = sum of:
        0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 4586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009988253 = score(doc=4586,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4586, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4586)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die Wikipedia ist sowohl hinsichtlich ihres Umfangs als auch hinsichtlich ihrer Nutzung die heute bedeutendste Enzyklopädie. Auch innerhalb der Wissenschaft spielt sie, vor allem als leicht zugänglicher Rechercheeinstieg, eine wichtige Rolle. In diesem Zusammenhang steht die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wikipedia immer wieder im Fokus, da ihre Inhalte nicht durch Fachexperten kontrolliert, sondern von jedermann ediert werden können. Jedoch ist innerhalb der Wikipediacommunity ein starkes Bemühen um Glaubwürdigkeit festzustellen. Anhand der Analyse ausgewählter Redaktionsprinzipien der Wikipedia und der Auswertung einer Fallstudie zur Erzeugung von Glaubwürdigkeit in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia lassen sich Implikationen für Information Professionals ableiten. Besonders Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare können durch ihren Zugang zu Literatur einerseits und mit ihren Recherchekenntnissen andererseits dabei helfen, die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wikipedia zu steigern.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 69(2018) H.4, S.171-181
  7. Teplitskiy, M.; Lu, G.; Duede, E.: Amplifying the impact of open access : Wikipedia and the diffusion of science (2017) 0.00
    6.115257E-4 = product of:
      0.00856136 = sum of:
        0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 3782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00856136 = score(doc=3782,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3782, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3782)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    With the rise of Wikipedia as a first-stop source for scientific information, it is important to understand whether Wikipedia draws upon the research that scientists value most. Here we identify the 250 most heavily used journals in each of 26 research fields (4,721 journals, 19.4M articles) indexed by the Scopus database, and test whether topic, academic status, and accessibility make articles from these journals more or less likely to be referenced on Wikipedia. We find that a journal's academic status (impact factor) and accessibility (open access policy) both strongly increase the probability of it being referenced on Wikipedia. Controlling for field and impact factor, the odds that an open access journal is referenced on the English Wikipedia are 47% higher compared to paywall journals. These findings provide evidence is that a major consequence of open access policies is to significantly amplify the diffusion of science, through an intermediary like Wikipedia, to a broad audience.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2116-2127
  8. Nowag, B.: Query by Humming : ein Vergleich von Suchmaschinen zur Melodie-Erkennung (2010) 0.00
    5.7655195E-4 = product of:
      0.008071727 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 3506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=3506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3506)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.2, S.111-115
  9. Hartmann, B.: Ab ins MoMA : zum virtuellen Museumsgang (2011) 0.00
    5.735585E-4 = product of:
      0.008029819 = sum of:
        0.008029819 = product of:
          0.024089456 = sum of:
            0.024089456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024089456 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  10. Mesgari, M.; Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: ¬"The sum of all human knowledge" : a systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia (2015) 0.00
    5.0960475E-4 = product of:
      0.0071344664 = sum of:
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=1624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.219-245
  11. Franz, G.: Interlingualer Wissensaustausch in der Wikipedia : Warum das Projekt noch kein (Welt-)Erfolg ist und von Möglichkeiten dies zu ändernStrategien im Angesicht der Globalisierung (2011) 0.00
    5.04483E-4 = product of:
      0.0070627616 = sum of:
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.4, S.183-190
  12. Tsikerdekis, M.: Personal communication networks and their positive effects on online collaboration and outcome quality on Wikipedia : an empirical exploration (2016) 0.00
    3.6034497E-4 = product of:
      0.0050448296 = sum of:
        0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 2846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050448296 = score(doc=2846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2846)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.812-823
  13. Höhn, S.: Stalins Badezimmer in Wikipedia : Die Macher der Internet-Enzyklopädie diskutieren über Verantwortung und Transparenz. Der Brockhaus kehrt dagegen zur gedruckten Ausgabe zurück. (2012) 0.00
    3.379726E-4 = product of:
      0.004731616 = sum of:
        0.004731616 = product of:
          0.014194848 = sum of:
            0.014194848 = weight(_text_:22 in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014194848 = score(doc=2171,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Der neue Herausgeber des Brockhaus, ein Tochterverlag von Bertelsmann, hat unterdessen angekündigt, zum gedruckten Lexikon zurückzukehren. Etwa Anfang 2015 soll die 22. Auflage erscheinen. In Zeiten des virtuellen Informationsoverkills gebe es einen Bedarf an Orientierung, an Relevanzvorgaben, sagt Geschäftsführer Christoph Hünermann. Ausgerechnet Bertelsmann druckte 2008 ein knapp 1 000 Seiten langes Wikipedia-Lexikon mit den 50 000 meist gesuchten Begriffen. Eine Experten-Redaktion überprüfte die Einträge sicherheitshalber zuvor - soll allerdings kaum Fehler gefunden haben."
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.76 vom 29.3.2012, S.22-23