Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.03 
    0.03485186 = product of:
  0.11617286 = sum of:
    0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018210711 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018210711 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.030206721 = weight(_text_:der in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030206721 = score(doc=77,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018210711 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018210711 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.013123296 = product of:
      0.026246592 = sum of:
        0.026246592 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026246592 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Die Webometrie ist ein Teilbereich der Informationswissenschaft der zur Zeit auf die Analyse von Linkstrukturen konzentriert ist. Er ist stark von der Zitationsanalyse geprägt, wie der empirische Schwerpunkt auf der Wissenschaftsanalyse zeigt. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Nutzung linkbasierter Maße in einem breiten informetrischen Kontext und bewerten verschiedene Verfahren, auch im Hinblick auf ihr generelles Potentialfür die Sozialwissenschaften. Dabei wird auch ein allgemeiner Rahmenfür Linkanalysen mit den erforderlichen Arbeitsschritten vorgestellt. Abschließend werden vielversprechende zukünftige Anwendungsfelder der Webometrie benannt, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analyse von Blogs.
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  2. Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005) 0.03 
    0.026149925 = product of:
  0.17433283 = sum of:
    0.05811094 = weight(_text_:biologie in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05811094 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.36410153 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
    0.05811094 = weight(_text_:biologie in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05811094 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.36410153 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
    0.05811094 = weight(_text_:biologie in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05811094 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.36410153 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Field
    Biologie
  3. Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006) 0.02 
    0.023697838 = product of:
  0.09479135 = sum of:
    0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021027917 = score(doc=78,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
    0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021027917 = score(doc=78,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
    0.010679688 = weight(_text_:der in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010679688 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
    0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021027917 = score(doc=78,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
    0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021027917 = score(doc=78,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird eine webometrische Untersuchung vorgestellt, die informationswissenschaftliche Hochschulinstitute in den deutschsprachigen Ländern zum Gegenstand hatte. Ziel dieser Studie war es, einerseits die Linkbeziehungen zwischen den Hochschulinstituten zu analysieren. Andererseits sollten Ähnlichkeiten (zum Beispiel aufgrund von fachlichen, örtlichen oder institutionellen Gegebenheiten) identifiziert werden. Es werden nicht nur die Vorgehensweise bei derartigen Analysen und die daraus resultierenden Ergebnisse dargestellt. Insbesondere sollen Problembereiche und Einschränkungen, die mit der Analyse von Linkstrukturen im Web verbunden sind, thematisiert werden.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.407-414
  4. fwt: Webseiten liegen im Schnitt nur 19 Klicks auseinander (2001) 0.01 
    0.012363065 = product of:
  0.04945226 = sum of:
    0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007885469 = score(doc=5962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
    0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007885469 = score(doc=5962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
    0.017910382 = weight(_text_:der in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017910382 = score(doc=5962,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
    0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007885469 = score(doc=5962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
    0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007885469 = score(doc=5962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    "Dokumente im World Wide Web liegen durchschnittlich 19 Mausklicks voneinander entfernt - angesichts von schätzungsweise mehr als einer Milliarde Seiten erstaunlich nahe. Albert-Lazlo Barabai vom Institut für Physik der University von Notre Dame (US-Staat Indiana) stellt seine Studie in der britischen Fachzeitschrift Physics World (Juli 2001, S. 33) vor. Der Statistiker konstruierte im Rechner zunächst Modelle von großen Computernetzwerken. Grundlage für diese Abbilder war die Analyse eines kleinen Teils der Verbindungen im Web, die der Wissenschaftler automatisch von einem Programm hatte prüfen lassen. Um seine Ergebnisse zu erklären, vergleicht Barabai das World Wide Web mit den Verbindungen internationaler Fluglinien. Dort gebe es zahlreiche Flughäfen, die meist nur mit anderen Flugplätzen in ihrer näheren Umgebung in Verbindung stünden. Diese kleineren Verteiler stehen ihrerseits mit einigen wenigen großen Airports wie Frankfurt, New York oder Hongkong in Verbindung. Ähnlich sei es im Netz, wo wenige große Server die Verteilung großer Datenmengen übernähmen und weite Entfernungen überbrückten. Damit seien die Online-Wege vergleichsweise kurz. Die Untersuchung spiegelt allerdings die Situation des Jahres 1999 wider. Seinerzeit gab es vermutlich 800 Millionen Knoten."
  5. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.00 
    4.921236E-4 = product of:
  0.009842472 = sum of:
    0.009842472 = product of:
      0.019684944 = sum of:
        0.019684944 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019684944 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11

Authors

Languages