-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.07
0.07443855 = product of:
0.11165782 = sum of:
0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09099667 = score(doc=6389,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.020661155 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132231 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Yang, S.; Han, R.; Ding, J.; Song, Y.: ¬The distribution of Web citations (2012)
0.02
0.02144812 = product of:
0.06434436 = sum of:
0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434436 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A substantial amount of research has focused on the persistence or availability of Web citations. The present study analyzes Web citation distributions. Web citations are defined as the mentions of the URLs of Web pages (Web resources) as references in academic papers. The present paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the URLs of Web citations and uses three sets of data, namely, Set 1 from the Humanities and Social Science Index in China (CSSCI, 1998-2009), Set 2 from the publications of two international computer science societies, Communications of the ACM and IEEE Computer (1995-1999), and Set 3 from the medical science database, MEDLINE, of the National Library of Medicine (1994-2006). Web citation distributions are investigated based on Web site types, Web page types, URL frequencies, URL depths, URL lengths, and year of article publication. Results show significant differences in the Web citation distributions among the three data sets. However, when the URLs of Web citations with the same hostnames are aggregated, the distributions in the three data sets are consistent with the power law (the Lotka function).
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003)
0.02
0.017873434 = product of:
0.0536203 = sum of:
0.0536203 = weight(_text_:index in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0536203 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.009182736 = product of:
0.027548207 = sum of:
0.027548207 = product of:
0.055096414 = sum of:
0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055096414 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.01
0.008116469 = product of:
0.024349404 = sum of:
0.024349404 = product of:
0.04869881 = sum of:
0.04869881 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04869881 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.01
0.008034894 = product of:
0.02410468 = sum of:
0.02410468 = product of:
0.04820936 = sum of:
0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04820936 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.01
0.0068870517 = product of:
0.020661155 = sum of:
0.020661155 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132231 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
