Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Larson, R.R.: Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web : an exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace (1996) 0.05
    0.046869807 = product of:
      0.14060941 = sum of:
        0.067437425 = weight(_text_:wide in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067437425 = score(doc=7334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
        0.073171996 = weight(_text_:web in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073171996 = score(doc=7334,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the explosive growth and the bibliometrics of the WWW based on both analysis of over 30 GBytes of WWW pages collected by the Inktomi Web Crawler and on the use of the DEC AltaVista search engine for cocitation analysis of a set of Earth Science related WWW sites. Examines the statistical characteristics of web documents and their links, and the characteristics of highly cited web documents
  2. Almind, T.C.; Ingwersen, P.: Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web : methodological approaches to 'Webometrics' (1997) 0.03
    0.034674477 = product of:
      0.10402343 = sum of:
        0.067437425 = weight(_text_:wide in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067437425 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
        0.036585998 = weight(_text_:web in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036585998 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  3. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.03
    0.025285622 = product of:
      0.075856864 = sum of:
        0.057803504 = weight(_text_:wide in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057803504 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19679762 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
        0.01805336 = product of:
          0.03610672 = sum of:
            0.03610672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610672 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  4. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.02
    0.019216085 = product of:
      0.057648253 = sum of:
        0.036585998 = weight(_text_:web in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036585998 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.021062255 = product of:
          0.04212451 = sum of:
            0.04212451 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04212451 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  5. Ingwersen, P.: ¬The calculation of Web impact factors (1998) 0.02
    0.018292997 = product of:
      0.10975798 = sum of:
        0.10975798 = weight(_text_:web in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10975798 = score(doc=1071,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.75719774 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports investigations into the feasibility and reliability of calculating impact factors for web sites, called Web Impact Factors (Web-IF). analyzes a selection of 7 small and medium scale national and 4 large web domains as well as 6 institutional web sites over a series of snapshots taken of the web during a month. Describes the data isolation and calculation methods and discusses the tests. The results thus far demonstrate that Web-IFs are calculable with high confidence for national and sector domains whilst institutional Web-IFs should be approached with caution
  6. Bucy, E.P.; Lang, A.; Potter, R.F.; Grabe, M.E.: Formal features of cyberspace : relationships between Web page complexity and site traffic (1999) 0.01
    0.010668693 = product of:
      0.064012155 = sum of:
        0.064012155 = weight(_text_:web in 4060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064012155 = score(doc=4060,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 4060, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4060)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Although the Internet is not without its critics, many popular and academic writers are particular effusive in the praise of the WWW's interactive features. A content analysis of the formal features of 496 Web sites, drawn randomly from a sample of the top 5.000 most visited sites determined by 100hot.com, was performed to explore whether the capabilities of the WWW are being exploited by Web page designers to the extent that the literature suggests they are. Specifically, the study examines the differences between the formal features of commercial versus non-commercial sites as well as the relationship between Web page complexity and the amount of traffic a site receives. Findings indicate that, although most pages in this stage of the Web's development remain technological simple and noninteractive, there are significant relationships between site traffic and home-page structure for Web sites in the commercial (.com) as well as educational (.edu) domains. As the Web continues to expand and the amount of information redundancy increases, it is argued that a site's information packaging will become increasingly important in gaining users' attention and interest
  7. Youngen, G.K.: Citation patterns to traditional and electronic preprints in the published literature (1998) 0.01
    0.0052265706 = product of:
      0.031359423 = sum of:
        0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 3360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031359423 = score(doc=3360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3360)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The number of physics and astronomy preprints (manuscripts intended for publication but circulated for peer comment prior to submission) available electronically has increased dramatically over the past 5 years and Internet accessible preprint Web servers at the Stanford Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) and the Los Alamos National Laboratoty (LANL) provide unrestricted access to citations and full text of many of these papers long before they appear in print. Includes data for periodicals ranked by number of citations to preprints and electronic preprints (e-prints). Identifies the growing importance of e-prints in the published literature and addresses areas of concern regarding their future role in scientific communication, including: inclusion of e-prints in abstracting and indexing services; connecting electronic periodicals with e-prints; guidelines for withdrawal and revision of e-prints; and maintaining the integritiy of the e-print servers
  8. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.00
    0.0035460151 = product of:
      0.02127609 = sum of:
        0.02127609 = product of:
          0.04255218 = sum of:
            0.04255218 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04255218 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044416238 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22