-
Teplitskiy, M.; Lu, G.; Duede, E.: Amplifying the impact of open access : Wikipedia and the diffusion of science (2017)
0.00
0.0022284468 = product of:
0.0044568935 = sum of:
0.0044568935 = product of:
0.008913787 = sum of:
0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 3782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008913787 = score(doc=3782,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3782, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3782)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.: ¬A comparison of link and URL citation counting (2011)
0.00
0.0018570389 = product of:
0.0037140779 = sum of:
0.0037140779 = product of:
0.0074281557 = sum of:
0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 4533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074281557 = score(doc=4533,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4533, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Link analysis is an established topic within webometrics. It normally uses counts of links between sets of web sites or to sets of web sites. These link counts are derived from web crawlers or commercial search engines with the latter being the only alternative for some investigations. This paper compares link counts with URL citation counts in order to assess whether the latter could be a replacement for the former if the major search engines withdraw their advanced hyperlink search facilities. Design/methodology/approach - URL citation counts are compared with link counts for a variety of data sets used in previous webometric studies. Findings - The results show a high degree of correlation between the two but with URL citations being much less numerous, at least outside academia and business. Research limitations/implications - The results cover a small selection of 15 case studies and so the findings are only indicative. Significant differences between results indicate that the difference between link counts and URL citation counts will vary between webometric studies. Practical implications - Should link searches be withdrawn, then link analyses of less well linked non-academic, non-commercial sites would be seriously weakened, although citations based on e-mail addresses could help to make citations more numerous than links for some business and academic contexts. Originality/value - This is the first systematic study of the difference between link counts and URL citation counts in a variety of contexts and it shows that there are significant differences between the two.
- Language
- e
-
Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014)
0.00
0.0015920794 = product of:
0.0031841588 = sum of:
0.0031841588 = product of:
0.0063683176 = sum of:
0.0063683176 = weight(_text_:e in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0063683176 = score(doc=2274,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.096272506 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Classification
- AZC (E)
- GHBS
- AZC (E)
- Language
- e
-
Simkin, M.V.; Roychowdhury, V.P.: Why does attention to web articles fall with Time? (2015)
0.00
0.0015757497 = product of:
0.0031514994 = sum of:
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Yang, S.; Han, R.; Ding, J.; Song, Y.: ¬The distribution of Web citations (2012)
0.00
0.0015757497 = product of:
0.0031514994 = sum of:
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017)
0.00
0.0015757497 = product of:
0.0031514994 = sum of:
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: ¬A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations (2011)
0.00
0.0013131249 = product of:
0.0026262498 = sum of:
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
