-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.04
0.03505398 = product of:
0.08763495 = sum of:
0.07611368 = weight(_text_:index in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07611368 = score(doc=6389,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.01
0.010801995 = product of:
0.054009974 = sum of:
0.054009974 = product of:
0.08101496 = sum of:
0.0406905 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0406905 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04032446 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
- Source
- Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
-
Yang, S.; Han, R.; Ding, J.; Song, Y.: ¬The distribution of Web citations (2012)
0.01
0.0107641 = product of:
0.0538205 = sum of:
0.0538205 = weight(_text_:index in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0538205 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- A substantial amount of research has focused on the persistence or availability of Web citations. The present study analyzes Web citation distributions. Web citations are defined as the mentions of the URLs of Web pages (Web resources) as references in academic papers. The present paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the URLs of Web citations and uses three sets of data, namely, Set 1 from the Humanities and Social Science Index in China (CSSCI, 1998-2009), Set 2 from the publications of two international computer science societies, Communications of the ACM and IEEE Computer (1995-1999), and Set 3 from the medical science database, MEDLINE, of the National Library of Medicine (1994-2006). Web citation distributions are investigated based on Web site types, Web page types, URL frequencies, URL depths, URL lengths, and year of article publication. Results show significant differences in the Web citation distributions among the three data sets. However, when the URLs of Web citations with the same hostnames are aggregated, the distributions in the three data sets are consistent with the power law (the Lotka function).
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The Web as an information source on informetrics? : A content analysis (2000)
0.01
0.009683615 = product of:
0.04841807 = sum of:
0.04841807 = weight(_text_:context in 4587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04841807 = score(doc=4587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27475408 = fieldWeight in 4587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4587)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This article addresses the question of whether the Web can serve as an information source for research. Specifically, it analyzes by way of content analysis the Web pages retrieved by the major search engines on a particular date (June 7, 1998), as a result of the query 'informetrics OR informetric'. In 807 out of the 942 retrieved pages, the search terms were mentioned in the context of information science. Over 70% of the pages contained only indirect information on the topic, in the form of hypertext links and bibliographical references without annotation. The bibliographical references extracted from the Web pages were analyzed, and lists of most productive authors, most cited authors, works, and sources were compiled. The list of reference obtained from the Web was also compared to data retrieved from commercial databases. For most cases, the list of references extracted from the Web outperformed the commercial, bibliographic databases. The results of these comparisons indicate that valuable, freely available data is hidden in the Web waiting to be extracted from the millions of Web pages
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003)
0.01
0.008970084 = product of:
0.044850416 = sum of:
0.044850416 = weight(_text_:index in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044850416 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
-
Amitay, E.; Carmel, D.; Herscovici, M.; Lempel, R.; Soffer, A.: Trend detection through temporal link analysis (2004)
0.01
0.008069678 = product of:
0.040348392 = sum of:
0.040348392 = weight(_text_:context in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040348392 = score(doc=3092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.22896172 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Although time has been recognized as an important dimension in the co-citation literature, to date it has not been incorporated into the analogous process of link analysis an the Web. In this paper, we discuss several aspects and uses of the time dimension in the context of Web information retrieval. We describe the ideal casewhere search engines track and store temporal data for each of the pages in their repository, assigning timestamps to the hyperlinks embedded within the pages. We introduce several applications which benefit from the availability of such timestamps. To demonstrate our claims, we use a somewhat simplistic approach, which dates links by approximating the age of the page's content. We show that by using this crude measure alone it is possible to detect and expose significant events and trends. We predict that by using more robust methods for tracking modifications in the content of pages, search engines will be able to provide results that are more timely and better reflect current real-life trends than those they provide today.
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017)
0.01
0.007908144 = product of:
0.03954072 = sum of:
0.03954072 = weight(_text_:system in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03954072 = score(doc=3781,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Social media has become integrated into the fabric of the scholarly communication system in fundamental ways, principally through scholarly use of social media platforms and the promotion of new indicators on the basis of interactions with these platforms. Research and scholarship in this area has accelerated since the coining and subsequent advocacy for altmetrics-that is, research indicators based on social media activity. This review provides an extensive account of the state-of-the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics. The review consists of 2 main parts: the first examines the use of social media in academia, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use. The second part reviews empirical studies of altmetrics, discussing the various interpretations of altmetrics, data collection and methodological limitations, and differences according to platform. The review ends with a critical discussion of the implications of this transformation in the scholarly communication system.
-
Kaminer, N.; Braunstein, Y.M.: Bibliometric analysis of the impact of Internet use on scholarly productivity (1998)
0.01
0.00745587 = product of:
0.03727935 = sum of:
0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03727935 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Variables measuring the nature and level of Internet usage by natural scientists improve the explanatory power of a traditional bibliographic model of scholarly productivity. The data used to construct these variables come from log files generated by the internal accounting modules of the UNIX operating system. The effects of Internet usage on productivity are quntifiable, and it is possible to calculate tradeoffs between Internet usage and the more traditional inputs
-
Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014)
0.01
0.005648775 = product of:
0.028243875 = sum of:
0.028243875 = weight(_text_:context in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028243875 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.16027321 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- 1. Introduction. MetricsIndicators -- Web metrics and Ranganathan's laws of library science -- Web metrics for the library and information professional -- The aim of this book -- The structure of the rest of this book -- 2. Bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics. Web metrics -- Information science metrics -- Web analytics -- Relational and evaluative metrics -- Evaluative web metrics -- Relational web metrics -- Validating the results -- 3. Data collection tools. The anatomy of a URL, web links and the structure of the web -- Search engines 1.0 -- Web crawlers -- Search engines 2.0 -- Post search engine 2.0: fragmentation -- 4. Evaluating impact on the web. Websites -- Blogs -- Wikis -- Internal metrics -- External metrics -- A systematic approach to content analysis -- 5. Evaluating social media impact. Aspects of social network sites -- Typology of social network sites -- Research and tools for specific sites and services -- Other social network sites -- URL shorteners: web analytic links on any site -- General social media impact -- Sentiment analysis -- 6. Investigating relationships between actors. Social network analysis methods -- Sources for relational network analysis -- 7. Exploring traditional publications in a new environment. More bibliographic items -- Full text analysis -- Greater context -- 8. Web metrics and the web of data. The web of data -- Building the semantic web -- Implications of the web of data for web metrics -- Investigating the web of data today -- SPARQL -- Sindice -- LDSpider: an RDF web crawler -- 9. The future of web metrics and the library and information professional. How far we have come -- The future of web metrics -- The future of the library and information professional and web metrics.
-
Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006)
0.00
0.0031002287 = product of:
0.015501143 = sum of:
0.015501143 = product of:
0.04650343 = sum of:
0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04650343 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:14:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.00
0.0030723398 = product of:
0.015361699 = sum of:
0.015361699 = product of:
0.046085097 = sum of:
0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046085097 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.00
0.0027155904 = product of:
0.013577952 = sum of:
0.013577952 = product of:
0.040733855 = sum of:
0.040733855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040733855 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001)
0.00
0.0023251716 = product of:
0.011625858 = sum of:
0.011625858 = product of:
0.034877572 = sum of:
0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877572 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:09
-
Menczer, F.: Lexical and semantic clustering by Web links (2004)
0.00
0.0023251716 = product of:
0.011625858 = sum of:
0.011625858 = product of:
0.034877572 = sum of:
0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877572 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 1.2005 19:20:29
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.00
0.0023042548 = product of:
0.011521274 = sum of:
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003)
0.00
0.001937643 = product of:
0.009688215 = sum of:
0.009688215 = product of:
0.029064644 = sum of:
0.029064644 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029064644 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
-
Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002)
0.00
0.001937643 = product of:
0.009688215 = sum of:
0.009688215 = product of:
0.029064644 = sum of:
0.029064644 = weight(_text_:29 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029064644 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
