Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Sellen, M.K.: Bibliometrics : an annotated bibliography 1970-1990 (1993) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library quarterly. 64(1994) no.3, S.357-358 (B.C. Peritz)
  2. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.00
    0.0014873719 = product of:
      0.008924231 = sum of:
        0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008924231 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of models of the process of scholarly communication and the role that bibliometrics can play in studying this process
  3. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996) 0.00
    0.0011898974 = product of:
      0.0071393843 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Part 2 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Reports on studies of author co-citation, periodical by periodical citation analysis and country by country citation analysis in addition to the mapping of science as an application of citation analysis. Considers the limitations, problems and reliability of citation analysis
  4. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996) 0.00
    0.0011898974 = product of:
      0.0071393843 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Traces the history and development of bibliometrics, including its definition, scope, role in scholarly communication and applications. Treats citation analysis similarly with particular reference to bibliographic coupling and cocitation coupling

Types