Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.0070920303 = product of:
  0.04255218 = sum of:
    0.04255218 = product of:
      0.08510436 = sum of:
        0.08510436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08510436 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  2. Harzing, A.-W.: Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI Journal Impact Factor (2008) 0.01 
    0.0060976665 = product of:
  0.036585998 = sum of:
    0.036585998 = weight(_text_:web in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036585998 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Object
    Web of Science
  3. Williams, B.: Dimensions & VOSViewer bibliometrics in the reference interview (2020) 0.01 
    0.0060976665 = product of:
  0.036585998 = sum of:
    0.036585998 = weight(_text_:web in 5719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036585998 = score(doc=5719,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5719, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5719)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The VOSviewer software provides easy access to bibliometric mapping using data from Dimensions, Scopus and Web of Science. The properly formatted and structured citation data, and the ease in which it can be exported open up new avenues for use during citation searches and eference interviews. This paper details specific techniques for using advanced searches in Dimensions, exporting the citation data, and drawing insights from the maps produced in VOS Viewer. These search techniques and data export practices are fast and accurate enough to build into reference interviews for graduate students, faculty, and post-PhD researchers. The search results derived from them are accurate and allow a more comprehensive view of citation networks embedded in ordinary complex boolean searches.
  4. Braun, S.: Manifold: a custom analytics platform to visualize research impact (2015) 0.01 
    0.0052265706 = product of:
  0.031359423 = sum of:
    0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 2906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031359423 = score(doc=2906,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2906, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2906)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The use of research impact metrics and analytics has become an integral component to many aspects of institutional assessment. Many platforms currently exist to provide such analytics, both proprietary and open source; however, the functionality of these systems may not always overlap to serve uniquely specific needs. In this paper, I describe a novel web-based platform, named Manifold, that I built to serve custom research impact assessment needs in the University of Minnesota Medical School. Built on a standard LAMP architecture, Manifold automatically pulls publication data for faculty from Scopus through APIs, calculates impact metrics through automated analytics, and dynamically generates report-like profiles that visualize those metrics. Work on this project has resulted in many lessons learned about challenges to sustainability and scalability in developing a system of such magnitude.

Authors

Years

Themes