-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.08
0.07523338 = product of:
0.22570013 = sum of:
0.22570013 = sum of:
0.171608 = weight(_text_:demand in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.171608 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.5513048 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- International bibliographic databases and related biblimetric indicators together provide an analytical framework and appropriate measure to cover both the 'supply side' - research capabilities and outputs - and 'demand side' - collaboration, diffusion and citation impact - related to information and communication technologies (ICT) research. Presents results of such a bibliometric study describing macro level features of this ICT knowledge base
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
-
Hudnut, S.K.: Finding answers by the numbers : statistical analysis of online search results (1993)
0.06
0.06424023 = product of:
0.09636035 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=555,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
0.064353004 = product of:
0.12870601 = sum of:
0.12870601 = weight(_text_:demand in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12870601 = score(doc=555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.4134786 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Online searchers today no longer limit themselves to locating references to articles. More and more, they are called upon to locate specific answers to questions such as: Who is my chief competitor for this technology? Who is publishing the most on this subject? What is the geographic distribution of this product? These questions demand answers, not necessarily from record content, but from statistical analysis of the terms in a set of records. Most online services now provide a tool for statistical analysis such as GET on Orbit, ZOOM on ESA/IRS and RANK/RANK FILES on Dialog. With these commands, users can analyze term frequency to extrapolate very precise answers to a wide range of questions. This paper discusses the many uses of term frequency analysis and how it can be applied to areas of competitive intelligence, market analysis, bibliometric analysis and improvements of search results. The applications are illustrated by examples from Dialog
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.03
0.033718906 = product of:
0.050578356 = sum of:
0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026672786 = score(doc=2808,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.023905568 = product of:
0.047811136 = sum of:
0.047811136 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047811136 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.03
0.033380013 = product of:
0.050070018 = sum of:
0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026404712 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Citation analysis has long been used by librarians as an important tool of collection development and the advent of Internet technology and especially the WWW adds a new facet to the role played by citation analysis. One of the reasons why librarians create WWW homepages is to provide users with further sources of interest or reference and to do this libraries include links from their own homepages to other information sources. Reports current research on the analysis of WWW pages as an introduction to an examination of the homepages of 25 art libraries to determine what sites are most often included. The types of linked sites are analyzed based on 3 criteria: location, focus and evidence that the link was evaluated before the connection was establisheds
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
-
Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997)
0.03
0.033380013 = product of:
0.050070018 = sum of:
0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026404712 = score(doc=862,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the literature of Qigong: a relaxation technique used to teach patients to control their heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and other involuntary functions through controlles breathing. All articles indexed in the MEDLINE CD-ROM database, between 1965 and 1995 were identified using 'breathing exercises' MeSH term. The articles were analyzed for geographical and language distribution and a ranking exercise enabled a core list of periodicals to be identified. In addition, the study shed light on the changing frequency of the MeSH terms and evaluated the research areas by measuring the information from these respective MeSH headings
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.03
0.032256197 = product of:
0.048384294 = sum of:
0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021338228 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.027046064 = product of:
0.054092128 = sum of:
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96)
0.03
0.032256197 = product of:
0.048384294 = sum of:
0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021338228 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.027046064 = product of:
0.054092128 = sum of:
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library
- Source
- Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
-
Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998)
0.03
0.02822417 = product of:
0.042336255 = sum of:
0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01867095 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:18:46
-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.02
0.024192145 = product of:
0.036288217 = sum of:
0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016003672 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.024192145 = product of:
0.036288217 = sum of:
0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016003672 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.02
0.024192145 = product of:
0.036288217 = sum of:
0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016003672 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999)
0.02
0.024192145 = product of:
0.036288217 = sum of:
0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016003672 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- University librarians continue to face the difficult task of determining which journals remain crucial for their collections during these times of static financial resources and escalating journal costs. One evaluative tool, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), recently has become available on CD-ROM, making it simpler for librarians to use its citation data as input for ranking journals. But many librarians remain unconvinced that the global citation data from the JCR bears enough correspondence to their local situation to be useful. In this project, I explore the correlation between global citation data available from JCR with local citation data generated specifically for the University of British Columbia, for 20 subject fields in the sciences and social sciences. The significant correlations obtained in this study suggest that large research-oriented university libraries could consider substituting global citation data for local citation data when evaluating their journals, with certain cautions.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.02
0.015937045 = product of:
0.047811136 = sum of:
0.047811136 = product of:
0.09562227 = sum of:
0.09562227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09562227 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.02
0.01577687 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = product of:
0.09466122 = sum of:
0.09466122 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09466122 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.02
0.01577687 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = product of:
0.09466122 = sum of:
0.09466122 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09466122 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
-
Williams, J.; Clark, J.D.: ¬The information explosion : fact or myth? (1992)
0.01
0.014225486 = product of:
0.042676456 = sum of:
0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042676456 = score(doc=1081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- IEEE transactions on engineering management. 39(1992) no.1, S.79-84
-
Egghe, L.: Mathematical theories of citation (1998)
0.01
0.014225486 = product of:
0.042676456 = sum of:
0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 5125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042676456 = score(doc=5125,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5125, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5125)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Focuses on possible mathematical theories of citation and on the intrinsic problems related to it. Sheds light on aspects of mathematical complexity as encountered in, for example, fractal theory and Mandelbrot's law. Also discusses dynamical aspects of citation theory as reflected in evolutions of journal rankings, centres of gravity or of the set of source journals. Makes some comments in this connection on growth and obsolescence
-
Khurshid, A.; Sahai, H.: Bibliometric, scientometric and informetric distributions and laws : a selected bibliography (1991)
0.01
0.0124473 = product of:
0.0373419 = sum of:
0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0373419 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991) no.2, S.18-29
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: On the overlap, the precision and estimated recall of search engines : a case study of the query 'Erdös' (1998)
0.01
0.0124473 = product of:
0.0373419 = sum of:
0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0373419 = score(doc=3753,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Investigates the retrieval capabilities of 6 Internet search engines on a simple query. Existing work on search engine evaluation considers only the first 10 or 20 results returned by the search engine. In this work, all documents that the search engine pointed at were retrieved and thoroughly examined. Thus the precision of the whole retrieval process could be calculated, the overlap between the results of the engines studied, and an estimate on the recall of the searches given. The precision of the engines is high, recall is very low and the overlap is minimal
-
Campanario, J.M.: Using 'Citation Classics' to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery (1996)
0.01
0.012319634 = product of:
0.0369589 = sum of:
0.0369589 = weight(_text_:on in 6693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0369589 = score(doc=6693,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 6693, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6693)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Suggests that the literature on the role of chance, error or accident in scientific progress tends to be anecdotal, hagiographic and rarely systematic. In contrast, presents a new approach to this topic, the study of serendipity in scietific discovery. Bases the approach on the study of highly cited papers obtained from the 'Citation Classics' feature of 'Current Contents'. Reports on the analysis of 205 'Citation Classics' commentaries from the 400 most cited papers in the recent history of science, and presents the results of the analysis
