Search (189 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Cano, V.: Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain (1999) 0.04
    0.035440426 = product of:
      0.17720212 = sum of:
        0.023677567 = product of:
          0.047355134 = sum of:
            0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047355134 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.048359692 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048359692 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
        0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047355134 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
        0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047355134 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
        0.0076375115 = weight(_text_:in in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076375115 = score(doc=3770,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews 17 years of research in Library and Information Science in Spain. The total production of 2 major Spanish periodical publications were analyzed from 1977-1994 according to productivity variables and thematic content
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.8, S.675-680
  2. Mahapatra, G.: Indian library and information science journals : a bibliometric analysis of the rate of citations and their characteristics (1993) 0.03
    0.025119442 = product of:
      0.12559721 = sum of:
        0.016574297 = product of:
          0.033148594 = sum of:
            0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033148594 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033851784 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033851784 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
        0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033148594 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
        0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033148594 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
        0.006901989 = weight(_text_:in in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006901989 = score(doc=112,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    A bibliometric analysis of 1,456 articles appearing in Indian Library and Information Science journals between 1975 and 1985 revealed that the average rate of citations per article in the field was quite low. Books and journals were identified as the major categories of documents referred to in these articles and both were positively related. It is concluded that the increase in journal citations and rate of citations between 1975 and 1985 indicates that Indian Library and Information Science journals are now publishing a higher number of research-oriented articles in comparison with earlier years.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Library review. 43(1993) no.3, S.41-46
  3. Kahl, M.: Zitatenanalyse mit den Journal Citation Reports des Institute for Scientific Information : ein Hilfsmittel für die Zeitschriftenauswahl in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken? (1995) 0.02
    0.02369626 = product of:
      0.1015554 = sum of:
        0.011589034 = weight(_text_:und in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011589034 = score(doc=1239,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=1239,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
        0.011589034 = weight(_text_:und in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011589034 = score(doc=1239,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
        0.023686372 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023686372 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die Häufigkeit von Zitierungen wissenschaftlicher Publikationen kann in erster Näherung als Maßstab für ihre inhaltliche Qualität gelten. Die Journal Citation Reports (JCR) des ISI ordnen über die Auszählung von Referenzen aus mehreren tausend Fachzeitschriften durch diverse bibliometrische Indikatoren Zeitschriften einen bestimmten Wert zu. Der Aufbau der Datensammlung sowie die verwendeten Indikatoren werden näher beschrieben. 2 Methoden werden vorgestellt, mit denen in Anwendung der JCR eine Menge von Kernzeitschriften für ein Fachgebiet ermittelt werden kann. Probleme der Zuverlässigkeit bei der Sammlung und Verarbeitung der Zitierdaten durch die JCR werden dargestellt. Die Anwendbarkeit einer Zitatenanalyse für den Bestandsaufbau bei Fachzeitschriften wird untersucht. Sie kann zur Entscheidungsfindung beitragen, andere Methoden aber nicht ersetzen
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 19(1995) H.1, S.30-63
  4. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.02
    0.02355449 = product of:
      0.10094782 = sum of:
        0.0118387835 = product of:
          0.023677567 = sum of:
            0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023677567 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024179846 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023677567 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023677567 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.005833246 = weight(_text_:in in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005833246 = score(doc=2808,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.010332272 = product of:
          0.020664545 = sum of:
            0.020664545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020664545 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.4, S.241-254
  5. Nkereuwem, E.E.: Accrediting knowledge : the ranking of library and information science journals (1997) 0.02
    0.02140604 = product of:
      0.1070302 = sum of:
        0.014206541 = product of:
          0.028413082 = sum of:
            0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028413082 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029015815 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
        0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413082 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
        0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413082 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=786,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how a representative sample of librarians was surveyed to carry out a comparative evaluation of selected journals in library and information science. Respondents were asked to rate each journal on a scale from poor to outstanding (0-10), in terms of their visibility and the quality of articles they publish. Such evaluation should assist librarians in journal selection and in determining the quality of journals to which they send their research papers for publication. Reports the findings of the survey which discovered that some journals such as Library Waves, Assistant Librarian and Library Journal get low ratings because of low visibility and irregular publication. Others such as African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science and Journal of Information Science are rated highly because of familiarity and accessibility. Argues that the results of the study should help librarians determine the quality of journals and will subsequently enhance their utilization and subscription.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Library review. 46(1997) no.2, S.99-104
  6. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.01
    0.013766339 = product of:
      0.08259803 = sum of:
        0.01419361 = weight(_text_:und in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01419361 = score(doc=6110,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
        0.047873653 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047873653 = score(doc=6110,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=6110,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
        0.01419361 = weight(_text_:und in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01419361 = score(doc=6110,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    In einer früheren Studie wurde bereits der 'informationelle Mehrwert' von bibliographischen Datenbanken durch bibliometrische Nutzung untersucht. Im folgenden soll nun eine visuelle Oberfläche vorgestellt werden, die mit Hilfe einer bibliometrischen 'Sekundärdatenbank' einerseits die Nutzungsmöglichkeiten der zugrundeliegenden bibliographischen Datenbanken vor allem in den Bereichen Wissenschaftsinformation, Forschungsevaluation und Wissenschaftspolitik erweitern soll, andererseits aber auch eine Rückkopplung zu den Aufgaben des traditionellen Retrievals erlaubt. Die visuelle Oberfläche 'Visual Bibliometrics' ist eine Erweiterung des CD-Edition des 'Science Citation Index' und des 'Social Science Citation Index'
    Pages
    S.33-42
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.27
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  7. Schramm, R.: Kerninformationen mittels formaler Bewertungskritierien (1996) 0.01
    0.011921194 = product of:
      0.08940896 = sum of:
        0.01622127 = weight(_text_:und in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01622127 = score(doc=6258,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
        0.05471275 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05471275 = score(doc=6258,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5630881 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
        0.01622127 = weight(_text_:und in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01622127 = score(doc=6258,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=6258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die Ermittlung von Kerninformationen mittels informetrischer Methoden erfordert die Nutzung formaler Bewertungskriterien wie Publikationshäufigkeit, Zitierhäufigkeit und Patentfamiliengröße. Es werden die Zeitabhängigkeit, die Austauschbarkeit und die Voraussetzungen für die Anwendung der formalen Bewertungskriterien erläutert.
    Pages
    S.187-196
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.27
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  8. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.01
    0.006370637 = product of:
      0.047779776 = sum of:
        0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020276587 = score(doc=342,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
        0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020276587 = score(doc=342,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Pages
    S.265-302
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  9. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995) 0.01
    0.006370637 = product of:
      0.047779776 = sum of:
        0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020276587 = score(doc=2443,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
        0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020276587 = score(doc=2443,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Als Maß für die Produktivität und den Einfluß von Forschern, wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen und Fachbereichen dienen häufig anhand von Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen erstellte Ranglisten. Doch nach welchen Kriterien sind die in elektronischen Fachdatenbanken gespeicherten Informationen auszuwerten, um ein einigermaßen zutreffendes Abbild der Forschungsleistung zu erhalten?
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1995, H.11, S.118-121
  10. Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997) 0.01
    0.0060849846 = product of:
      0.045637384 = sum of:
        0.018730707 = weight(_text_:und in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018730707 = score(doc=2166,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=2166,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
        0.018730707 = weight(_text_:und in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018730707 = score(doc=2166,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
        0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031871665 = score(doc=2166,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Literaturdatenbanken wurden eigentlich mit zwei Zielen aufgebaut: einerseits Fachliteratur zu archivieren und zu dokumentieren und andererseits die Literaturhinweise den Wissenschaftlern für Recherchen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Aus diesen gespeicherten Datenmengen kann man baer auch allgemeine Erkenntnisse über die Literatur eines Fachgebietes und das Verhalten der Forscher gewinnen. Vor allem seit den sechziger Jahren, seit dem Aufbau des Science Citation Index - in dem man auch nach zitierten Arbeiten suchen kann - gibt es eine Fülle von informationswisenschaftlichen und wissenssoziologischen Untersuchungen mit Datenbanken
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 1997, H.2, S.48-53
  11. Stock, W.G.: Themenanalytische informetrische Methoden (1990) 0.01
    0.0060718358 = product of:
      0.060718358 = sum of:
        0.02838722 = weight(_text_:und in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02838722 = score(doc=5065,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
        0.02838722 = weight(_text_:und in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02838722 = score(doc=5065,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.7-31
    Source
    Psychologie und Philosophie der Grazer Schule: eine Dokumentation zu Werk und Wirkungsgeschichte. Hrsg.: M. Stock und W.G. Stock
  12. Schoepflin, U.; Glänzel, W.: Mehrwert von bibliographischen Datenbanken (1994) 0.01
    0.0056966417 = product of:
      0.08544962 = sum of:
        0.08206912 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08206912 = score(doc=6112,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.84463215 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    S. -
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.16
    Source
    Mehrwert von Information - Professionalisierung der Informationsarbeit: Proceedings des 4. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'94), Graz, 2.-4. November 1994. Hrsg.: W. Rauch u.a
  13. Parthey, H.: Stadien der Wissensproduktion in Forschungsinstituten nach Raten der Publikation und Zitation der in ihnen gewonnenen Ergebnisse (1996) 0.01
    0.0056778933 = product of:
      0.042584196 = sum of:
        0.01622127 = weight(_text_:und in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01622127 = score(doc=5242,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
        0.007887987 = weight(_text_:in in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007887987 = score(doc=5242,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
        0.01622127 = weight(_text_:und in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01622127 = score(doc=5242,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=5242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgangspunkt unserer Überlegungen, ob es möglich ist, Stadien der Wissensproduktion nach Raten der Publikation und Zitation der in ihnen gewonnenen Ergebnisse zu erfassen, waren eine institutsbezogene Untersuchung der Zeitschriftennutzung in der Bibliothe eines außeruniversitären Forschungsinstituts durch Zitationsanalyse der Institutspublikationen, denn der Wandel in der Zeitschriftennutzung ergibt sich unter Umständen aus der Art und Weise des Erarbeitens aufeinanderfolgender Stadien der Wissensproduktion
    Pages
    S.137-146
  14. Herfurth, M.: Voraussetzungen und Entwicklungsperspektiven scientometrischer Analysen auf der Grundlage von Datenbanken (1994) 0.01
    0.0050300057 = product of:
      0.050300054 = sum of:
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 8824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=8824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 8824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8824)
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 8824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=8824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 8824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8824)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 8824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=8824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 8824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8824)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.83-92
    Source
    Qualität und Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993; Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 28.-30.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  15. White, H.D.; McCain, K.W.: Visualizing a discipline : an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995 (1998) 0.00
    0.004593022 = product of:
      0.04593022 = sum of:
        0.038687754 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687754 = score(doc=5020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=5020,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=5020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an extensive domain analysis of information science in terms of its authors. Names of those most frequently cited in 12 key journals from 1972 through 1995 were retrieved from Social SciSearch via Dialog. The top 120 were submitted to author co-citation analyzes, yielding automatic classifications relevant to histories of the field
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.4, S.327-355
  16. Marx, W.; Gramm, G.: Literaturflut - Informationslawine - Wissensexplosion : Wächst der Wissenschaft das Wissen über den Kopf? (1997) 0.00
    0.003738614 = product of:
      0.028039604 = sum of:
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 1078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=1078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1078)
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 1078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=1078,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1078, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1078)
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 1078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=1078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1078)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1078)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific information has stopped growing exponentially as in the last 300 years. Nevertheless, the number of scientific papers published yearly remains dramatic. Well orderd databases and sophisticated search systems allow scientists to find the needle in the haystack. A growing number of factual databases as well as more reviews compress and refine information. Not searching but controlling and working up information appear to become the most important problem in the future
    Pages
    S.103-119
    Source
    Beiträge zum XVIII. Fortbildungsseminar für Bibliotheksleiter/innen der Max-Planck-Institute und Arbeitsgruppen, 2.-5. Mai 1995 in Garching. Red.: H.C. Kuhn
  17. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.00
    0.0036031173 = product of:
      0.03603117 = sum of:
        0.012549544 = product of:
          0.03764863 = sum of:
            0.03764863 = weight(_text_:l in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764863 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
        0.020664545 = product of:
          0.04132909 = sum of:
            0.04132909 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04132909 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
    Source
    Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.2, S.259-265
  18. Schramm, R.; Bartkowski, A.: Patentindikatoren zur Ermittlung von Kerninformationen (1996) 0.00
    0.0035928607 = product of:
      0.035928607 = sum of:
        0.016555762 = weight(_text_:und in 5357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016555762 = score(doc=5357,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5357, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5357)
        0.016555762 = weight(_text_:und in 5357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016555762 = score(doc=5357,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5357, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5357)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 5357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=5357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 5357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5357)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Mittels Patentindikatoren ist es möglich, wesentliche Erfinder und Erfindungen hervorzuheben. Die Anwendbarkeit von Patentindikatoren ist zeitabhängig. Der eingeführte Patentindikator SPI (Science-on-Patent Influence) signalisiert den Grad der Wissenschaftlichkeit des Erfinders und seiner Erfindungen. Seine rarionelle Nutzung zur Ermittlung von Kerninformation wird vorgestellt
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 47(1996) H.5, S.293-300
  19. Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996) 0.00
    0.0032682654 = product of:
      0.02451199 = sum of:
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Ein überfordertes Gutachter-System, knapper fließende Forschungsgelder sowie die starke Faszination von Ranglisten bewirken zunehmend den Einsatz bibliometrischer Methoden zur Messung von Forschungsqualität. Grundlage der meisten Bewertungen ist der Science Citation Index, der nun auch in der Version als Online-Datenbank für umfangreiche Analysen genutzt werden kann. Erweiterungen der Retrievalsprache beim Host STN International ermöglichen statistische Analysen, die bisher nur dem SCI-Hersteller und wenigen Spezialisten vorbehalten waren. Voraussetzung für eine sinnvolle Anwendung sind vor allem die Wahl geeigneter Selektionskriterien sowie die sorgfältige Interpretation der Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Grenzen dieser Methoden
    Source
    Cogito. 12(1996) H.4, S.35-38
  20. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.00
    0.0028971736 = product of:
      0.0217288 = sum of:
        0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003741601 = score(doc=7659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
        0.008767224 = product of:
          0.017534448 = sum of:
            0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017534448 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170

Languages