Search (103 results, page 2 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.01 
    0.009337518 = product of:
  0.018675037 = sum of:
    0.018675037 = product of:
      0.037350073 = sum of:
        0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037350073 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
  2. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01 
    0.009337518 = product of:
  0.018675037 = sum of:
    0.018675037 = product of:
      0.037350073 = sum of:
        0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037350073 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  3. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.01 
    0.009337518 = product of:
  0.018675037 = sum of:
    0.018675037 = product of:
      0.037350073 = sum of:
        0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037350073 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  4. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.01 
    0.009337518 = product of:
  0.018675037 = sum of:
    0.018675037 = product of:
      0.037350073 = sum of:
        0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037350073 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.01 
    0.009337518 = product of:
  0.018675037 = sum of:
    0.018675037 = product of:
      0.037350073 = sum of:
        0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037350073 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  6. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.01 
    0.009337518 = product of:
  0.018675037 = sum of:
    0.018675037 = product of:
      0.037350073 = sum of:
        0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037350073 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  7. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.01 
    0.007781266 = product of:
  0.015562532 = sum of:
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031125063 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  8. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.01 
    0.007781266 = product of:
  0.015562532 = sum of:
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031125063 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  9. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.007781266 = product of:
  0.015562532 = sum of:
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031125063 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
  10. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.01 
    0.007781266 = product of:
  0.015562532 = sum of:
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031125063 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  11. Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.01 
    0.007781266 = product of:
  0.015562532 = sum of:
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031125063 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:02:48
  12. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01 
    0.0062250122 = product of:
  0.0124500245 = sum of:
    0.0124500245 = product of:
      0.024900049 = sum of:
        0.024900049 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024900049 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  13. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.01 
    0.0054969285 = product of:
  0.010993857 = sum of:
    0.010993857 = product of:
      0.021987714 = sum of:
        0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021987714 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  14. Harries, G.; Wilkinson, D.; Price, L.; Fairclough, R.; Thelwall, M.: Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping : making sense of it all (2005) 0.01 
    0.0054969285 = product of:
  0.010993857 = sum of:
    0.010993857 = product of:
      0.021987714 = sum of:
        0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021987714 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004) 0.00 
    0.004580774 = product of:
  0.009161548 = sum of:
    0.009161548 = product of:
      0.018323096 = sum of:
        0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323096 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  16. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie als Teil eines Trenderkennugns-Systems in der Naturwissenschaft (2009) 0.00 
    0.0045347353 = product of:
  0.009069471 = sum of:
    0.009069471 = product of:
      0.018138941 = sum of:
        0.018138941 = weight(_text_:d in 2770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018138941 = score(doc=2770,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 2770, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  17. Nah, I.W.; Kang, D.-S.; Lee, D.-H.; Chung, Y.-C.: ¬A bibliometric evaluation of research performance in different subject categories (2009) 0.00 
    0.0045347353 = product of:
  0.009069471 = sum of:
    0.009069471 = product of:
      0.018138941 = sum of:
        0.018138941 = weight(_text_:d in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018138941 = score(doc=2772,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.00 
    0.003886916 = product of:
  0.007773832 = sum of:
    0.007773832 = product of:
      0.015547664 = sum of:
        0.015547664 = weight(_text_:d in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015547664 = score(doc=718,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.178113 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  19. Schlögl, C; Stock, W.G.: Deutsche Zeitschriften des Bibliotheks- und Informationswesens : Leser, Zitate und Redaktionen in szientometrischer Analyse (2006) 0.00 
    0.003886916 = product of:
  0.007773832 = sum of:
    0.007773832 = product of:
      0.015547664 = sum of:
        0.015547664 = weight(_text_:d in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015547664 = score(doc=52,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.178113 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  20. Ravichandra Rao, I.K.; Sahoo, B.B.: Studies and research in informetrics at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC), ISI Bangalore (2006) 0.00 
    0.003886916 = product of:
  0.007773832 = sum of:
    0.007773832 = product of:
      0.015547664 = sum of:
        0.015547664 = weight(_text_:d in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015547664 = score(doc=1512,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Contributions of DRTC to informetric studies and research are discussed. A report on recent work - a quantitative country-wise analysis of software literature based on the data from two bibliographic databases i.e. COMPENDEX and INSPEC is presented. The number of countries involved in R & D activities in software in the most productive group is increasing. The research contribution on software is decreasing in developed countries as compared to that in developing and less developed countries. India 's contribution is only 1.1% and it has remained constant over the period of 12 years 1989-2001. The number of countries involved in R&D activities in software has been increasing in the 1990s. It is also noted that higher the budget for higher education, higher the number of publications; and that higher the number of publications, higher the export as well as the domestic consumption of software.

Authors

Languages

  • e 64
  • d 39

Themes