-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : I: a literature science study on the journal level (2001)
0.04
0.037012145 = product of:
0.07402429 = sum of:
0.07402429 = product of:
0.14804858 = sum of:
0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14804858 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the second bibliometric paper SzavaKovtas uses ``indirectcollective references, ICR'' to mean such instances as those in which an author refers to, ``the references contained therein,'' when referring to another source. Having previously shown a high instance of occurrences in Physical Reviews, he now uses the January 1997 issues of 40 journals from the ISI physics category plus two optics journals, an instrumentation journal, and a physics journal launched in 1997, to locate ICR. The phenomena exists in all but one of the sampled journals and in the next, but unsampled, issue of that journal. Overall 17% of papers sampled display ICR with little fluctuation within internal categories.
-
Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002)
0.03
0.031724695 = product of:
0.06344939 = sum of:
0.06344939 = product of:
0.12689878 = sum of:
0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12689878 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = product of:
0.1089542 = sum of:
0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1089542 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000)
0.03
0.026437245 = product of:
0.05287449 = sum of:
0.05287449 = product of:
0.10574898 = sum of:
0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10574898 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Authors' motivation for citing documents are addressed through a literature review and an empirical study. Replicating an investigation in psychology, the works of 2 highly-cited authors in the discipline of communication were identified, and all of the authros who cited them during the period 1995-1997 were surveyed. The instrument posed 32 questions about why a certain document was cited, plus questions about the citer's relationship to the cited author and document. Most findings were similar to the psychology study, including a tendency to cite 'concept markers' representing a genre of work. Authors in communication were more likely to have an interpersonal connection to cited authors, and to cite literatire reviews - their most common reason for citation. 3 types of judgements about cited works were found to best predict citation: (1) that the work was novel, well-known, and a concept-marker; (2) that citing it might promote the authority of one's own work; and (3) that the work deserved criticism. Suggestions are made for further research, especially regarding the anomalous role of creativity in cited works
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.; Rowlands, I.: Diffusion factors (2006)
0.03
0.026437245 = product of:
0.05287449 = sum of:
0.05287449 = product of:
0.10574898 = sum of:
0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10574898 = score(doc=5587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to clarify earlier work on journal diffusion metrics. Classical journal indicators such as the Garfield impact factor do not measure the breadth of influence across the literature of a particular journal title. As a new approach to measuring research influence, the study complements these existing metrics with a series of formally described diffusion factors. Design/methodology/approach - Using a publication-citation matrix as an organising construct, the paper develops formal descriptions of two forms of diffusion metric: "relative diffusion factors" and "journal diffusion factors" in both their synchronous and diachronous forms. It also provides worked examples for selected library and information science and economics journals, plus a sample of health information papers to illustrate their construction and use. Findings - Diffusion factors capture different aspects of the citation reception process than existing bibliometric measures. The paper shows that diffusion factors can be applied at the whole journal level or for sets of articles and that they provide a richer evidence base for citation analyses than traditional measures alone. Research limitations/implications - The focus of this paper is on clarifying the concepts underlying diffusion factors and there is unlimited scope for further work to apply these metrics to much larger and more comprehensive data sets than has been attempted here. Practical implications - These new tools extend the range of tools available for bibliometric, and possibly webometric, analysis. Diffusion factors might find particular application in studies where the research questions focus on the dynamic aspects of innovation and knowledge transfer. Originality/value - This paper will be of interest to those with theoretical interests in informetric distributions as well as those interested in science policy and innovation studies.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024075704 = product of:
0.048151407 = sum of:
0.048151407 = product of:
0.096302815 = sum of:
0.096302815 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096302815 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.02
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = product of:
0.08171564 = sum of:
0.08171564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08171564 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.014445423 = product of:
0.028890846 = sum of:
0.028890846 = product of:
0.057781693 = sum of:
0.057781693 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057781693 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014445423 = product of:
0.028890846 = sum of:
0.028890846 = product of:
0.057781693 = sum of:
0.057781693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057781693 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.013619275 = product of:
0.02723855 = sum of:
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0544771 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.013619275 = product of:
0.02723855 = sum of:
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0544771 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.012037852 = product of:
0.024075704 = sum of:
0.024075704 = product of:
0.048151407 = sum of:
0.048151407 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048151407 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.011916866 = product of:
0.023833731 = sum of:
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047667462 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 18:22:28
