Search (306 results, page 16 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Do new research issues attract more citations? : a comparison between 25 Scopus subject categories (2021) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.00
    0.0031349224 = product of:
      0.0062698447 = sum of:
        0.0062698447 = product of:
          0.012539689 = sum of:
            0.012539689 = weight(_text_:m in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012539689 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
  3. Bonitz, M.: Ranking of nations and heightened competition in Matthew core journals : two faces of the Matthew effect for countries (2002) 0.00
    0.0031349224 = product of:
      0.0062698447 = sum of:
        0.0062698447 = product of:
          0.012539689 = sum of:
            0.012539689 = weight(_text_:m in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012539689 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Moed, H.F.; Luwel, M.; Nederhof, A.J.: Towards research performance in the humanities (2002) 0.00
    0.0031349224 = product of:
      0.0062698447 = sum of:
        0.0062698447 = product of:
          0.012539689 = sum of:
            0.012539689 = weight(_text_:m in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012539689 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Barjak, F.; Li, X.; Thelwall, M.: Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? (2007) 0.00
    0.0031349224 = product of:
      0.0062698447 = sum of:
        0.0062698447 = product of:
          0.012539689 = sum of:
            0.012539689 = weight(_text_:m in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012539689 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Sud, P.; Thelwall, M.: Not all international collaboration is beneficial : the Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration (2016) 0.00
    0.0031349224 = product of:
      0.0062698447 = sum of:
        0.0062698447 = product of:
          0.012539689 = sum of:
            0.012539689 = weight(_text_:m in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012539689 = score(doc=3048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 278
  • d 26
  • chi 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…