Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998)
0.01
0.008337184 = product of:
0.033348735 = sum of:
0.02231347 = weight(_text_:of in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231347 = score(doc=3995,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
0.0110352645 = product of:
0.022070529 = sum of:
0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022070529 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of models of the process of scholarly communication and the role that bibliometrics can play in studying this process
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
