Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Krattenthaler, C.: Was der h-Index wirklich aussagt (2021) 0.04
    0.037988503 = product of:
      0.113965504 = sum of:
        0.113965504 = product of:
          0.22793101 = sum of:
            0.22793101 = weight(_text_:index in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22793101 = score(doc=407,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                1.021885 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Diese Note legt dar, dass der sogenannte h-Index (Hirschs bibliometrischer Index) im Wesentlichen dieselbe Information wiedergibt wie die Gesamtanzahl von Zitationen von Publikationen einer Autorin oder eines Autors, also ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index ist. Dies basiert auf einem faszinierenden Satz der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, der hier ebenfalls erläutert wird.
    Content
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1515/dmvm-2021-0050. Auch abgedruckt u.d.T.: 'Der h-Index - "ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index"' in Open Password Nr. 1007 vom 06.12.2021 unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM3NCwiZDI3MzMzOTEwMzUzIiwwLDAsMzQ4LDFd.
    Object
    h-index
  2. Chawla, D.S.: Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database (2021) 0.01
    0.013043619 = product of:
      0.039130855 = sum of:
        0.039130855 = weight(_text_:science in 148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039130855 = score(doc=148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=148)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scopus has stopped adding content from most of the flagged titles, but the analysis highlights how poor-quality science is infiltrating literature.
  3. Positionspapier der DMV zur Verwendung bibliometrischer Daten (2020) 0.01
    0.0125635145 = product of:
      0.037690543 = sum of:
        0.037690543 = product of:
          0.075381085 = sum of:
            0.075381085 = weight(_text_:index in 5738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075381085 = score(doc=5738,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 5738, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5738)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Object
    h-index
  4. Williams, B.: Dimensions & VOSViewer bibliometrics in the reference interview (2020) 0.01
    0.009130533 = product of:
      0.027391598 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 5719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=5719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5719)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The VOSviewer software provides easy access to bibliometric mapping using data from Dimensions, Scopus and Web of Science. The properly formatted and structured citation data, and the ease in which it can be exported open up new avenues for use during citation searches and eference interviews. This paper details specific techniques for using advanced searches in Dimensions, exporting the citation data, and drawing insights from the maps produced in VOS Viewer. These search techniques and data export practices are fast and accurate enough to build into reference interviews for graduate students, faculty, and post-PhD researchers. The search results derived from them are accurate and allow a more comprehensive view of citation networks embedded in ordinary complex boolean searches.

Languages